Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Jacobian-Guided Anisotropic Noise Reshaping for Enhancing Representation Utility under Local Differential Privacy

This repository contains the official experimental code for the paper:

Jacobian-Guided Anisotropic Noise Reshaping for Enhancing Representation Utility under Local Differential Privacy

Youngmok Ha¹, Viktor Schlegel², Yidan Sun², and Anil Anthony Bharath¹²

¹ Imperial College London ² Imperial College London, Imperial Global Singapore

Contact: y.ha25@imperial.ac.uk

Y. Ha conducted this research at Imperial College London while on leave from the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.


Overview

Standard Local Differential Privacy (LDP) mechanisms inject isotropic noise uniformly across all feature directions, which often degrades utility on downstream tasks unnecessarily.

The proposed approach (PA) introduces an anisotropic noise shaping methodology that utilizes the Jacobian of the downstream task to rotate and scale the noise distribution — ensuring that task-sensitive directions receive proportionally less noise, while task-insensitive directions absorb more. This preserves the privacy guarantee (ε-LDP) while improving downstream utility.


Repository Structure

.
├── mechanisms/
│   └── mechanisms.py                          # All LDP mechanism implementations (shared)
├── cifar10-resnet20-classification-accuracy/  # Task 1: CIFAR-10 classification
├── mnist-vae-mlp-classification-accuracy/     # Task 2: MNIST classification
└── user-level-linear-regression-accuracy/     # Task 3: User-level linear regression

Evaluation Tasks

Task 1 — CIFAR-10 Classification (ResNet-20 Features)

Directory: cifar10-resnet20-classification-accuracy/

Applies LDP to 64-dim penultimate-layer features of a ResNet-20 trained on CIFAR-10, then classifies the decoded vector. Accuracy is averaged over all 10,000 test samples.

  • Classifier types: linear FC head or MLP (relu / gelu / sigmoid / tanh / leaky_relu)
  • Evaluation grid: ε ∈ {0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 7.5, 10}
  • Supports ablation study and distribution-shift evaluation (CIFAR-10-C)
  • See cifar10-resnet20-classification-accuracy/README.md

Task 2 — MNIST Classification (VAE Latent Space)

Directory: mnist-vae-mlp-classification-accuracy/

Applies LDP to VAE latent vectors (D ∈ {16, 32, 64}), decodes, and classifies with a jointly trained MLP. Accuracy is averaged over all 10,000 test samples.

Task 3 — User-Level Linear Regression (London Smart Meters)

Directory: user-level-linear-regression-accuracy/

User-level ε-LDP evaluation on household energy data: each private household participates in at most one aggregation across all rounds, giving a strict ε-per-household guarantee. Utility measured as RMSE against actual next-day energy consumption.


LDP Mechanisms (mechanisms/mechanisms.py)

All mechanisms satisfy ε-LDP (pure) or (ε, δ)-LDP with δ = 1e-5. Clipping radii ρ are set to the 90th percentile of the corresponding norm over the public training set.

Name Type Description
NoNoise No perturbation; upper bound
Laplace(L1) ε-LDP L1 clip + Laplace noise
AGM (ε,δ)-LDP L2 clip + Gaussian (Balle & Wang 2018)
PrivUnit2(Opt) ε-LDP Spherical step-function on S^{d-1}
PrivUnitG(MC) ε-LDP Gaussian ambient-space step-function (MC)
PrivUnitG(Paper) ε-LDP PrivUnitG with paper-exact parameters
CW(Laplace)+PA ε-LDP PA + coordinate-wise i.n.i.d. Laplace
CW(AGM)+PA (ε,δ)-LDP PA + coordinate-wise i.n.i.d. Gaussian
PLAN(Pub) (ε,δ)-LDP Variance-aware scaling + Gaussian
PLAN(Paper) (ε,δ)-LDP PLAN Algorithm 1 (Aumüller et al. 2024)
Inst-Opt (ε,δ)-LDP Hadamard rotation + median shift + optimal L2 clip
Task-Aware ε-LDP Cholesky whitening + water-filling (linear downstream models only)
*+PA same Any mechanism above with PA anisotropic pre/post-processing

PA Transform

Row-space extraction (compute_jacobian_row_space):

  • Stack per-sample Jacobians J_i ∈ ℝ^{K×D} into B ∈ ℝ^{(n·K)×D}.
  • SVD with gap-based rank threshold → W_eff ∈ ℝ^{r×D} (effective rank r).

SV-weighted λ allocation (Lagrange optimum for min Σ s_i² λ_i s.t. Σ 1/√λ_i = C):

1/√λ_i ∝ s_i^{2/3}   (row space, i = 1…r)
1/√λ_i = 1/√λ_N      (null space, i = r+1…d,  λ_N = 1000)

ANR (Anisotropic Noise Reshaping) rotates the representation space by the Jacobian row space of the downstream task model so that task-sensitive directions receive proportionally less noise.

Pre-process  (Encode):  \bar{z}     =  clip( (z − μ) @ U ⊙ (1/√λ) )
         [add noise in \bar{Z}-space]
Post-process (Decode):  z_dec = (\bar{z}_noisy ⊙ √λ) @ U.T + μ

Quick Start

Each task is self-contained. Install dependencies and follow the step-by-step instructions in each subdirectory's README.

# Prerequisites: Python 3.10, PyTorch (CUDA or CPU)
pip install torch==2.7.1+cu118 torchvision==0.22.1+cu118 \
    --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu118

# Task 1: CIFAR-10
cd cifar10-resnet20-classification-accuracy
pip install -r requirements.txt
python train_resnet20.py
python eval_cifar_classification.py

# Task 2: MNIST
cd mnist-vae-mlp-classification-accuracy
pip install -r requirements.txt
python train_vae.py --dim 64
python train_classifier.py --dim 64
python eval_mlp_classification.py --dim 64

# Task 3: London Smart Meters
cd user-level-linear-regression-accuracy
pip install -r requirements.txt
python download_data.py
python prepare_data.py --window 16 --target energy_mean
python train_regressor.py --window 16 --target energy_mean
python eval_regression.py --window 16 --target energy_mean

References

  • PA: Ha, Y., Schlegel, V., Sun, Y., & Bharath, A. A. (2026). Jacobian-Guided Anisotropic Noise Reshaping for Utility Enhancement Under Local Differential Privacy. arXiv.
  • CW: Muthukrishnan, G., & Kalyani, S. (2025). Differential Privacy With Higher Utility by Exploiting Coordinate-Wise Disparity. IEEE TIFS.
  • PLAN: Aumüller, M., Lebeda, C. J., Nelson, B., & Pagh, R. (2024). PLAN: Variance-Aware Private Mean Estimation. PETs.
  • PrivUnitG: Asi, H., Feldman, V., & Talwar, K. (2022). Optimal Algorithms for Mean Estimation under Local Differential Privacy. ICML.
  • Inst-Opt: Huang, Z., Liang, Y., & Yi, K. (2021). Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacy. NeurIPS.
  • AGM: Balle, B., & Wang, Y.-X. (2018). Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy. ICML.
  • PrivUnit2: Bhowmick, A. et al. (2018). Protection Against Reconstruction. arXiv:1812.00984.
  • Task-Aware: Cheng, X. et al. (2022). Locally Differentially Private Functional Statistics. ICML.
  • Duchi: Duchi, J., Jordan, M. I., & Wainwright, M. J. (2013). Local Privacy and Statistical Minimax Rates. FOCS.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Used by

Contributors

Languages