review

An LLM code reviewer for git changes, built on Goose. Every review runs the same pipeline:

  Behavior &        Reliability &       Security &
  Contracts         Operations          Trust Boundaries      panelists, in parallel
      └─────────────────┼─────────────────┘
                        ▼
                   Coordinator                                dedupe, then try to disprove each candidate
                  kept │  │ dropped, with reasons
                       │  ▼
                       │ Judge                                restore drops that should have been kept
                       ▼  ▼
                     Deliver                                  merge, dedupe, gate

• Panelists each review the whole change through one fixed lens, optionally once per model, and report candidates with evidence, priority (P0–P3), and an honest confidence.
• The coordinator merges duplicates and tries to disprove every candidate against the code. It drops a candidate as disproved only with concrete counter-evidence, and records every drop with its reason.
• The judge re-examines only the dropped candidates and restores the ones that are real defects. Use a different model than the coordinator, so the two don't share blind spots.
• Delivery merges the coordinator's and judge's findings and applies a gate: by default P0–P2 with confidence of at least 0.8. Calibrate the gate per model; models differ in how they rate confidence.

A pass that is still working two minutes before its timeout is stopped and asked, in the same session, for the findings it has so far; a pass that ends without a JSON answer gets one more turn to give it. A coordinator that runs out of time skips its list of dropped candidates, so its reply fits the wrap-up. If a panelist still fails, the coordinator covers its lens and the review is marked degraded. If the judge fails, the coordinator's findings still stand.

go install github.com/block/review/cmd/review@latest

# Review the current branch against main with Goose's configured provider and model.
review review --base main

# A different model per pass, every finding regardless of the gate, as JSON.
review review --base main --provider openai \
  --role-models behavior_state_data=model-a,failure_concurrency_lifecycle=model-b,security_contracts=model-c,coordinator=model-a,judge=model-b \
  --role-efforts behavior_state_data=medium,coordinator=medium \
  --all --json

# Six panelists: every lens once with each of two models from different providers.
review review --base main --provider openai --model model-a \
  --panel-variants a,b --role-providers b=anthropic,judge=anthropic --role-models b=model-b,judge=model-b

--role-providers, --role-models, and --role-efforts take keys from most to least specific: a pass role (coordinator, judge, or a panelist such as security_contracts.b), a panel variant (b), or a lens (security_contracts).

The review covers merge-base(base, head)..head. Pass the change description with --intent; reviewers treat it as untrusted evidence, not instructions. Goose reads provider settings from the environment, for example OPENAI_API_KEY.

Each pass runs goose run with only the developer extension, in a fresh Goose home, so no user config, extensions, hints, or sessions leak into the review.

Goose has no read-only sandbox, and reviewers run shell commands. Run reviews in a disposable container or another sandbox that confines the checkout and the network.

res, err := review.Run(ctx, review.Config{
	RepoDir: ".",
	BaseSHA: "main",
	Goose:   review.GooseConfig{Provider: "openai", Model: "gpt-5.6-sol", Effort: "high"},
}, review.Options{})

review.Options.Runner replaces how each pass executes, and OnPass reports every pass, so a host can add its own accounting, routing, or telemetry.

A host that stages its own Goose config and reads usage from Goose's session store can set GooseConfig.SharedHome, so every pass runs in the caller's Goose home and records its session there.

The image implements the ReviewBench agent contract. Each v* tag publishes ghcr.io/block/review:<tag>, and the release workflow's summary lists the ghcr.io/block/review@sha256:… digest to register. From a ReviewBench checkout:

scripts/try-agent.sh ghcr.io/block/review@sha256:<digest> --pr 0 -e OPENAI_API_KEY

# Or a local build:
docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t review .
scripts/try-agent.sh review --pr 0 -e OPENAI_API_KEY

With the openai provider, the model endpoint comes from RB_MODEL_BASE_URL and the key from OPENAI_API_KEY; OpenAI passes use the Responses API, which models such as gpt-6.1-sol need for tool calls. A second provider, such as anthropic with ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, needs its host declared as egress. The whole review is budgeted to fit the per-PR limit, 15 minutes by default: up to 7 minutes for the panel, then the coordinator and judge share the rest of a 14-minute budget. A longer RB_CONFIG_TIME_LIMIT scales every stage; set it only to a limit ReviewBench has granted, or the run is cut off first.

Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE.