Skip to content

[css-display-3] HTML should be an informative, rather than normative, bibliographic reference #1011

Closed

Description

@bert-github

‘[HTML]’ is in the Normative References[1], but it seems the only mention of things defined by HTML is just after the words "For example" in section 2.5[2]. I think ‘[HTML]’ should be in the Informative References instead.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170126/#normative
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-display-3-20170126/#box-generation

Activity

  1. fantasai commented on Feb 14, 2017

    @fantasai
    Collaborator

    Assigning to @tabatkins since I can't fix this--the references are auto-generated from Bikeshed due to element references in the prose.

  2. tabatkins commented on Mar 14, 2017

    @tabatkins
    Member

    Fixed. (You can mark individual links or sections as non-normative with a class=non-normative on an ancestor.)

  3. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 14, 2017
    ce861d9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions