Progressive critics of the conservative right have always found solid ground by calling out the hypocrisy of free-market zealots who nonetheless tolerate government subsidies for big campaign contributors like Big Sugar.
It is a peculiar characteristic of GOP voters that they support free market principles with religious ferocity yet elect politicians who prop up crony capitalism in its worst form: government subsidies for agricultural producers like Florida's sugar industry that raise consumer costs for food across the board.
For a very long time, Florida Republicans and Democrats have taken their cue from Big Sugar and campaign cash liberally sprinkled in their direction by the Fanjul billionaires and other Big Sugar players. Irrespective of which party controls Congress, the sugar subsidy has been sacrosanct. According to a recent report in the Washington Post, that may no longer be true.
Big Sugar built its impregnable political fortress and wealth by allying its price support with farm policy benefits afforded to corn farmers in the midwest. In doing so, Florida sugar growers benefited from a block in the House and Senate that could not be budged; neither by the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, nor by the Competitive Enterprise Institute nor even the ultra conservative Club for Growth.
The Post suggests that eliminating the hypocrisy embedded in GOP support for corporate welfare is now a high priority for powerful conservatives and political operatives.
Big Sugar is a key player in the shadow government that has turned both the GOP and Democrats into pawns for an industry that poisons people, through sugar's massive impacts on public health, poisons democracy, through sugar's phantom operations on elections, and poisons the Everglades.
On the Big Sugar front, Florida environmentalists welcome Grover Norquist and the Club for Growth: "Enough is Enough!" One would think this a story big enough to warrant just the smallest nod by the Miami Herald, by WLRN and WPBT, and television news in Florida.
Exclusive: Corn refiners declare war on sugar, conservative groups jump onboard
WASHINGTON POST
By Tom Hamburger and James Hohmann June 24 at 6:00 AM
For decades, it’s been an unspoken rule among Washington’s agricultural lobbyists: advocates for one crop do not attack other crops, so that everyone’s benefits can be protected.
But a leading member of the traditionally united community plans to do just that: the Corn Refiners Association is about to invest heavily in an effort to unwind the lucrative breaks afforded to sugar, which are among the most generous in U.S. agriculture.
The Corn Refiners, representing companies that produce high-fructose corn syrup, just hired 10 outside lobbyists for an aggressive, unorthodox attack on the federal sugar program just a year after a new farm bill was signed into law. Their first target is the agriculture appropriations bill, now moving through a House committee.
It is a peculiar characteristic of GOP voters that they support free market principles with religious ferocity yet elect politicians who prop up crony capitalism in its worst form: government subsidies for agricultural producers like Florida's sugar industry that raise consumer costs for food across the board.
For a very long time, Florida Republicans and Democrats have taken their cue from Big Sugar and campaign cash liberally sprinkled in their direction by the Fanjul billionaires and other Big Sugar players. Irrespective of which party controls Congress, the sugar subsidy has been sacrosanct. According to a recent report in the Washington Post, that may no longer be true.
Big Sugar built its impregnable political fortress and wealth by allying its price support with farm policy benefits afforded to corn farmers in the midwest. In doing so, Florida sugar growers benefited from a block in the House and Senate that could not be budged; neither by the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, nor by the Competitive Enterprise Institute nor even the ultra conservative Club for Growth.
While other crop subsidies have withered, Washington’s taste for sugar has been constant. The sugar program, which has existed in various forms since the 1930s, uses an elaborate system of import quotas, price floors and taxpayer-backed loans to prop up domestic growers, which number fewer than 4,500.
Sugar’s protected status is largely explained by the sophistication and clout of a small but wealthy interest group that includes beet farmers in the Upper Midwest, cane growers in the South and the politically connected Fanjul family of Florida, who control a substantial part of the world sugar market. That mix of factors has led to an eclectic coalition on sugar’s side, from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).
The Post suggests that eliminating the hypocrisy embedded in GOP support for corporate welfare is now a high priority for powerful conservatives and political operatives.
“Defeating the sugar lobby is the next campaign after Ex-Im,” Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform said late Tuesday night. “Both are cronyism in its undiluted, inexcusable majesty. Both have survived because they perfected the skills to control Congress for their own profit. If they go down, no political subsidy will be safe. The implication of these wins is bigger than the ban on earmarks.”It is not the first time that prominent conservatives have publicly railed against the sugar subsidy, but if midwestern corn growers are joining the fight to de-couple from other sugar growers -- to break up the Big Sugar cartel's privileges in federal farm policy -- that would be a novel turn of events.
Big Sugar is a key player in the shadow government that has turned both the GOP and Democrats into pawns for an industry that poisons people, through sugar's massive impacts on public health, poisons democracy, through sugar's phantom operations on elections, and poisons the Everglades.
On the Big Sugar front, Florida environmentalists welcome Grover Norquist and the Club for Growth: "Enough is Enough!" One would think this a story big enough to warrant just the smallest nod by the Miami Herald, by WLRN and WPBT, and television news in Florida.
Exclusive: Corn refiners declare war on sugar, conservative groups jump onboard
WASHINGTON POST
By Tom Hamburger and James Hohmann June 24 at 6:00 AM
For decades, it’s been an unspoken rule among Washington’s agricultural lobbyists: advocates for one crop do not attack other crops, so that everyone’s benefits can be protected.
But a leading member of the traditionally united community plans to do just that: the Corn Refiners Association is about to invest heavily in an effort to unwind the lucrative breaks afforded to sugar, which are among the most generous in U.S. agriculture.
The Corn Refiners, representing companies that produce high-fructose corn syrup, just hired 10 outside lobbyists for an aggressive, unorthodox attack on the federal sugar program just a year after a new farm bill was signed into law. Their first target is the agriculture appropriations bill, now moving through a House committee.