The procedure in F19 could be made more accurate in two respects:
-
first, step 2 refers specifically to the availability of a link. However, I don't think the procedure should specify whether the mechanism is a link or any other particular implementation. It should simply require that a mechanism is available, leaving the implementation technology-neutral and consistent with the normative wording.
-
second, the "Expected Results" section states:
If check # 2 is false, the content fails the Success Criterion.
This wording is inaccurate because F19 is not mapped to a specific SC. We should say something like "If check # 2 is false, the content is not conforming."
The procedure in F19 could be made more accurate in two respects:
first, step 2 refers specifically to the availability of a link. However, I don't think the procedure should specify whether the mechanism is a link or any other particular implementation. It should simply require that a mechanism is available, leaving the implementation technology-neutral and consistent with the normative wording.
second, the "Expected Results" section states:
This wording is inaccurate because F19 is not mapped to a specific SC. We should say something like "If check # 2 is false, the content is not conforming."