Skip to content

At risk: ManifestImageResource.platform? #909

Description

@mgiuca

I believe ManifestImageResource.platform should be considered at risk. I don't think Chrome implements it (ParseIcons in Chrome's manifest parser doesn't look at the "platform" member). And I don't think it's necessary. Does Gecko or WebKit implement this?

Since we added maskable and monochrome, we're trending towards specifying purposes with specialized semantics, but not specific to any OS. I think that's much better than letting developers supply specific icons for each OS.

I think it can be removed.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions