The question we should continually insist on asking ourselves, both as makers of tools and users of them, is how they can help us improve the flow of love. Do they connect us with each other, and reinforce our instincts to treat each other as moral ends? Do they help us convey our love out into the world through information and interfaces, or help us know when we are being offered any?

I get what he’s saying, and there’s some nice prose here, but to me it seems like a whole lot of jibber-jabber. AI is making even the smartest people in my blogroll a bit loopy.

Stitch generates UIs for mobile and web applications, making design ideation fast and easy.

Karpathy’s wiki but for code: distills agent sessions into knowledge that then can be reused.

It’s been an interesting few weeks for counterexamples. This post is basically my perspective of what has been going on in the world of formalization, AI tools and, in particular, counterexamples.

Crazy shit, dog.

The fully open source Docker Desktop alternative built natively for Apple Silicon with blazing-fast performance. Run containers, Kubernetes, Firecracker VMs, and sandboxed AI agents at lightning speed.

Not actually written by Chomsky BTW

More than the tool it’s the principles outlined in this article that are interesting if you think about what are the parts/systems/rules that would make a harness successful.

short guide to build mcp servers (sample)