What do you like best about Lattice?
🌱 1. Performance Reviews That Don’t Suck
Why It’s Loved:
Lattice transforms performance reviews from once-a-year obligations into continuous, structured conversations.
The interface is clean, easy to use, and customizable by HR.
Supports 360 reviews, self-assessments, peer feedback, and manager evaluations.
✅ Benefit:
Encourages growth-focused feedback instead of just evaluation.
Saves HR and managers hours per cycle.
Employees feel seen, heard, and developed, not just judged.
🗺️ 2. Goal & OKR Tracking
Why It’s Loved:
Teams can set goals at the individual, team, and company level.
Real-time progress updates are visible across the org.
Goals can be tied to reviews or feedback for alignment.
✅ Benefit:
Increases transparency and alignment across teams.
Helps employees connect their work to big-picture objectives.
Fosters accountability and focus. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Lattice?
🧩 1. Can Feel Overly Complex at First
Issue:
The platform is packed with features: performance reviews, 1:1s, OKRs, engagement surveys, feedback, analytics, etc.
New users often find it intimidating to navigate or adopt all at once.
⚠️ Impact:
Teams may underutilize key features without proper training.
Onboarding takes time for both HR and individual employees.
🔄 2. Too Much Manual Input
Issue:
Users often need to manually update goals, fill in review inputs, and log talking points.
There’s limited automation or integrations for pulling performance data from tools like Jira, Salesforce, etc.
⚠️ Impact:
Goal tracking and review inputs can become a chore if not maintained regularly.
Risk of reviews becoming a check-the-box exercise.
📅 3. Notifications and Nudges Can Be Annoying
Issue:
Lattice sends frequent reminders to complete reviews, update goals, or prep for 1:1s.
While helpful, some users feel overwhelmed or nagged—especially during review cycles.
⚠️ Impact:
Can lead to notification fatigue and employees tuning out important prompts.
📉 4. Limited Customization for Some Features
Issue:
Some users feel constrained by rigid review templates, goal structures, or survey question banks.
Fine-grained permissions or workflow customizations may be lacking depending on the org's size and needs.
⚠️ Impact:
Larger or more specialized orgs may need workarounds or admin-heavy solutions.
🧾 5. Historical Data Isn't Always Easy to Surface
Issue:
While you can view past reviews and feedback, some users report it’s not intuitive to find or analyze trends over time.
Feedback history across teams or managers can get fragmented.
⚠️ Impact:
Harder for managers or HR to make informed promotion or coaching decisions quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.