Skip to content

[css-display] Missing definition of 'inline-list-item' #1495

Closed

Description

@Loirooriol

The Precomposed Inline-level Display Values section defines the following <display-legacy> keywords:

  • inline-block: Behaves as inline flow-root.
  • inline-table: Behaves as inline table.
  • inline-flex: Behaves as inline flex.
  • inline-grid: Behaves as inline grid.

However, <display-legacy> allows a 5th possibility: inline-list-item.

According to the summary table, it should be

  • inline-list-item: Behaves as list-item inline flow.

Or, to maintain a similarity among all these definitions, the equivalent

  • inline-list-item: Behaves as inline list-item.

Activity

  1. Loirooriol commented on Jun 4, 2017

    @Loirooriol
    ContributorAuthor

    Or maybe inline-list-item should be dropped. All the other precomposed inline-level values are inline- followed by an inner display type, and exist for legacy reasons. But list-item is not an inner display type, and is a new addition.

  2. tabatkins commented on Jun 5, 2017

    @tabatkins
    Member

    I don't think anyone has implemented inline-list-item yet - it's just specified over in Lists, as a useful feature. If so, we should just drop it, and let people write inline list-item if they want.

  3. css-meeting-bot commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @css-meeting-bot
    Member

    The CSS Working Group just discussed Publishing an updated WD of css-align and css-display, and agreed to the following resolutions:

    • RESOLVED: Publish an updated WD of css-align
    The full IRC log of that discussion <dael> Topic: Publishing an updated WD of css-align and css-display
    <Rossen_> t- ?? wow :)
    <dael> astearns: align it's an updated WD
    <dael> fantasai: Yep. We wanted dbaron approval on that since a lot of the issues were filed by him. If he's okay publishing now or wants more time to look.
    <dael> dbaron: I think there's more work to do, but I wouldn't obj to a new WD. I went through the commentor response required, well, all but 3. THere were 4 I marked as not satisfied.
    <dael> fantasai: Great. publish an update and keep working
    <ChrisL> that is an auto-publish, right?
    <dael> astearns: Obj to updated WD of css align?
    <fantasai> ChrisL, yes
    <dael> RESOLVED: Publish an updated WD of css-align
    <dael> astearns: Second is also updated WD of css-display. Looked like fewer issues.
    <dael> fantasai: Fewer, but quite a few. We could do 1495 quickly before publish. We should do an update and then keep working.
    <fantasai> https://github.com//issues/1495
    <dael> github: https://github.com//issues/1495
    <fantasai> GitHub: https://github.com//issues/1495
  4. astearns commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @astearns
    Member

    we confused the bot - the actual minutes on this issue are

    fantasai: Suggestion was it's a little different then some of the others and do we really need this one. It might be worth dropping that unless someone has impl and wants to keep it.
    astearns: Anyone know if inline-list-item has been imp?
    Rossen_: I don't believe we are.
    astearns: Obj to dropping inline-list-item?
    fantasai: No hits in Mozilla's codebase
    RESOLVED: Drop inline-list-item

  5. FremyCompany commented on Jul 19, 2017

    @FremyCompany
    Contributor

    We need to be kinder with the bot, or it might try to drown itself ;-)

    image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions