Skip to content

Fix possible signed integer overflow in ijToIjk#733

Closed
isaacbrodsky wants to merge 3 commits into
uber:masterfrom
isaacbrodsky:fix-ijtoijk-signed-integer-overflow
Closed

Fix possible signed integer overflow in ijToIjk#733
isaacbrodsky wants to merge 3 commits into
uber:masterfrom
isaacbrodsky:fix-ijtoijk-signed-integer-overflow

Conversation

@isaacbrodsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Follow up to #706.

@coveralls

coveralls commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.001%) to 98.642% when pulling 1309956 on isaacbrodsky:fix-ijtoijk-signed-integer-overflow into 975de7a on uber:master.

@isaacbrodsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

CI seems to be failing due presumably unrelated error about E: Unable to locate package clang-format-9

@isaacbrodsky
isaacbrodsky force-pushed the fix-ijtoijk-signed-integer-overflow branch from 2c018ce to 1309956 Compare December 7, 2022 04:37
@isaacbrodsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

The fuzzer failure looks like an unrelated flaky fuzzer on polygonToCells

@isaacbrodsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of using macros in #735.

@isaacbrodsky
isaacbrodsky deleted the fix-ijtoijk-signed-integer-overflow branch December 11, 2022 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants