Possible typo #129

Activity

1. dyacob

   added a commit that references this issue on Oct 17, 2022

   Spelling and minor grammar corrections as per Issue #129.

   0cc2e99
2. dyacob commented on Oct 17, 2022

   

   dyacob

   on Oct 17, 2022

   Last edited by dyacob

   Member

   More actions

   Agree, and thanks for pointing this out @xfq. While fixing this typo I addressed a number of others that a spellchecker illuminated, and have committed the corrections.

   One thing I notice now in the document is the use of "Sebatbeit" which was the Unicode term in use since v4.1 (2004). The current, more inclusive preferred term, would be "Gurage" which Unicode v14 uses (2021). So an update to replace "Sebatbeit" with "Gurage" would be advised. @r12a , if you concur I am happy to proceed.

   Note: I initially committed and pushed with a message that referenced the wrong issue number, I corrected with "git --amend". When pushing after amend, less than a minute later, git told me that my local branch was now behind the remote. So I had to pull and merge to then make the push. This may look odd in the commit history, it doesn't appear that the merge touched any files.
3. r12a commented on Oct 24, 2022

   

   r12a

   on Oct 24, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   One thing I notice now in the document is the use of "Sebatbeit" which was the Unicode term in use since v4.1 (2004). The current, more inclusive preferred term, would be "Gurage" which Unicode v14 uses (2021). So an update to replace "Sebatbeit" with "Gurage" would be advised. @r12a , if you concur I am happy to proceed.

   @dyacob I'm happy for you to make that change. Thanks.