You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Section " 5.2.1. Working Group and Interest Group Participation Requirements" contains:
As a courtesy to the group, if the substitute is not well-versed in the group’s discussions, the regular participant should authorize another participant to act as proxy for votes.
It isn't clear to me whether this introduces a 3rd individual, in addition to the regular participant and the substitute.
Also, it isn't obvious to me why this is a courtesy to the group. As courtesy to a group, I'd expect more something along a heads-up or notification of a situation.
I think it's suggesting that if you send a newby substitute, don't give them your proxy, but instead have an old hand proxy your vote. When was the last time we had a formal proxy in a WG? Suggest we leave this alone.
This is not necessarily editorial, depending on how people read the original sentence, and applies to a part of the process that isn't new in the 2020 cycle. As agreed with the CG chair, marking it as deferred, to handle it in a subsequent cycle.
... I think we should just remove this sentence, I don't see what purpose it's serving.
Alternatively, delete the sentence and modify the previous sentence to allow either the substitute or another participant to proxy the vote (presumably for cases where you don't have a substitute; I'm not sure why you'd pick someone else if you have a substitute...).
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Ambiguous proxy statement, and agreed to the following:
RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".
The full IRC log of that discussion
<fantasai> Topic: Ambiguous proxy statement
<fantasai> florian: Coralie pointed out an ambiguous phrase [quotes]
<fantasai> github: https://github.com//issues/373
<fantasai> florian: One suggestion from fantasai is to just delete the sentence
<fantasai> [discussion about what this section is about]
<fantasai> fantasai: We have a separate paragraph about proxy votes, apparently, so should just delete this sentence
<fantasai> plh: Objections to removing sentence starting "As a courtesy"
<fantasai> RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".
Activity
dwsinger commentedon Feb 17, 2020
I think it's suggesting that if you send a newby substitute, don't give them your proxy, but instead have an old hand proxy your vote. When was the last time we had a formal proxy in a WG? Suggest we leave this alone.
koalie commentedon Feb 17, 2020
Ah, got it!
I'd suggest disambiguating by using "[...]authorize another participant instead,".
frivoal commentedon Mar 11, 2020
This is not necessarily editorial, depending on how people read the original sentence, and applies to a part of the process that isn't new in the 2020 cycle. As agreed with the CG chair, marking it as deferred, to handle it in a subsequent cycle.
plehegar commentedon Jan 17, 2023
from https://www.w3.org/2023/01/11-w3process-minutes.html
-> deferred
fantasai commentedon Dec 4, 2024
... I think we should just remove this sentence, I don't see what purpose it's serving.
Alternatively, delete the sentence and modify the previous sentence to allow either the substitute or another participant to proxy the vote (presumably for cases where you don't have a substitute; I'm not sure why you'd pick someone else if you have a substitute...).
css-meeting-bot commentedon Jan 22, 2025
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed
Ambiguous proxy statement, and agreed to the following:RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".The full IRC log of that discussion
<fantasai> Topic: Ambiguous proxy statement<fantasai> florian: Coralie pointed out an ambiguous phrase [quotes]
<fantasai> github: https://github.com//issues/373
<fantasai> florian: One suggestion from fantasai is to just delete the sentence
<fantasai> [discussion about what this section is about]
<fantasai> fantasai: We have a separate paragraph about proxy votes, apparently, so should just delete this sentence
<fantasai> plh: Objections to removing sentence starting "As a courtesy"
<fantasai> RESOLVED: Remove the sentence starting "As a courtesy".
Remove confusing statement about separate proxies and substitute