You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The BCP number obviates the need for "or its successor" (its the point of using the BCP number)
The word "codes" should always be replaced with "language tags". BCP47 grokketh not "codes", only "tags" and "subtags". (The underlying ISO standards have "codes").
Agreed, that is the point of a BCP. I suspect the current text originally referenced an RFC (so successor would have been correct) and this was not adjusted when BCP47 was edited in
Activity
svgeesus commentedon Mar 12, 2026
Agreed, that is the point of a BCP. I suspect the current text originally referenced an RFC (so successor would have been correct) and this was not adjusted when BCP47 was edited in
[selectors-4] Respond to review feedback on BCP 47 language codes, #1…
svgeesus commentedon Mar 24, 2026
@aphillips please see 656f665
aphillips commentedon Mar 24, 2026
@svgeesus LGTM