buc.ci is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
abucci@bucci.onl
Admin account
@abucci@buc.ci

Search results for tag #copyright

AodeRelay boosted

[?]C. » 🌐
@cazabon@mindly.social

Project LLM Contribution Policy

We will happily accept contributions that use LLM in their creation, as long as the following conditions are met.

1. Model is open-source.
2. Model training data is documented, is all used with written permission of the owner or is documented as public-domain.
3. Model training data is available for other parties to study and use.
4. Submitter verifies that they have reviewed and understand all code they are submitting, and can answer questions and concerns during a code review.
5. The submission meets all other project standards required of contributions.
6. Submitter acknowledges that, as a product of an LLM, they do not have copyright or other intellectual property claims on the submitted material - it is submitted as public domain content, to be used by the project as it wishes.

Please let us know when you find or create a model that can meet 1-3, and an LLM-enthused contributor who can meet 4-6.

    AodeRelay boosted

    [?]Emeritus Prof Christopher May » 🌐
    @ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us

    The Govt. has stepped back from its 'preferred option' of reforming copyright law to allow expanded (unrestricted) use of content after extensive opposition from the creative industries in the UK.

    The next step may well be further consideration of other reforms, but we can also expect a lot of blackmail-like lobbying from AI firms claiming they will withdraw from the UK if their casual theft of content is halted... many might say: god riddance!

    theguardian.com/technology/202

      AodeRelay boosted

      [?]Michael Marek » 🌐
      @mimarek@universeodon.com

      Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster are suing OpenAI.

      They claim ChatGPT produces "near-verbatim" copies of Britannica's ​encyclopedia entries, dictionary definitions and other content, and falsely attributes halucinations to them.

      reuters.com/legal/litigation/e

        AodeRelay boosted

        [?]Elshara Silverheart » 🌐
        @elshara@www.mediacy.net

        I'll just put this here for the in case anyone wants to me about it later.

        I with back in January to and now the site's knocked literally.

        I paid like C$120.00 for the online form of the just to disappear.

        Yeah ok has them moving every other day but it was a lot more stable than that before I gave them a leg up.

        This is why I hate centralized and hosting.

        This is why works by connecting to the as a whole.

        If you use anything less, you will face more challenges hosting and unfortunately, it is as as that.

        You cannot convince me that is not turning into as it seems as though the and the industry has eluded to colluding with one another to obtain for.

        Guys, I don't know what to say anymore. I'm a huge fan of and and and I long for the day that the doesn't need to get a cut of everything I or anywhere, especially for over all.

        Please do whatever you can to fight where ever they appear. I want humanity to have better access to and built by real people in a fair and consistent manner.

        I always am striving and trying my best to be a better being.

          [?]AA » 🌐
          @AAKL@infosec.exchange

          Is it just me or is Valve suddenly being targeted?

          - New York sues Valve over loot boxes.

          - FBI launches an investigation into indie malware-infested games on Steam

          Lastly:

          PC Gamer: Notorious UK rights group launches legal action against Valve for distributing music in games on Steam without a license pcgamer.com/games/notorious-uk

            AodeRelay boosted

            [?]Miguel Afonso Caetano » 🌐
            @remixtures@tldr.nettime.org

            "Even worse was the suggestion by Grammarly’s A.I. version of me to replace the first sentence of the news article with an anecdotal opening describing a fictional person named Laura whose privacy had been violated.

            “Laura, a patient searching for relief from a chronic condition, clicks through her hospital’s website to schedule an appointment. In just a few moments, her most private medical details — her reason for visiting, her doctor’s name and even the treatment she seeks — are quietly sent to Facebook, without her knowledge,” the bot suggested with a button allowing the user to paste that excerpt straight into the article.

            Replacing a factual sentence with an imagined story about a person who doesn’t exist is not only bad editing. It’s a deception that could end my career as a journalist (or the career of any journalist who took that terrible advice).

            And this is the problem with A.I. It doesn’t know truth from fiction. It doesn’t know an investigative news article from an offhand comment. It flattens all content into word associations.

            What Grammarly made wasn’t a doppelgänger. As the writer Ingrid Burrington wrote on Bluesky, it was a sloppelgänger — A.I. slop masquerading as a person.

            And it must be stopped."

            nytimes.com/2026/03/13/opinion

              AodeRelay boosted

              [?]PrivacyDigest » 🌐
              @PrivacyDigest@mas.to

              Bullying vs.

              The government should not help a religious institution to punish or deter members from inquiring about their faith. Yet, once again, the and Tract Society is trying to use flimsy copyright claims to exploit the special legal tools available to copyright owners in order to unmask online speakers.

              eff.org/deeplinks/2026/03/copy

                [?]Strypey » 🌐
                @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz

                If IBM are willfully breaking copyright licensing law, which depends on contract law, why the hell should the rest of us follow it by complying with the gag order on RHEL code in their customer contracts?!?

                Come to think of it, if major corporations are ignoring the spirit of copyright, they're implicitly saying it no longer matters. Maybe it's time for the rest of us to give it the middle finger too, and instruct our (presumably) democratic governments to stop enforcing it?

                (5/?)

                  AodeRelay boosted

                  [?]AA » 🌐
                  @AAKL@infosec.exchange

                  "On Thursday, the White House posted an image with the words “make america great again” designed to imitate Pokémon’s game Pokémon Pokopia, which was released this week."

                  Dexerto: Nintendo responds after US government’s Pokopia post goes viral dexerto.com/pokemon/nintendo-r @Dexerto

                  Time: Why Pokemon Is Pushing Back Against the White House time.com/7382839/pokemon-dhs-w @time @time

                    [?]Taran Rampersad » 🌐
                    @knowprose@mastodon.social

                    @baldur with the recent supreme court ruling on works created by llms being unable to be copyrighted...

                    is for humans.

                    I ain't a lawyer. But that's an obvious problem for and works.

                    An odd way to come at it for some, but there it is. From .

                    theverge.com/policy/887678/sup

                      AodeRelay boosted

                      [?]MissConstrue » 🌐
                      @MissConstrue@mefi.social

                      Hey! Good news everyone! The , by declining to overrule the Office, has declared that art cannot be copyrighted.

                      It's bigger than just Thaler's case though. (links below) What this means is that NO AI created work can be copyrighted. Not code, not verbiage, not art, not anything.

                      Only human created works are eligible for copyright, so sayeth the High Court.

                      Cory (@pluralistic) does a fantastic job of explaining the details and rounding up links. As he always does. Where he finds the hours in the day, I will never know. ;)

                      pluralistic.net/2026/03/03/its

                      Archive link to because something on the page was blowing up my browser, but they have more details on the case itself, and the "art" in question which just saved real artists: archive.md/bsyrQ

                        AodeRelay boosted

                        [?]Troed Sångberg » 🌐
                        @troed@swecyb.com

                        It looks like - at least in the US - software generated with an LLM can't be copyrighted. This includes software where it's not possible to discern which parts have been created using LLMs and which have not.

                        This applies to Open Source as well. Those licenses we use to make sure our code isn't used in various ways we don't approve of become invalid if we don't have any copyright to begin with.

                        IANAL - have at it.

                          AodeRelay boosted

                          [?]Ivana Daskalovic » 🌐
                          @ivana@infosec.exchange

                          RiP!: A Remix Manifesto (2006)

                          1. Culture always builds on the past.
                          2. The past always tries to control the future.
                          3. Our future is becoming less free.
                          4. To build free societies you must limit the control of the past.

                          archive.org/details/rip-a-remi

                            AodeRelay boosted

                            [?]internetarchive » 🌐
                            @internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org

                            🎬📚 Just dropped: MYSTERY COPYRIGHT THEATER 2026!

                            Two of the @AuthorsAlliance crew talk back to the screen about works that entered the public domain, untangling the weird, wild, and confusing world of copyright law with irreverent but relevant commentary.

                            Watch the full short 👇
                            archive.org/details/mct2026

                              AodeRelay boosted

                              [?]Steven Saus [he/him] » 🌐
                              @StevenSaus@faithcollapsing.com

                              uspol [SENSITIVE CONTENT]

                              AIs can generate near-verbatim copies of novels from training data

                              LLMs memorize more training data than previously thought.


                              arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/ais -jailbreak -training

                              Library shelves filled with books

                              Alt...Library shelves filled with books

                                AodeRelay boosted

                                [?]C. » 🌐
                                @cazabon@mindly.social

                                Cory Doctorow, a fellow , writes a lot of interesting stuff. I agree with his positions on many things, but not all. For example, I'm about ten thousand percent behind his opposition to anti-circumvention laws; I was one of the thousands of Canadians who wrote to the government opposing the introduction of the law many years ago.

                                However, his blog on Thursday, staking out the position that opposition to "AI" (LLM) is just geeky culture is somewhere between "flat-out wrong" and "disingenuous at best".

                                My position against everywhere is both because of and practical ones. There does not exist an LLM right now that was built and trained ethically; they are all statistical plagiarism machines, and speaking as someone whose and has been plagiarized by every single one of them, that pisses me off, royally.

                                That's a show-stopper for me, but even if it wasn't, the concerns - that the output is , that the can't be checked, that the is and , that the status is unclear, that it's a violation - are *also* enough to rule out at present.

                                He then presents a argument - all tech is fruit of the poisoned tree, the was invented by a racist, etc. But William Shockley is not designing or manufacturing any of the transistors / I use today.

                                So, @doctorow - I gotta say I disagree. And that's fine.

                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                  [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
                                  @kkarhan@infosec.space

                                  @xssfox well, is common in "" juristictions like the where (even if the is clearly invalid and wrong) is cheaper, faster and less problematic than standing one's ground.

                                    AodeRelay boosted

                                    [?]Radio_Azureus » 🌐
                                    @Radio_Azureus@ioc.exchange

                                    We're all sick of this AI shit

                                    Hear RIck giving a well balanced opinion about spotify artificially pushing BS LLM generated crappy music

                                    It's made from stolen real artist work and fragmented mixed regurgetated to this crappy song

                                    youtube.com/watch?v=7XGct4rbYfI

                                      AodeRelay boosted

                                      [?]Stuff I found » 🌐
                                      @stuffifound@pixelfed.social

                                      Just when he got released from copyright prison...

                                      #mickeymouse #disney #mouse #mousetrap #shithappens #comedy #humour #satire #copyright #copyleft #anticapitalism

                                      Drawing of Mickey Mouse killed by a mouse trap, captioned "shit happens"

                                      Alt...Drawing of Mickey Mouse killed by a mouse trap, captioned "shit happens"

                                        [?]petersuber » 🌐
                                        @petersuber@fediscience.org

                                        " limit access due to scraping concerns."
                                        niemanlab.org/2026/01/news-pub

                                        PS: I'm one who thinks AI training on copyrighted content is and (separate point) even desirable in the case of academic research.
                                        fediscience.org/@petersuber/11

                                        But this kind of training will create huge collateral damage --indirectly through publisher action -- if it diminishes the @internetarchive.

                                          AodeRelay boosted

                                          [?]petersuber » 🌐
                                          @petersuber@fediscience.org

                                          Update. It's happening. "News Publishers Are Now Blocking The Internet Archive, And We May All Regret It."
                                          techdirt.com/2026/02/13/news-p

                                          @mmasnick is right: "In our rush to punish companies, we’re destroying public goods that serve everyone…We’re sacrificing the historical record not because of proven harm, but because publishers are worried about what might happen. That’s a hell of a tradeoff."


                                          @internetarchive

                                            [?]MissConstrue » 🌐
                                            @MissConstrue@mefi.social

                                            "What if there was a way for a business to transform any conduct it disliked into a felony, harnessing the power of the state to threaten anyone who acted in a way that displeased the company with a long prison sentence and six-figure fines?

                                            Surprise! That actually exists! It's called Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the "" clause, which establishes five-year sentences and $500k fines for anyone who bypasses an "effective access control" for a copyrighted work."

                                            Let Cory (@pluralistic) explain it. He's good at explaining , or as the rest of us call it, the 21st goddamn century.

                                            As an aside, there should be a branch of the Judicial tree that is staffed by people who understand technology and the implications therein. (Just sayin, as someone who had thousands of pages of material stolen "fairly" for LLM.) These courts don't understand what they're ruling on.

                                            pluralistic.net/2026/02/07/aim

                                              AodeRelay boosted

                                              [?]AA » 🌐
                                              @AAKL@infosec.exchange

                                              AP: Hollywood groups condemn ByteDance’s AI video generator, claiming copyright infringement apnews.com/article/ai-seedance @AssociatedPress

                                                AodeRelay boosted

                                                [?]Glyn Moody » 🌐
                                                @glynmoody@mastodon.social

                                                AodeRelay boosted

                                                [?]AA » 🌐
                                                @AAKL@infosec.exchange

                                                It's not your content, Google. You stole it from others.

                                                Futurism: Google Says People Are Copying Its AI Without Its Permission, Much Like It Scraped Everybody’s Data Without Asking to Create Its AI in the First Place futurism.com/future-society/go @Futurism

                                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                                  [?]Glyn Moody » 🌐
                                                  @glynmoody@mastodon.social

                                                  Subpoenas Can’t Be Used for Foreign Lawsuits, Court Rules - torrentfreak.com/dmca-subpoena interesting ruling

                                                    AodeRelay boosted

                                                    [?]petersuber » 🌐
                                                    @petersuber@fediscience.org

                                                    Bravo to the Spanish Supreme Court for its Sept 2025 decision establishing four important principles: "[1] Access to source code can be needed to verify automated government decisions;
                                                    [2] “Intellectual property rights” do not automatically block transparency; [3] Security concerns must be balanced against democratic accountability; and [4] Transparency is especially critical for systems affecting social rights."
                                                    civio.app.box.com/s/2gcrxy4mkp

                                                    h/t (@fsfe) for this article about it.
                                                    fsfe.org/news/2026/news-202602

                                                      AodeRelay boosted

                                                      [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
                                                      @kkarhan@infosec.space

                                                      @blogdiva generally the is bad - period!

                                                      • needs to be dialed back to 25 years flat!

                                                      We don't allow to last lifetime + 70 years either...

                                                        AodeRelay boosted

                                                        [?]Stan Stewart aka muz4now » 🌐
                                                        @muz4now@mastodon.world

                                                        AodeRelay boosted

                                                        [?]Ecologia Digital » 🌐
                                                        @josemurilo@mato.social

                                                        "Incredibly enough, there is a really simple way to [protect artists from ]…

                                                        The has maintained—correctly—that works cannot be copyrighted… That is why the “monkey selfie” is in the . is only awarded to works of human creative expression that are fixed in a tangible medium.

                                                        …they have defended this principle vigorously in court, repeatedly winning judgments to uphold it." @pluralistic

                                                        theguardian.com/us-news/ng-int

                                                          [?]Zhi Zhu 🕸️ » 🌐
                                                          @ZhiZhu@newsie.social

                                                          "the Copyright Office has maintained – correctly – that AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted, because is exclusively for humans...

                                                          if Getty or or Universal or Hearst newspapers use to generate works – then anyone else can take those works, copy them, sell them or give them away for nothing. And the only thing those companies hate more than paying creative workers, is having other people take their stuff without permission."
                                                          theguardian.com/us-news/ng-int

                                                          Text from article:
We need to protect artists from AI predation, not just create a new way for artists to be mad about their impoverishment.

Incredibly enough, there is a really simple way to do that. After more than 20 years of being consistently wrong and terrible for artists’ rights, the US Copyright Office has finally done something gloriously, wonderfully right. All through this AI bubble, the Copyright Office has maintained – correctly – that AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted, because copyright is exclusively for humans. That is why the “monkey selfie” is in the public domain. Copyright is only awarded to works of human creative expression that are fixed in a tangible medium.

And not only has the Copyright Office taken this position, they have defended it vigorously in court, repeatedly winning judgments to uphold this principle.

The fact that every AI-created work is in the public domain means that if Getty or Disney or Universal or Hearst newspapers use AI to generate works – then anyone else can take those works, copy them, sell them or give them away for nothing. And the only thing those companies hate more than paying creative workers, is having other people take their stuff without permission.

                                                          Alt...Text from article: We need to protect artists from AI predation, not just create a new way for artists to be mad about their impoverishment. Incredibly enough, there is a really simple way to do that. After more than 20 years of being consistently wrong and terrible for artists’ rights, the US Copyright Office has finally done something gloriously, wonderfully right. All through this AI bubble, the Copyright Office has maintained – correctly – that AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted, because copyright is exclusively for humans. That is why the “monkey selfie” is in the public domain. Copyright is only awarded to works of human creative expression that are fixed in a tangible medium. And not only has the Copyright Office taken this position, they have defended it vigorously in court, repeatedly winning judgments to uphold this principle. The fact that every AI-created work is in the public domain means that if Getty or Disney or Universal or Hearst newspapers use AI to generate works – then anyone else can take those works, copy them, sell them or give them away for nothing. And the only thing those companies hate more than paying creative workers, is having other people take their stuff without permission.

                                                            AodeRelay boosted

                                                            [?]nullagent » 🌐
                                                            @nullagent@partyon.xyz

                                                            Hey Washington, there's a profoundly bad law making its way through the state level.

                                                            This law, will require ALL 3d printers to send copies of the files you print directly to the government to be check against a database of "banned shapes".

                                                            Literally turning your 3d printer into spyware. And if you don't voluntarily turn your printer into a spy, you will be a class C Felon.

                                                            This law affects ALL CNC machines, not just 3dps.

                                                            youtube.com/watch?v=kS-9ISzMhB

                                                              AodeRelay boosted

                                                              [?]Matthew Rimmer » 🌐
                                                              @drrimmer@aus.social

                                                              Colin Hay ‘strenuously disapproves’ use of Down Under at March for Australia rallies theguardian.com/music/2026/jan

                                                              Former Men at Work frontman, who was born in Scotland and emigrated to Australia, tells anti-immigration protestors, ‘Go write your own song, leave mine alone’

                                                                AodeRelay boosted

                                                                [?]William » 🌐
                                                                @wm@mast.wmclark.com

                                                                “…Stanford and Yale researchers found compelling evidence that AI models are actually copying all that data, not “learning” from it. Specifically, four prominent LLMs — OpenAI’s GPT-4.1, Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro, xAI’s Grok 3, and Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonnet — happily reproduced lengthy excerpts from popular — and protected — works, with a stunning degree of accuracy.”
                                                                futurism.com/artificial-intell

                                                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                                                  [?]Matthew Rimmer » 🌐
                                                                  @drrimmer@aus.social

                                                                  'Until we repeal the anti-circumvention law, we can’t reverse-engineer the US’s cloud software, whether it’s a database, a word processor or a tractor, in order to swap out proprietary, American code for robust, open, auditable alternatives that will safeguard our digital sovereignty.' @doctorow theguardian.com/commentisfree/

                                                                    AodeRelay boosted

                                                                    [?]petersuber » 🌐
                                                                    @petersuber@fediscience.org

                                                                    Excellent argument from @pluralistic.
                                                                    pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c

                                                                    "Thanks to Trump's incontinent belligerence, we are on the cusp of a 'Post-American Internet,' a new digital nervous system for the 21st century. An internet that we can build without worrying about America's demands and priorities…The US trade representative has forced every one of its trading partners to adopt law, to facilitate the extraction of their own people's data and money by American firms…But there's a…response… that's just sitting there, begging to be tried: what about repealing anticircumvention law?"

                                                                      AodeRelay boosted

                                                                      [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
                                                                      @kkarhan@infosec.space

                                                                      This may be considered by some, I consider these : (no ragebait inteded!)

                                                                      If you have a problem with these, please kindly fuck off in silence!

                                                                      This list is non-exhaustive...

                                                                        AodeRelay boosted

                                                                        [?]Stefan Müller :verified: » 🌐
                                                                        @stefanmuelller@climatejustice.social

                                                                        Zu und :

                                                                        „Da würden The Velvet Underground doch womöglich ein Entlohnungssystem wie bei den Streamingdiensten vorziehen.“

                                                                        Ich kenne keinen Musiker, der an streaming reich geworden wäre. An Streaming werden nur die Plattformen reich. Und das beste Argument gegen Detlef Diedrichsen ist wohl, dass die Plattformen jetzt KI-Musik aus dem, was die Leute mögen, erzeugen und das ist dann „neu“ und die Plattformen müssen niemandem mehr etwas dafür bezahlen. Und was rauskommt ist Mittelmaß, das einer Bubble gefällt. Ohne Ecken. Ich finde das alles nur schrecklich.

                                                                        In der Wissenschaft diskutieren wir jetzt verschärft mit KI generierte Texte. @dingemansemark hat mich auf den Begriff „automatisiertes Plagiat“ hingewiesen. Das ist es was es ist.

                                                                        Wenn Bands andere Lieder covern, bekommen die noch was dafür. Wenn es nur der Einfluss ist, der sichtbar wird, so bleibt zumindest noch der Verweis in der Diskussion: Ah, The Jesus and Mary Chain haben sich von Velvet Underground inspirieren lassen. Sie mögen sie. Undenkbar dagegen: ChatGPT hat von Velvet Underground geklaut.

                                                                        „Ob diese Scheißmusik nun von Menschen oder KIs produziert wird, ist doch eigentlich herzlich egal.“

                                                                        Ich teile die Verachtung für Scheißmusik, aber es ist nicht egal.

                                                                        Selbst Dieter Bohlen, der seinen einzigen Hit auf 6 LPs immer wieder veröffentlicht hat, soll dafür Geld bekommen.

                                                                        taz.de/!6134508

                                                                          AodeRelay boosted

                                                                          [?]Wulfy—Speaker to the machines » 🌐
                                                                          @n_dimension@infosec.exchange

                                                                          @SuperDicq

                                                                          There (kinda) is a solution to combat
                                                                          And its...GREED

                                                                          Only human generated can be

                                                                          So if corpos want to keep control over their logo or IP, it has to be made by a human.

                                                                            AodeRelay boosted

                                                                            [?]Freezenet » 🌐
                                                                            @freezenet@noc.social

                                                                            CRTC Incurs Fourth Lawsuit Over Online Streaming Act (MPAC)

                                                                            The CRTC has, once again, been sued over the Online Streaming Act. This time, by the Motion Picture Association Canada and several others.

                                                                            freezenet.ca/crtc-incurs-fourt

                                                                              AodeRelay boosted

                                                                              [?]Freezenet » 🌐
                                                                              @freezenet@noc.social

                                                                              Online News Act, Online Streaming Act Challenged in CUSMA Negotiations

                                                                              The US is continuing to up the pressure to get a repeal of the Online News Act and the Online Streaming Act.

                                                                              freezenet.ca/online-news-act-o

                                                                                AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                [?]S. K. Riley » 🌐
                                                                                @SKRiley_Author@universeodon.com

                                                                                Amazon suggests authors remove DRM from their titles, for ‘convenience’. But they neglect to remind authors that Digital Rights Management (DRM) protects Author Copyright under US, EU and French Copyright Laws, preventing others from copying or reusing their content.

                                                                                An analogue clock that reads 4 o’clock rests beside a stack of hardcover books on a green lawn. One of them is open, with the shade of a tree beginning to cover the pages.

                                                                                Alt...An analogue clock that reads 4 o’clock rests beside a stack of hardcover books on a green lawn. One of them is open, with the shade of a tree beginning to cover the pages.

                                                                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                  [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
                                                                                  @kkarhan@infosec.space

                                                                                  @pluralistic and now you know.why I.think. should be limited to a flat 25 years with no exceptions!

                                                                                  youtube.com/watch?v=yE6PWjm6Sk4

                                                                                    AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                    [?]Glyn Moody » 🌐
                                                                                    @glynmoody@mastodon.social

                                                                                    takes a Viking swing at -enabled piracy - theregister.com/2025/12/15/den denmark placing above

                                                                                      AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                      [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
                                                                                      @kkarhan@infosec.space

                                                                                      AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                      [?]Dave Rahardja » 🌐
                                                                                      @drahardja@sfba.social

                                                                                      With licensing its characters to OpenAI/Sora, I’m convinced more than ever that applying laws to AI will only lead to the strengthening of IP-hoarding incumbents. It will not slow down AI; it will only create another class of parasitic gatekeepers that monetize labor without paying workers.

                                                                                      Disney is not interested in enforcing its copyright to *stop* AI; it’s interested in enforcing its copyright to *profit* from AI.

                                                                                      humancode.us/2024/05/15/copyri

                                                                                        AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                        [?]Bupu » 🌐
                                                                                        @bupu@lgbtqia.space

                                                                                        There's a new government of Canada official petition to bring the same rights to likeness that Denmark recently passed to protect people from their body or voice being used by AI without their consent.

                                                                                        If you're Canadian, sign and share!

                                                                                        ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Pet

                                                                                          AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                          [?]Matthew Rimmer » 🌐
                                                                                          @drrimmer@aus.social

                                                                                          US Supreme Court leans toward internet service providers in copyright battle with nation’s music industry edition.cnn.com/2025/12/01/pol

                                                                                            AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                            [?]Steven Saus [he/him] » 🌐
                                                                                            @StevenSaus@faithcollapsing.com

                                                                                            uspol [SENSITIVE CONTENT]

                                                                                            (01 Dec) OpenAI desperate to avoid explaining why it deleted pirated book datasets

                                                                                            OpenAI risks increased fines after deleting pirated books datasets.

                                                                                            s.faithcollapsing.com/165n9

                                                                                            -infringement -piracy -books -data

                                                                                            An image pulled automatically from the post for decorative purposes only.

                                                                                            Alt...An image pulled automatically from the post for decorative purposes only.

                                                                                              AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                              [?]Yale Privacy Lab » 🌐
                                                                                              @yaleprivacylab@privacysafe.social

                                                                                              RE: privacysafe.social/@profdiggit

                                                                                              Our @profdiggity with experts from @YaleISP , @bkc and across US law and tech contributed to this amicus brief on and psafe.ly/7ShfXu

                                                                                              AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                              [?]Sean O'Brien » 🌐
                                                                                              @profdiggity@privacysafe.social

                                                                                              NEW: Our amicus brief on and 👇

                                                                                              psafe.ly/7ShfXu

                                                                                              Thanks to my colleagues at , @lessig at @bkc , and many others across and for their support & contributions.

                                                                                              Our brief warns that excluding AI generated works from copyright puts creativity and at risk. Thread 🧵

                                                                                              supreme court brief

                                                                                              Alt...supreme court brief

                                                                                              supreme court brief

                                                                                              Alt...supreme court brief

                                                                                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                  [?]Sean O'Brien » 🌐
                                                                                                  @profdiggity@privacysafe.social

                                                                                                  NEW: Our amicus brief on and 👇

                                                                                                  psafe.ly/7ShfXu

                                                                                                  Thanks to my colleagues at , @lessig at @bkc , and many others across and for their support & contributions.

                                                                                                  Our brief warns that excluding AI generated works from copyright puts creativity and at risk. Thread 🧵

                                                                                                  supreme court brief

                                                                                                  Alt...supreme court brief

                                                                                                  supreme court brief

                                                                                                  Alt...supreme court brief

                                                                                                    AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                    [?]datum (n=1) » 🌐
                                                                                                    @datum@zeroes.ca

                                                                                                    It turns out that a lot of "impossible" things are really just fights you'd rather not have.

                                                                                                    @pluralistic nails it. pluralistic.net/2025/11/28/dis

                                                                                                      1 ★ 4 ↺

                                                                                                      [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                                                                                      @abucci@buc.ci

                                                                                                      Before the automobile industry invented the catalytic converter, the costs of reducing air pollution seemed astronomical, enough to bankrupt the entire industry. After they invented the catalytical converter, the costs were manageable. And they only invented it because they were faced with the threat of being shut down.
                                                                                                      Industries creating harms often claim that controls and regulations are impossible, would bankrupt them, etc., trying to make their existence into a zero-sum game (for some people to have the benefit of our industry, other people must suffer). AI companies claim they must steal copyrighted works because they could not exist otherwise; or be allowed to use as much electricity as they demand in spite of the costs. But it's B.S., and we should stop accepting this rhetoric. Forced to innovate to reduce harms, these industries have innovated, and made themselves even more profitable than they were when they were dragging their feet about it like children who don't want to clean their rooms.

                                                                                                      From Is Climate Change An Externality


                                                                                                        AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                        [?]AA » 🌐
                                                                                                        @AAKL@infosec.exchange

                                                                                                        From yesterday. Reason #1 for disliking AI: it's based on stolen data and copyrighted IPs - still.

                                                                                                        “Somebody said: ‘Man, somebody done typed your name in the AI and made a white version of you. They just used the Blanco, not the Brown.”

                                                                                                        AP: AI country hit ‘Walk My Walk’ built on Blanco Brown’s sound sparks questions of attribution, ethics apnews.com/article/walk-my-wal @AssociatedPress

                                                                                                          AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                          [?]ResearchBuzz: Firehose » 🌐
                                                                                                          @researchbuzz_firehose@rbfirehose.com

                                                                                                          Hollywood Reporter: OpenAI Loses Key Discovery Battle as It Cedes Ground to Authors in AI Lawsuits. “In a controversial decision that was appealed by OpenAI on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Ona Wang found that OpenAI must hand over documents revealing the company’s motivations for deleting the datasets. OpenAI’s in-house legal team will be deposed. At stake: Billions of dollars and, […]

                                                                                                          https://rbfirehose.com/2025/11/30/hollywood-reporter-openai-loses-key-discovery-battle-as-it-cedes-ground-to-authors-in-ai-lawsuits/

                                                                                                          AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                          [?]Dave Rahardja » 🌐
                                                                                                          @drahardja@sfba.social

                                                                                                          Gary K Wolf, creator of Roger Rabbit, has regained control of the copyright to the Roger Rabbit character universe, through the use of the Copyright Reversion Rights, something I never knew existed in US copyright law.

                                                                                                          The Copyright Reversion Rights law says that a creator who signed away the rights to their work product is entitled to claim those rights back after 35 years, by notifying the US Copyright Office.

                                                                                                          Fascinating!

                                                                                                          cartoonbrew.com/business/gary-

                                                                                                            AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                            [?]Edwin G. :mapleleafroundel: » 🌐
                                                                                                            @EdwinG@mstdn.moimeme.ca

                                                                                                            The Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that it has jurisdiction in the copyright lawsuit against OpenAI

                                                                                                            thecanadianpressnews.ca/nation
                                                                                                            - - -
                                                                                                            La Cour supérieure de justice de l’Ontario a conclu qu’elle a jurisdiction dans la poursuite au sujet des droits d’auteur contre OpenAI

                                                                                                            // Article en anglais //

                                                                                                              AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                              [?]Steven Saus [he/him] » 🌐
                                                                                                              @StevenSaus@faithcollapsing.com

                                                                                                              uspol [SENSITIVE CONTENT]

                                                                                                              (19 Nov) He got sued for sharing public YouTube videos; nightmare ended in settlement

                                                                                                              Librarian vows to stop invasive ed tech after ending lawsuit with Proctorio.

                                                                                                              s.faithcollapsing.com/w4i7g

                                                                                                              -tech -technology -speech

                                                                                                              An image for decorative purposes automatically pulled from the post.

                                                                                                              Alt...An image for decorative purposes automatically pulled from the post.

                                                                                                                AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                                [?]Andrew (Television Executive) » 🌐
                                                                                                                @ajroach42@retro.social

                                                                                                                lmfao.

                                                                                                                Okay.

                                                                                                                So Arrow Distribution gave me a strike against the film Hero of City.

                                                                                                                Hero of City is an unlicensed remake of Reservoir Dogs.

                                                                                                                Arrow Distribution does not own Hero of City.

                                                                                                                Arrow Distribution allegedly owns the rights to City on Fire.

                                                                                                                Reservoir Dogs is a City on Fire remake (again, unlicensed.)

                                                                                                                So Arrow Distribution gave me a copyright strike on my personal youtube channel for uploading a 2001 Hong Kong remake of an American film they do not own the rights to, because that American film they do not own the rights to is a remake of an 80s Hong Kong film they *do* own the rights to.

                                                                                                                Everything is fine.

                                                                                                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                                                                                                  [?]Renatomancer » 🌐
                                                                                                                  @Renatomancer@vmst.io

                                                                                                                  1 ★ 1 ↺

                                                                                                                  [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                                                                                                  @abucci@buc.ci

                                                                                                                  Anthropic will face a class-action lawsuit from US authors
                                                                                                                  A California federal judge ruled Thursday that three authors suing Anthropic over copyright infringement can bring a class action lawsuit representing all U.S. writers whose work was allegedly downloaded from libraries of pirated works.
                                                                                                                  From https://www.theverge.com/anthropic/709183/anthropic-class-action-lawsuit-pirated-books-authors-downloads

                                                                                                                  Even though I am probably one of the affected authors, lawsuits like this make me nervous. If the decision comes down in favor of Anthropic it sets a precedent for repeating what they and others have done. I am very skeptical that these issues would be appropriately settled in the courts; we need proper regulation of this industry as of two years ago. It's likewise worth noting that OpenAI claims at least 10x the traffic of Anthropic's various products.

                                                                                                                  Also, I've been in these kinds of lawsuits before. We'll end up getting a coupon for $1 off use of Claude if the class wins, or something comparably absurd. (*)

                                                                                                                  (*) Years ago I was inadvertently part of a class action lawsuit against Poland Spring because I bought their water during the period covered by the lawsuit. They were found guilty of deceptive marketing because they were mixing tap water in with the "spring water" they claimed to be selling. I was awarded a $1, maybe $5, coupon to buy Poland "Spring" water.