Skip to content

ci: report-only smoke-test-coverage check (inbox#20/#21) - #398

Merged
bryan-minimal merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/smoke-test-coverage
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

ci: report-only smoke-test-coverage check (inbox#20/#21)#398
bryan-minimal merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/smoke-test-coverage

Conversation

@bryan-minimal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

An inbox#20 entry-to-main criterion: each package should carry ≥1 Standalone buildspec test that meaningfully exercises it (distinct from the upstream project's own make test). This is the third report-only promotion signal — after #279 (upstream version-age) and #280 (stable closure), alongside the new dwell check (#397) — and the biggest Phase-1 gate that was entirely unbuilt.

What

smoke_test_report.py detects a Standalone test per package — either the standaloneTest "..." helper or an explicit class = 'Standalone — by scanning tracked build.ncl. Pure text: no minimal dump, no network, no secrets.

smoke-test-coverage.yml runs it on pull_request → main (changed packages — the entry gate) and workflow_dispatch (full-catalog coverage dashboard). Hardened exactly like version-age.yml (pinned action SHA, contents: read, report-only) and must not be a required check.

Current coverage (full catalog)

119 / 390 covered (30%) · 271 missing

So ~271 packages have no Standalone test today — the report names them with a copy-paste snippet to add one.

Notes

  • Presence only — whether a test meaningfully exercises the package is a human call the check can't make.
  • Report-only: never blocks, intentionally excluded from required checks. Wire to required only after the coverage gap is worked down (inbox#20 "spec-first" strategy).

Building block for gominimal/inbox#20 (smoke-test criterion) · gominimal/inbox#21.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

inbox#20 entry-to-main criterion: each package should carry >=1 Standalone
buildspec test that meaningfully exercises it (distinct from upstream's own
tests). This reports coverage; it's the third report-only promotion signal
after #279 (version-age) and #280 (closure), alongside the dwell check.

smoke_test_report.py detects a Standalone test per package (the
`standaloneTest "..."` helper or an explicit `class = 'Standalone`) by scanning
tracked build.ncl -- no dump, no network, no secrets. Runs on pull_request into
main (changed packages) and workflow_dispatch (full-catalog coverage
dashboard). Hardened like version-age.yml (pinned SHA, contents:read,
report-only) and MUST NOT be a required check.

Current catalog coverage: 119/390 (30%).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 47 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9857b008-e40e-407e-b2b4-b2c989ce7a83

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd4b09d and 43ac134.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/scripts/smoke_test_report.py
  • .github/workflows/smoke-test-coverage.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/smoke-test-coverage

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@bryan-minimal
bryan-minimal added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 14, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 96ac3f1 Jul 14, 2026
7 checks passed
@bryan-minimal
bryan-minimal deleted the feat/smoke-test-coverage branch July 14, 2026 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants