13 Jun 23
A recent Reddit post showcased a series of artistic QR codes created with Stable Diffusion. Those QR codes were generated with a custom-trained ControlNet
12 Jun 23
09 Jun 23
a brief academic paper that reviews the situations where automation ends up producing more work for humans, rather than less – posits that this is sort of the norm, because automation almost always adds a layer (or two) of complexity and abstraction on to a problem space. While not directly written about AI (this is from 1983) I feel it is a solid foundation from which to build discussion (in the negative) on AI in modern system.
08 Jun 23
07 Jun 23
06 Jun 23
05 Jun 23
27 May 23
24 May 23
AI Test Kitchen is a place where people can experience and give feedback on some of Google’s latest AI technologies. Our goal is to learn, improve, and innovate responsibly on AI together.
23 May 23
GigaBrain finds the most useful discussions on reddit and other communities. We sift through the noise and analyze billions of comments for you. Get real answers from real people.
19 May 23
AI-powered solution for generating 360° skyboxes from text prompts.
16 May 23
Proving you’re a human on a web flooded with generative AI content
15 May 23
in which 94-year-old noam chomsky verbally promenades uninterrupted on artificial intelligence and other things
94-years-old (how does he hold on to all this stuff still?)
maybe it’s zettelkasten
13 May 23
ChatGPT and other AI applications such as Midjourney have pushed “Artificial Intelligence” high on the hype cycle. In this article, I want to focus specifically on the energy cost of training and using applications like ChatGPT, what their widespread adoption could mean for global CO₂ emissions, and what we could do to limit these emissions.
Key points
- Training of large AI models is not the problem
- Large-scale use of large AI models would be unsustainable
- Renewables are not making AI more sustainable
The enormous energy requirement of these brute force statistical models is due to the following attributes:
- Requires millions or billions of training examples
- Requires many training cycles
- Requires retraining when presented with new information
- Requires many weights and lots of multiplication
ChatGPT and other AI applications such as Midjourney have pushed “Artificial Intelligence” high on the hype cycle. In this article, I want to focus specifically on the energy cost of training and using applications like ChatGPT, what their widespread adoption could mean for global CO₂ emissions, and what we could do to limit these emissions.
Key points
- Training of large AI models is not the problem
- Large-scale use of large AI models would be unsustainable
- Renewables are not making AI more sustainable
10 May 23
Appen is among dozens of companies that offer data-labeling services for the AI industry. If you’ve bought groceries on Instacart or looked up an employer on Glassdoor, you’ve benefited from such labeling behind the scenes. Most profit-maximizing algorithms, which underpin e-commerce sites, voice assistants, and self-driving cars, are based on deep learning, an AI technique that relies on scores of labeled examples to expand its capabilities.