You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[css-cascade][css-scoping] Define Shadow Tree in Cascade #5372
The CSS Working Group just discussed [css-cascade][css-scoping] Define Shadow Tree in Cascade, and agreed to the following:
RESOLVED: Shift shadow dom cascade to cascade 4, remove scoping from cascade 4, move cascade 4 to WD and republish
The full IRC log of that discussion
<dael> Topic: [css-cascade][css-scoping] Define Shadow Tree in Cascade
<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/5372
<myles> q+ to ask if this is entirely an editorial change
<dael> fantasai: Noticing they're defined in scoping spec. I think we should import into cascade spec
<myles> q-
<dael> fantasai: This would be normative b/c moving between specs but no effect on impl.
<dino> 🎁➕
<dael> fantasai: Assuming we do it correctly ^-^
<dael> Rossen_: Any thoughts about this?
<dael> Rossen_: Any reasons why not?
<dael> AmeliaBR: Spec statuses?
<dael> fantasai: Scoping is WD. Cascade 4 which I think is where we should put it is CR
<dael> fantasai: Might consider pulling it to WD, adding this section, removing scoping which I think no one implements. If we do that only difference from L3 is revert keyword
<dael> fantasai: Process-wise maybe that's safest way to go since seems to be where impl have landed
<dael> AmeliaBR: more shuffling than just this but end result is version of cascade 4 with impl features?
<dael> fantasai: That's my proposal. Broader thank issue scope but makes the most sense
<dael> fantasai: Assuming no one impl scoping
<dael> florian: If we remove scoping it changes style attributes. We should go back and define them in terms of specificity again.
<dael> fantasai: I think that's part of edits
<dael> fantasai: Prop: Shift shadow dom cascade to cascade 4, removing scoping from cascade 4, move cascade 4 to WD and republish
<dael> Rossen_: Sounds like fine orchestration
<dael> Rossen_: Obj?
<dael> RESOLVED: Shift shadow dom cascade to cascade 4, remove scoping from cascade 4, move cascade 4 to WD and republish
<dael> fantasai: When we have cascade 5 we'll put scoping in that. I'll leave 5 as ED with just scoping for now
Activity
css-meeting-bot commentedon Aug 5, 2020
The CSS Working Group just discussed
[css-cascade][css-scoping] Define Shadow Tree in Cascade, and agreed to the following:RESOLVED: Shift shadow dom cascade to cascade 4, remove scoping from cascade 4, move cascade 4 to WD and republishThe full IRC log of that discussion
<dael> Topic: [css-cascade][css-scoping] Define Shadow Tree in Cascade<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/5372
<myles> q+ to ask if this is entirely an editorial change
<dael> fantasai: Noticing they're defined in scoping spec. I think we should import into cascade spec
<myles> q-
<dael> fantasai: This would be normative b/c moving between specs but no effect on impl.
<dino> 🎁➕
<dael> fantasai: Assuming we do it correctly ^-^
<dael> Rossen_: Any thoughts about this?
<dael> Rossen_: Any reasons why not?
<dael> AmeliaBR: Spec statuses?
<dael> fantasai: Scoping is WD. Cascade 4 which I think is where we should put it is CR
<dael> fantasai: Might consider pulling it to WD, adding this section, removing scoping which I think no one implements. If we do that only difference from L3 is revert keyword
<dael> fantasai: Process-wise maybe that's safest way to go since seems to be where impl have landed
<dael> AmeliaBR: more shuffling than just this but end result is version of cascade 4 with impl features?
<dael> fantasai: That's my proposal. Broader thank issue scope but makes the most sense
<dael> fantasai: Assuming no one impl scoping
<dael> florian: If we remove scoping it changes style attributes. We should go back and define them in terms of specificity again.
<dael> fantasai: I think that's part of edits
<dael> fantasai: Prop: Shift shadow dom cascade to cascade 4, removing scoping from cascade 4, move cascade 4 to WD and republish
<dael> Rossen_: Sounds like fine orchestration
<dael> Rossen_: Obj?
<dael> RESOLVED: Shift shadow dom cascade to cascade 4, remove scoping from cascade 4, move cascade 4 to WD and republish
<dael> fantasai: When we have cascade 5 we'll put scoping in that. I'll leave 5 as ED with just scoping for now
[css-cascade-4][css-scoping-1] Move Shadow DOM cascade definition int…