Skip to content

Boten marks lack wide support — FIXED ! #173

Open

Description

@r12a

This issue is applicable to Japanese & Chinese, in particular.

Chinese and Japanese have a native way of indicating emphasis for short ranges of inline text which involves placing a small mark above or below the characters being emphasised in horizontal text, and to the right/left in vertical text.

The actual marks used vary, depending on author preference, although some marks are more common in vertical text and others in horizontal. Typically, dots, circles, or 'sesame seed' shapes are used.

The following illustrates this:
Slide0210-3107917968

More:

css-text-decor CSS has several properties for displaying emphasis marks, and colouring them, positioning them, etc.

The GAP

The tests below check for support of the most common shapes, and that the positioning can be managed. When this gap was initially raised, Chrome (and legacy Edge) did not support display of emphasis marks, but now all major browsers support them.

Tests & results:

i18n test suite, CSS3 Text decoration, emphasis marks

Action taken

Document the layout requirements for Chinese and Japanese.

Outcomes

Boten marks are now supported in all 3 major engines: Gecko, Blink, and Webkit.

Activity

  1. added
    gapThe first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document.
    doc:jlreqUsed for gap analysis (only) to indicate target document.
    p:advancedUsed for gap analysis issues (only) to indicate priority.
    on Feb 3, 2020
  2. r12a commented on Feb 3, 2020

    @r12a
    ContributorAuthor

    The first comment in this issue contains text that will automatically appear in one or more gap-analysis documents as a subsection with the same title as this issue. Any edits made to that comment will be immediately available in the Editor's draft of the document. Proposals for changes or discussion of the content can be made by adding comments below this point.

    Relevant gap analysis documents include:
    Chinese • Japanese

  3. added and removed
    p:advancedUsed for gap analysis issues (only) to indicate priority.
    on Sep 2, 2022
  4. reopened this on Apr 26, 2023
  5. xfq commented on Oct 13, 2023

    @xfq
    Member

    Added links to clreq and jlreq.

  6. golden1282 commented on Nov 20, 2024

    @golden1282

    The most common form for this is the use of an external variable or a combination of two variables that are used to determine whether or not the object has been created in the first place and which of those variables has the highest probability of being generated from the object itself or the result in a particular situation that has the highest likelihood of success in the future of this case

  7. changed the title [-]Boten marks lack wide support[/-] [+]Boten marks lack wide support — FIXED ![/+] on Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    doc:jlreqUsed for gap analysis (only) to indicate target document.gapThe first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document.i:text_decorationOther inline featuresl:jaJapanesep:oks:jpanJapanese scriptx:clreqx:jpan

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions