Not
everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, we recommend "something old" that is still well worth
reading. "Something Old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique
classic to a good book first published four or more years ago.
GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ: A LIFE by Gerald
Martin (first published 2008)
Twice before on
this blog I have waxed eloquent about the difficulties involved in writing
biographies. (Look up the posts WhyWrite a New Biography? and The Toilof Biography). My most consistent theme has been that, once a good
biography of somebody has been published, it is pointless to write a new
biography unless important new material has come to light or unless the new
biographer has a radically different interpretation of the life under review.
Another issue I should have dealt with was the question of how close the
biographer is to the person being examined. This is a special problem when we
come to the biographies of the still-living or the only-recently-dead. The
biographer may be a friend, colleague or frequent companion of the person being
written about. Immediately we have the problem of “objectivity”. How much can
we trust the word of somebody who may have the inside goss, but who doesn’t
have the distance to deal with it rationally?
I think a good (or
bad) example of this is Gerald Martin’s Gabriel
Garcia Marquez: A Life. I have already told (see the posts on The General in His Labyrinth and Autumn of the Patriarch) the story of
how the Sunday Star-Times
commissioned me, seven years ago, to review this huge volume. I accepted, and I
then went into a crash programme, over about seven weeks, of reading all Garcia
Marquez’s major novels and some of his reportage. This was because I hadn’t
hitherto read his works. When I read Gerald Martin’s book I found it fascinating,
but was troubled by the lack of distance between author and subject.
Anyway here,
unaltered from its original appearance, is the review I wrote for the Sunday Star-Times (1 March 2009).
* *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
How prudent is
it to write a man’s life when that man is still alive? And how much is a
biographer compromised if he is also a friend of his subject?
These two
questions began buzzing through my mind almost as soon as I started reading the
nearly 600 large pages of this blockbuster.
That Gabriel
Garcia Marquez’s life is worth telling there can be no doubt. Now in his 80s,
the Colombian novelist is one of the world’s few genuine literary superstars. When
he won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1982, it was a rare occasion in the
history of that contentious award, because the win was universally applauded.
Although I’d personally beg to differ (I’m not the greatest Garcia Marquez fan),
many have cited his One Hundred Years of
Solitude as the most influential Spanish-language novel since Don Quixote. Rare for a Nobel laureate,
his huge international readership consistently makes him a bestseller. In Latin
America, he’s famous enough to be universally recognised by his nickname “Gabo”.
His political pronouncements, hobnobbing with the great and the famous, and
deliberate clowning for the press are as well known in that part of the world
as his novels and stories.
A former
journalist himself, Garcia Marquez is always good for a headline and treats
journalists with the type of deadpan wit I’d associate with Alfred Hitchcock’s
press conferences. He once impishly told an audience that he preferred to read
his own novels in their English translations. Later he claimed that his wife
Mercedes really wrote all his books, but thought they were so bad that she let
him sign his name to them. Apparently some listeners were dozy enough to
believe him for a while.
But here’s the
rub. Gabriel Garcia Marquez is still alive, and much that is most intimate
about him cannot and will not be told until he’s safely dead. Think of all
those inaccessible files of letters by enemies, friends and former friends,
like the great Peruvian novelist Mario Vargas Llosa. Mario used to be Garcia
Marquez’s best buddy, but ended up thumping him in the nose when he thought
Garcia Marquez had been fooling around with his wife. The two men didn’t speak
for 30 years. The biography of a living person will always be a provisional
record at best.
Gerald Martin
has been actively researching his subject for 18 years. He has been admitted
into the Garcia Marquez family circle, where he is known as the gringo “Yeral”.
He has interviewed nearly every living person who has known Garcia Marquez,
from Fidel Castro to obscure drinking mates from his apprentice years. He
regularly socialises with Garcia Marquez’s friends. His documentation is both
scrupulous and copious. Martin aspires to be Gabo’s Boswell, recording all the
things the great man has said or done. In a preface he disconcertingly tells us
that this very large book is only a smaller version of a work that will
eventually run to more than 2500 pages. Presumably this will be published when
Garcia Marquez is in his grave.
Martin is a
respected academic, and does offer fruitful insights into the genesis of the
novelist’s works. They range from the straight social protest of In an Evil Hour to the modernist
experimentalism of The Autumn of the
Patriarch (in my view Garcia Marquez’s best book) to the severe historical
reconstruction of the Simon Bolivar novel The
General in his Labyrinth. The great turning point was, of course, One Hundred Years of Solitude, and
Martin smartly reminds us that although its “magical realism” is the best-known
thing about it, “magical realism” was a short-lived phenomenon both in the
novelist’s oeuvre, and in Latin American literature as a whole.
When he chooses
to play Freud, Martin also offers worthwhile analysis of Gabo’s life. Deserted by a feckless father, and with a
mother who had a large family to raise, the novelist as a boy bonded most
closely with his crotchety old soldier of a grandfather, who was his role model
perhaps in more ways than Garcia Marquez ever realised.
So far, so
enlightening. But then there are those cringe-worthy moments when Gerald Martin
introduces himself into the narrative in the first-person, and tells us about
the gatherings of glitterati, honouring Garcia Marquez, that he has attended.
The book ends with a “Bradford’s Hollywood” account of Gabo’s 80th
birthday party. It leaves me with the heretical thought that if Bill Clinton
and Oprah Winfrey both gush over a writer, then there really must be something
seriously questionable about him.
What is being
played out in this book, and in Martin himself, is the conflict between the fan
and the scholar, the buddy and the sober biographer. There are time when Martin
seems to wilfully soft-pedal his hero’s faults. The worst is his long account
of Garcia Marquez’s long pre-marital affair, in the 1950s, with a young woman
whom he then abandoned and yet who later became a sort of unofficial mistress.
Clearly, Martin hasn’t been able to get all the facts of the case (again the
problem of writing about living people). But reading between the lines, the young
novelist seems to have been more of a swine than Martin wants to admit.
Most
interestingly, Martin’s own patience begins to wear a little thin late in this
narrative. In the last 100 pages, he does actually question some of Gabo’s
political statements. The Latin American’s resentment of interference by the
United States is fully understandable, especially in the light of the
horrendous recent history of Colombia, which Martin gives us in detail. But
Gabo’s dogged defence of Fidel Castro has led him to make some decidedly dodgy
judgements of his own.
Martin also gets
to criticise the macho sexual element in Garcia Marquez’s work, especially in
the overrated Love in the Time of Cholera
and in the silly old goat’s fantasy Memories
of my Melancholy Whores.
Frankly, Garcia
Marquez’s inability to differentiate love from sexual fantasising is what most
repels me from some of his work, and I sense that Martin unwillingly comes to
the same conclusion.
Let’s be fair
about this, though.
The tone is
uneven, the evasions stick out like a sore thumb and the fandom parts are
obnoxious. But there is enough solid scholarship in this biography to make it
indispensible to interpreters of Garcia Marquez. And the entertaining anecdotes
make it a page-turner, despite its formidable length.
It’s the first
draft of an important life.
* *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* *
Up-Date Footnote:
Obviously the above review was written five years before Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s
death (in April 2014). Though Gerald Martin (an expert on South American
literature, who has written books about other authors including Vargas Llosa)
has produced The Cambridge Introduction
to Gabriel Garcia Marquez (2012) he has not yet produced the 2500 page work
he promised in his 600-page biography of Gabo. Perhaps it is still in progress.