Teacher Evaluation Report
Teacher Name:
Grade/Class:
Subject(s) Taught:
Evaluation Period:
Section A: Teaching Effectiveness
Criteria Weight (%) Score (1-10) Evidence/
Comments
Subject 15%
Knowledge
Lesson Planning 15%
& Delivery
Innovation in 10%
Teaching
Student 15%
Engagement
Learning 20%
Outcomes
Feedback & 10%
Assessment
Subtotal 85%
(Teaching
Effectiveness)
Section B: Professionalism & Collaboration
Criteria Weight (%) Score (1-10) Evidence/
Comments
Punctuality & 10%
Reliability
Collaboration 10%
with Colleagues
Professional 10%
Development
Parental 5%
Communication
Subtotal 15%
(Professionalism)
Section C: Classroom Environment
Criteria Weight (%) Score (1-10) Evidence/
Comments
Classroom 10%
Management
Motivational 10%
Strategies
Support for 10%
Struggling
Students
Behavioral 10%
Guidance
Subtotal 40%
(Classroom
Environment)
Section D: Use of Technology & Innovation
Criteria Weight (%) Score (1-10) Evidence/
Comments
Integration of 10%
Technology
Creative 10%
Resource
Utilization
Subtotal 20%
(Technology &
Innovation)
Final Assessment
Criteria Weight (%) Total Score Comments/
Action Plan
Overall 100% Key areas of
Performance strength and
specific areas
needing
improvement.
Rating Scale:
9–10: Exceptional - Outstanding performance; consider for leadership or
mentoring roles.
7–8: Good - Solid performance; encourage continued professional
development.
5–6: Average - Meets basic expectations; focus on identified improvement
areas.
3–4: Needs Improvement - Below expectations; requires targeted coaching
and support.
1–2: Unsatisfactory - Significant gaps; consider performance improvement
plans or alternative role alignment.
Feedback Sections
1. Strengths: Highlight areas where the teacher excels (e.g., creativity,
subject knowledge)
2. Areas for Improvement: Clearly identify specific behaviors, actions, or
skills that need enhancement.
3. Action Plan for Growth: Recommend short-term (e.g., training sessions)
and long-term (e.g., leadership opportunities) development initiatives.
4. Evaluator’s Comments: Provide personalized, constructive feedback.
Evaluator’s Signature:
Date: __________