Best Woman-Authored Books
Best books by a female author.
Tags:
author, best, biography, children, classic, fantasy, female, feminine, fiction, graphic-novels, historical-fiction, horror, literature, manga, memoir, memoirs, mystery, non-fiction, paranormal, philosophy, romance, science-fiction, self-help, young-adult
Y. L
1459 books
96 friends
96 friends
Sarah
624 books
63 friends
63 friends
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads
3378 books
860 friends
860 friends
Jyanx
5149 books
166 friends
166 friends
ღ Carol jinx~☆~☔ʚϊɞ
4016 books
461 friends
461 friends
Rain
2971 books
7 friends
7 friends
Savvy
1476 books
114 friends
114 friends
Dustin
9336 books
1391 friends
1391 friends
More voters…
Comments Showing 1-50 of 65 (65 new)
message 1:
by
Bob
(new)
Oct 20, 2012 08:40PM
Curious, Gone with the Wind is not on the list.
reply
|
flag
You could add it; it's easy to add books to lists. At the top of the list, at the tab next to "all votes."
You add books to lists at the top of the list, at the tab next to "all votes," not down in the comments section.
::sigh::
Where is it? I'll remove the E.B. White if I can find it.
ETA: Found Charlotte's Web, will remove it.
Where is it? I'll remove the E.B. White if I can find it.
ETA: Found Charlotte's Web, will remove it.
13 more voters than people who rated; that's impressive.
Also not very convincing.
ETA: Whoa, 6 ratings, 35 votes!
Also not very convincing.
ETA: Whoa, 6 ratings, 35 votes!
I think all books that have more votes than ratings should be disqualified. These lists really aren't much fun when authors take unfair advantage of the voting system to plug their books.
Susanna wrote: "You could add it; it's easy to add books to lists. At the top of the list, at the tab next to "all votes.""
Wow, I need to read that...
Wow, I need to read that...
>Women were once forbidden to read and write
Not exactly.... This was never true in the vast majority of societies.
Not exactly.... This was never true in the vast majority of societies.
I added some great literary fiction by important women who are alive and writing today. I feel good about this :)
This is quite frustrating to find that Lois Lowry features high in the list (while her style is actually quite poor) as compared to Isabel Allende and when you see that there is no book by Zelda Fitzgerald! Save me the Waltz is a must-read, guys!
Librarians regularly check for duplicates on this list, Rachel, so if you can't find a book you want to vote for, just add it and it will be combined with its other votes in short order.
I wish there was a way to search a list because I don't want to make duplicates but it is hard to sort through 20 pages to vote.
I can guarantee that the duplicates won't last long, Sharmon. You could also try looking at which of the lists the most popular edition of the book you wish to add is on. If the book shows up at a certain position on this list, you can click on the link and it'll take you to the page the book is on.
I'd just add it; I reflexively combine duplicates pretty much every time I visit a list, and I don't think I'm the only librarian with that habit.
Does this list include women who wrote under a pseudonym? A lot of women wrote under males names in certain time periods or if it suited more (e.g George Elliot, lot of female sci-fi/fantasy writers, etc.). Just don't want to miss some of the greats, or finally give women their due.
Lauren wrote: "Does this list include women who wrote under a pseudonym? A lot of women wrote under males names in certain time periods or if it suited more (e.g George Elliot, lot of female sci-fi/fantasy write..."
Just slowly scroll down the list which is about 30 pages and you will see them.
Just slowly scroll down the list which is about 30 pages and you will see them.
Couldn't find that one - another librarian may have gotten it.
Did remove:
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet by Michael Rosen
Did remove:
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet by Michael Rosen
#953 Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children, Ransom Riggs looks for all the world like a man to me in his profile here on Goodreads.
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads wrote: "You add books at the top of the list, at the tab next to "all votes.""
Thank you, Susanna. I apologize for doing it the wrong way. I will try to correct this tomorrow.
Thank you, Susanna. I apologize for doing it the wrong way. I will try to correct this tomorrow.
Donna wrote: "Oh hot damn, it worked. 3 duplicates were discovered and removed by the system."
Oh good, I was wondering about that. Thanks Donna.
Oh good, I was wondering about that. Thanks Donna.
Twilight is better than Fountainhead? Well, okay. But Hunger Games is BEST BOOK EVER in the history of the world according to goodreads BEST EVER, so why isn't it #1 here?
Oh, and Go Set a Watchman (#225, and possibly the worst book ever written) is better than Goldfinch, which won a Pulitzer? Sometimes I just don't get it.
Mockingjay at 352 makes sense, but in what world is it better than Dame Agatha Christie's brilliant "Murder of Roger Akroyd"?
Tale of Genji, over 1000 years old, is at 873. Okay, I sorta get it, anything over 250 pages is no good. Good to know. Still, Tale of Genji now has Three, count em, 3 WHOLE VOTES as I voted for it.
Greg wrote: "There are 4,990 books by female writers better than Woolf's "The Waves"!!!!!"
If you're going to rant rather than contribute to the discussion regarding efforts to maintain this list, at least confine yourself to a single comment box rather than mewling and puking everywhere.
If you're going to rant rather than contribute to the discussion regarding efforts to maintain this list, at least confine yourself to a single comment box rather than mewling and puking everywhere.
Aubrey wrote: "Greg wrote: "There are 4,990 books by female writers better than Woolf's "The Waves"!!!!!"
If you're going to rant rather than contribute to the discussion regarding efforts to maintain this list,..."
Amen.
If you're going to rant rather than contribute to the discussion regarding efforts to maintain this list,..."
Amen.
Argh. I am a librarian and I'm having a hard time resisting the urge to delete the Harry Potter book set. The single titles are listed farther down in the list so basically they are being voted on twice. I even voted for one of the single volumes so it's not that I don't like J.K. Rawling's books. But jeeze, this Harry Potter thing is a bit much. The creator of the list did not instruct "no book sets". And I don't want to get banned. Maybe as the Harry Potter readers get older and wiser they'll see the error of their ways and come back to this list and remove their votes for the book set. One can only hope.
Elyse wrote: "Aubrey wrote: "I agree, we could have far more women of color in the top 100 than we currently do."
Thanks for reminding me. I finished Mama Day by Gloria Naylor last month, gave it 5 stars, and j..."
It's also incredibly English speaking centred I thought...
Thanks for reminding me. I finished Mama Day by Gloria Naylor last month, gave it 5 stars, and j..."
It's also incredibly English speaking centred I thought...
Dr wrote: "Silver Linings True stories of resilience from a General Practice By Dr Mrin Nayagam."
Nobody will add this title for you. If you want to add it, go to the top of the list. On the right hand side, above the list, is a tab that you click on to add books. Then put the title in the little bar that appears and click the button that will be offered that says Vote for this book (or something similar). Cluttering up the technical discussion queue is not only a complete fail in terms of getting your book on the list, but it summons volunteer librarians like me, who think the list needs editing. We come along to help and discover it's just someone either spamming the list with their own book (bad author behavior), or else someone that hasn't checked the directions. I'm going back to bed now. Goodbye.
Nobody will add this title for you. If you want to add it, go to the top of the list. On the right hand side, above the list, is a tab that you click on to add books. Then put the title in the little bar that appears and click the button that will be offered that says Vote for this book (or something similar). Cluttering up the technical discussion queue is not only a complete fail in terms of getting your book on the list, but it summons volunteer librarians like me, who think the list needs editing. We come along to help and discover it's just someone either spamming the list with their own book (bad author behavior), or else someone that hasn't checked the directions. I'm going back to bed now. Goodbye.
Caitlin wrote: "John Green is also on here, who is not a women."
Where? Give me a page number and a book title and I'll take care of it, but I don't want to sift through 53 pages.
Where? Give me a page number and a book title and I'll take care of it, but I don't want to sift through 53 pages.
Related News
A nice thing about the end of one year is that it’s traditionally followed by another year, which means 12 more months of new books to...
Anyone can add books to this list.