You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[css-display] Missing definition of 'inline-list-item' #1495
Or maybe inline-list-item should be dropped. All the other precomposed inline-level values are inline- followed by an inner display type, and exist for legacy reasons. But list-item is not an inner display type, and is a new addition.
I don't think anyone has implemented inline-list-item yet - it's just specified over in Lists, as a useful feature. If so, we should just drop it, and let people write inline list-item if they want.
The CSS Working Group just discussed Publishing an updated WD of css-align and css-display, and agreed to the following resolutions:
RESOLVED: Publish an updated WD of css-align
The full IRC log of that discussion
<dael> Topic: Publishing an updated WD of css-align and css-display
<Rossen_> t- ?? wow :)
<dael> astearns: align it's an updated WD
<dael> fantasai: Yep. We wanted dbaron approval on that since a lot of the issues were filed by him. If he's okay publishing now or wants more time to look.
<dael> dbaron: I think there's more work to do, but I wouldn't obj to a new WD. I went through the commentor response required, well, all but 3. THere were 4 I marked as not satisfied.
<dael> fantasai: Great. publish an update and keep working
<ChrisL> that is an auto-publish, right?
<dael> astearns: Obj to updated WD of css align?
<fantasai> ChrisL, yes
<dael> RESOLVED: Publish an updated WD of css-align
<dael> astearns: Second is also updated WD of css-display. Looked like fewer issues.
<dael> fantasai: Fewer, but quite a few. We could do 1495 quickly before publish. We should do an update and then keep working.
<fantasai> https://github.com//issues/1495
<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/1495
<fantasai> GitHub: https://github.com//issues/1495
we confused the bot - the actual minutes on this issue are
fantasai: Suggestion was it's a little different then some of the others and do we really need this one. It might be worth dropping that unless someone has impl and wants to keep it.
astearns: Anyone know if inline-list-item has been imp?
Rossen_: I don't believe we are.
astearns: Obj to dropping inline-list-item?
fantasai: No hits in Mozilla's codebase
RESOLVED: Drop inline-list-item
Activity
Loirooriol commentedon Jun 4, 2017
Or maybe
inline-list-itemshould be dropped. All the other precomposed inline-level values areinline-followed by an inner display type, and exist for legacy reasons. Butlist-itemis not an inner display type, and is a new addition.tabatkins commentedon Jun 5, 2017
I don't think anyone has implemented
inline-list-itemyet - it's just specified over in Lists, as a useful feature. If so, we should just drop it, and let people writeinline list-itemif they want.css-meeting-bot commentedon Jul 19, 2017
The CSS Working Group just discussed
Publishing an updated WD of css-align and css-display, and agreed to the following resolutions:RESOLVED: Publish an updated WD of css-alignThe full IRC log of that discussion
<dael> Topic: Publishing an updated WD of css-align and css-display<Rossen_> t- ?? wow :)
<dael> astearns: align it's an updated WD
<dael> fantasai: Yep. We wanted dbaron approval on that since a lot of the issues were filed by him. If he's okay publishing now or wants more time to look.
<dael> dbaron: I think there's more work to do, but I wouldn't obj to a new WD. I went through the commentor response required, well, all but 3. THere were 4 I marked as not satisfied.
<dael> fantasai: Great. publish an update and keep working
<ChrisL> that is an auto-publish, right?
<dael> astearns: Obj to updated WD of css align?
<fantasai> ChrisL, yes
<dael> RESOLVED: Publish an updated WD of css-align
<dael> astearns: Second is also updated WD of css-display. Looked like fewer issues.
<dael> fantasai: Fewer, but quite a few. We could do 1495 quickly before publish. We should do an update and then keep working.
<fantasai> https://github.com//issues/1495
<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/1495
<fantasai> GitHub: https://github.com//issues/1495
astearns commentedon Jul 19, 2017
we confused the bot - the actual minutes on this issue are
fantasai: Suggestion was it's a little different then some of the others and do we really need this one. It might be worth dropping that unless someone has impl and wants to keep it.
astearns: Anyone know if inline-list-item has been imp?
Rossen_: I don't believe we are.
astearns: Obj to dropping inline-list-item?
fantasai: No hits in Mozilla's codebase
RESOLVED: Drop inline-list-item
FremyCompany commentedon Jul 19, 2017
We need to be kinder with the bot, or it might try to drown itself ;-)