You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Document Status Update 2011-09-22: This paragraph is informative. The concepts this document defines are obsolete. The 'document' and 'defaultView' attributes are defined in the HTML5 specification with simplified semantics. The Web Applications Working Group encourages implementation of these concepts as defined by HTML5.
I don't find DOM Views in HTML5 (or in DOM LS either).
I don't understand why we have references to both HTML 5.1 2nd Edition and also HTML LS. Can refs to the former simply be converted to reference the latter? Is there some specific W3C-only functionality that we need (and is implemented)?
I don't understand why we have references to both HTML 5.1 2nd Edition and also HTML LS.
Because no one has gone through and updated all the references & links to W3C HTML to point to their matching places in WHATWG. I don't think there are any details we need to reference that are only in the W3C versions.
Do we really still have a normative dependency on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ?
It looks like we still have definitions of SMIL-related events in interact.html. (Probably should see if those can be safely moved to the separate animations module.)
The other thing that is borrowed from SMIL is <switch>, and we have a normative reference for the allowReorder behavior. So at the very least the ref should stay for that.
Wondering whether WOFF 2 should be added, alongside WOFF 1?
Possibly as an informative ref? Right now we say that WOFF (level 1) support is required, it would be a normative change to bump that up to WOFF2.
I don't understand why we have references to both HTML 5.1 2nd Edition and also HTML LS.
Because no one has gone through and updated all the references & links to W3C HTML to point to their matching places in WHATWG. I don't think there are any details we need to reference that are only in the W3C versions.
Activity
svgeesus commentedon Aug 5, 2018
Hopefully fixed by #515
svgeesus commentedon Aug 20, 2018
Normative Refs includes Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Views Specification
I don't find DOM Views in HTML5 (or in DOM LS either).
svgeesus commentedon Aug 20, 2018
I don't understand why we have references to both HTML 5.1 2nd Edition and also HTML LS. Can refs to the former simply be converted to reference the latter? Is there some specific W3C-only functionality that we need (and is implemented)?
svgeesus commentedon Aug 20, 2018
W3C URL spec says
Replacing with direct link to URL LS.
svgeesus commentedon Aug 20, 2018
Do we really still have a normative dependency on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ?
svgeesus commentedon Aug 20, 2018
Wondering whether WOFF 2 should be added, alongside WOFF 1?
AmeliaBR commentedon Aug 20, 2018
Because no one has gone through and updated all the references & links to W3C HTML to point to their matching places in WHATWG. I don't think there are any details we need to reference that are only in the W3C versions.
It looks like we still have definitions of SMIL-related events in interact.html. (Probably should see if those can be safely moved to the separate animations module.)
The other thing that is borrowed from SMIL is
<switch>, and we have a normative reference for theallowReorderbehavior. So at the very least the ref should stay for that.Possibly as an informative ref? Right now we say that WOFF (level 1) support is required, it would be a normative change to bump that up to WOFF2.
svgeesus commentedon Aug 21, 2018
Wondering why we reference DOM Level 1
normative references updated, for #514
svgeesus commentedon Aug 21, 2018
Okay, I will go through and do that.
Change from HTML 5.1 to HTML LS, #514
svgeesus commentedon Sep 18, 2018
#544
Change from HTML 5.1 to HTML LS, #514 (#544)
svgeesus commentedon Sep 22, 2018
I think this can be closed now.