Skip to content

ambiguous statement for proxy in WG/IG #373

Closed

Description

@koalie

Section " 5.2.1. Working Group and Interest Group Participation Requirements" contains:

As a courtesy to the group, if the substitute is not well-versed in the group’s discussions, the regular participant should authorize another participant to act as proxy for votes.

It isn't clear to me whether this introduces a 3rd individual, in addition to the regular participant and the substitute.

Also, it isn't obvious to me why this is a courtesy to the group. As courtesy to a group, I'd expect more something along a heads-up or notification of a situation.

Activity

  1. dwsinger commented on Feb 17, 2020

    @dwsinger
    Contributor

    I think it's suggesting that if you send a newby substitute, don't give them your proxy, but instead have an old hand proxy your vote. When was the last time we had a formal proxy in a WG? Suggest we leave this alone.

  2. koalie commented on Feb 17, 2020

    @koalie
    ContributorAuthor

    Ah, got it!
    I'd suggest disambiguating by using "[...]authorize another participant instead,".

  3. added this to the Deferred milestone on Mar 11, 2020
  4. frivoal commented on Mar 11, 2020

    @frivoal
    Collaborator

    This is not necessarily editorial, depending on how people read the original sentence, and applies to a part of the process that isn't new in the 2020 cycle. As agreed with the CG chair, marking it as deferred, to handle it in a subsequent cycle.

  5. plehegar commented on Jan 17, 2023

    @plehegar
    Member
  6. fantasai commented on Dec 4, 2024

    @fantasai
    Contributor

    ... I think we should just remove this sentence, I don't see what purpose it's serving.

    Alternatively, delete the sentence and modify the previous sentence to allow either the substitute or another participant to proxy the vote (presumably for cases where you don't have a substitute; I'm not sure why you'd pick someone else if you have a substitute...).

  7. added
    Agenda+Recommends to the Chairs that this issue or pull request be discussed at the next meeting
    on Dec 4, 2024
  8. css-meeting-bot commented on Jan 22, 2025

    @css-meeting-bot
    Member

    The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Ambiguous proxy statement, and agreed to the following:

    • RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".
    The full IRC log of that discussion <fantasai> Topic: Ambiguous proxy statement
    <fantasai> florian: Coralie pointed out an ambiguous phrase [quotes]
    <fantasai> github: https://github.com//issues/373
    <fantasai> florian: One suggestion from fantasai is to just delete the sentence
    <fantasai> [discussion about what this section is about]
    <fantasai> fantasai: We have a separate paragraph about proxy votes, apparently, so should just delete this sentence
    <fantasai> plh: Objections to removing sentence starting "As a courtesy"
    <fantasai> RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".
  9. removed
    Agenda+Recommends to the Chairs that this issue or pull request be discussed at the next meeting
    on Jan 22, 2025
  10. added
    Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
    on Jan 23, 2025
  11. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 23, 2025
    781be8f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Closed: AcceptedThe issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions