Machine account authentications performance #8352

Activity

1. hifabienne

   added

   performancePerformance investigation or improvementPerformance investigation or improvement

   on Jul 23, 2024
2. hifabienne

   added this to Product Managementon Jul 23, 2024
3. hifabienne

   assigned

   adlerhurst

   on Jul 23, 2024
4. hifabienne

   moved this to 📋 Sprint Backlog in Product Managementon Aug 2, 2024
5. adlerhurst

   added a commit that references this issue on Aug 27, 2024

   test(load): machine jwt profile grant (#8482)

   ...

   1ce9a43
6. muhlemmer

   added a commit that references this issue on Sep 11, 2024

   perf(oidc): remove get user by ID from jwt profile grant (#8580)

   ...

   58a7eb1
7. muhlemmer

   self-assigned this

   on Oct 9, 2024
8. muhlemmer commented on Oct 9, 2024

   

   muhlemmer

   on Oct 9, 2024

   Collaborator

   More actions

   I am able to authenticate 1000 machine users per second (using JTW Profile grant)

   Can we clarify this a little bit? I'm confused by the current loadtest definition which does JWT profile grant and then a userinfo call with the resulting token. The additional request does take extra time and resources. However, by reading the definition of this line, we shouldn't do that step, right? What is your opinion @fforootd, @adlerhurst?
9. fforootd commented on Oct 9, 2024

   

   fforootd

   on Oct 9, 2024

   Last edited by fforootd

   Member

   More actions

   I think we should keep it lean, so I would test 1000/rps just for the tokens.

   We can introduce a separate test for userinfo later on.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Daniel Loader
10. adlerhurst

    added

    area/storageDatabase, eventstore, projections, migrationsDatabase, eventstore, projections, migrations

    on Nov 11, 2024
11. adlerhurst

    added a commit that references this issue on Nov 15, 2024

    docs: init benchmarks (#8894)

    ...

    fbebe0f
12. muhlemmer

    moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Product Managementon Jan 6, 2025
13. muhlemmer

    closed this as completedin #9092on Jan 8, 2025
14. muhlemmer

    added a commit that references this issue on Jan 8, 2025

    perf(eventstore): optimize commands to events function (#9092)

    ...

    df2c6f1
15. github-project-automation

    moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Product Managementon Jan 8, 2025
16. stebenz

    added a commit that references this issue on Jan 13, 2025

    perf(eventstore): optimize commands to events function (#9092)

    ...

    12cd61c
17. adlerhurst

    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jan 13, 2025

    perf(eventstore): optimize commands to events function (#9092)

    ...

    037384d

    refactor: consolidate database pools (#9105)

    ...

    4645045
18. fo-ofc

    added a commit that references this issue on Jun 10, 2026

    perf(eventstore): optimize commands to events function (zitadel#9092)

    ...

    5d324a5
19. muhlemmer

    added a commit that references this issue on Sep 1, 2026

    docs(perf): v4.17.1 results and harness fixes (#12651)

    ...

    3be21cc
20. livio-a

    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Sep 4, 2026

    docs(perf): v4.17.1 results and harness fixes (#12651)

    ...

    d5d9854

    docs(perf): v4.17.1 results and harness fixes (#12651)

    ...

    a7b3f69