First of all,
Film Studies For Free wanted to toot on its own trumpet today.
On Friday, its author will present at an event exploring the rapidly increasing take up in scholarly and online film studies of the distinct research methods of the
digital humanities.
In the lecture that will open the event, she will explore whether and, if so, how these contexts and methods with their digital, multimedia tools and techniques (such as online film and film culture archiving, mining and metrics, digital video essays, digital publishing and networking) may be enabling productive moves away from the existing paradigms of purely text-based, or 'traditional' offline research, scholarship and pedagogy. The focus in the main workshop part of the event will be on the film studies video essay form, that is, on the practice of using film as the medium of its own study and criticism.
A written version of the talk will be published online later this year as part of a wide ranging edited collection, with contributions by world-leading scholars and critics, on related aspects of the same important topics. This collection, commissioned, assembled and guest-edited by
FSFF's supremo, will form the inaugural issue of a brand new, Open Access journal hosted by a certain Film Studies department in one of the UK's oldest and most revered universities.
FSFF will bring you more precise, less teasing, news of this in due course....
But, staying with the digital theme, today's
FSFF post also brings you rather more immediately phenomenal news of and links to
David Bordwell's recent and hugely important online
series of studies of the transition to digital cinematic projection at his and Kristin Thompson's peerless film studies website
Observations on Film Art.
Not only are these unmissable discussions in their own right but they make themselves even more indispensable by linking to numerous further essential resources on these questions.
Below the list of links to these entries, for your convenience,
FSFF has re-embedded the great videoed discussion of digital conversion issues in the film distribution and exhibition contexts at the
Vancouver International Film Festival to which Bordwell and other luminaries contribute brilliantly.
- Pandora’s digital box: In the multiplex December 1, 2011
- Pandora’s digital box: The last 35 picture show December 15, 2011
- Pandora’s digital box: At the festival January 5, 2012
- Pandora’s digital box: From the periphery to the center, or the one of many centers January 11, 2012
- Pandora’s digital box: Art house, smart house January 30, 2012
- Pandora’s digital box: Pix and pixels February 13, 2012
- Pandora’s digital box: Notes on NOCs [Network Operations Centers] February 16, 2012
- Pandora's digital box:from Films to Files February 28, 2012
Future of Cinema - Looking Forward After 30 Years
Event description:
The first few chapter headings in a film we did not program at this year's [Vancouver International Film Festival] VIFF
are: “Technology Is Great”, “The Industry Is Dead”, “Artists Have the
Power”, and “The Craft Is Gone.” To which celluloid-loving film festival
organizers might ask: Is it? Do they? Where on earth are we headed? And why?
VIFF has come a long way in its 30 years and never has the future of cinema--and VIFF's
future--been more uncertain. Will it be bright and splendid and fair or
will it move so quickly that a great deal of what is valuable will be
lost before we know it? There are now dramatically more “film festivals”
and “films” being made than ever, yet some fear that the industry may
be dead. Filmmakers are acutely worried for funding, yet need to operate
on a growing number of fronts. Given that the numbers of hours in a day
and the numbers of days in a life remain fixed, what limits should we
council for our own appetites? Why might we miss the Hollywood Theatre
and Videomatica? Given that cultural agencies seemingly have shrinking
resources but more new media and film festival applicants every year,
will the centres hold or is babble ascendant? Will VIFF's function as an annual international universalist festival be superseded by myriad niche events?
Technology is indeed great in that it has put the means of creative
motion picture production in almost everyone's hands, but will the best
artists be the ones to be recognized? The entrepreneurial spirit tends
to favour change in hopes that it may profit from it, but will artists
have the power? When entrepreneurs benefit, will consumers benefit? Will
cultural institutions that have taken years to build remain viable?
Will cinema, metrics of quality and craftsmanship and, ultimately,
quality of life be improved or even be sustainable? What do you
personally care about for the future of cinema to offer? What should
VIFF 2020 aim to be?
Here to wrestle with these sorts of questions—and yours—will be a
distinguished group of panellists including: David Bordwell, film
critic, academic and author of numerous books on cinema; Simon Field,
film producer and former Director, International Film Festival
Rotterdam; Andréa Picard, film critic and programmer, formerly of the
Toronto International Film Festival and the Cinémathèque Ontario; Tom
Charity, film critic and Vancity Theatre program coordinator; and Alan
Franey, director, Vancouver International Film Festival.