You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
C.4.2 out-of-range flag values note is invalid/unsupported, should be dropped #324
Any nonzero value for either of the flags fA or fS is taken to mean the value 1.
while the grammar still insists on flag::=("0"|"1").
Now in fact browsers do insist on flag values of '0' or '1'. And the SVG 1.1 test suite insists on flag values of '0' or '1', which is what the browsers probably copied.
The C.4.2 note carried over from SVG 1.1/1.0
Any nonzero value for either of the flags fA or fS is taken to mean the value 1.
should be dropped as it was never implemented by at least the major browsers, which chose to support the stated grammar and the expected test results.
Yes, this seems to be a simple "match reality" change.
(Even though I personally wish that the grammar allowed you to recreate behavior described for SMIL animation, and supported in-between values that round to 0 or 1. But the grammar & the major implementations win out.)
Activity
boggydigital commentedon Jun 11, 2018
Not blocking updated 2.0 CR publication - assigning 2.0 Recommendation milestone to clean this up before 2.0 REC
svgeesus commentedon Aug 5, 2018
Agreeing that this non-implemented and contradictory constraint should simply be dropped.
fix #324
AmeliaBR commentedon Aug 5, 2018
Yes, this seems to be a simple "match reality" change.
(Even though I personally wish that the grammar allowed you to recreate behavior described for SMIL animation, and supported in-between values that round to 0 or 1. But the grammar & the major implementations win out.)
Move normative parts of implnote.html to chapters
No normative appendices! (#548)
Tidying up, post-"No normative appendices" (#550)