Repository navigation
Fix glossterm HTML usage context. - #3007
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Since `dl[epub:type="glossary"] > dd` is specified as implied to be _glossdef_, I assume _glossterm_ should be implied from `... > dt`.
|
emilis marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg. |
|
iherman marked as substantive for IPR from ash-nazg. |
Member
|
As a copy/paste typo, I agree, but as the actual implied term, no, I think the SSV is wrong on that count. The But I expect this is one of the more unused corners of epub as the indexing spec never got traction, so it probably doesn't matter too much if implying the term from |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since
dl[epub:type="glossary"] > ddis specified as implied to be glossdef, I assume glossterm should be implied from... > dt.