Showing posts with label Comedy/Satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comedy/Satire. Show all posts

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Dark Dungeons (2014)






Directed by: L. Gabriel Gonda
Run Time: 40 minutes

A disclaimer before the review. I backed the Kickstarter for this movie. Please keep this in mind while reading my review. With that out of the way let's move on to how the 80's satanic panic lead to the creation of this movie.

In 1983, Patricia Pulling founded Bothered About Dungeon & Dragons (B.A.D.D.) after her son tragically committed suicide a year earlier. She claimed that Dungeons & Dragons was the gateway game to the occult and Satan. A message that resinated with Jack Chick and his ministry. They make cartoon tracts that are meant to be left in random places in the hopes of saving people from evil and hell fire. These tracts are full of religious righteousness but lack logic, research, and real facts. So when Chick Publications made Dark Dungeons tract 1984 it was made in that same spirit. The tract claimed that D&D spell were real and could be used to corrupt and effect others, meetings with robed cult members at higher player character levels, and committing suicide if your character dies are just a few of the evil things about D&D.

Now the end of this story should be that the tract was a joke in role playing circles but J.R. Ralls had other ideas. After winning a thousand dollars in the lottery, Ralls wrote Jack Chick to buy the movie rights to Dark Dungeons and adapt the tract as close as possible into a movie. For some reason they said yes and then the magic of making a movie happened.

The story follows Debbie and Marcie. Two born again freshmen university students who are looking forward their time at school. After their orientation session, an older student Mike, warns the girls about the popular kids on campus and how getting involved with them will only lead to problems. At this university all the popular students play role playing games. Despite the warning the girls accept an invite from the role playing group to attend a party. It starts out like another normal party with loud music, alcohol, and photogenic people showing off how photogenic they are. With the party this exciting, everyone feels it's time to shut off the music and quietly watch a group of people describe what they are doing while rolling dice.

This starts Debbie and Marcie's corruption into Satanism and evil. Also, Debbie and Marcie's friendship starts to have problems as Debbie is selected to learn real magic and be one of the popular role players. Things get even worse when Marcie's character gets killed, kicked out of the role playing group, and ends up killing herself. Distraught over her friend's death, Debbie is at a loss as to what she should do next when Mike comes back into the picture. He has been praying and fasting for Debbie and he has a way to free her from this evil. She has to accept Jesus into her life and burn all her D&D stuff in a big bonfire.

Overall it is an okay movie. There is a lot of inside jokes in the movie that detracts from the overall enjoyment of the movie. Examples would be knowing about the insanity that are Chick tracts and various incidents that people have blamed on D&D. It's worth a watch but don't go out of your way to find this unless this sounds like your thing.


MVP: Possessing the balls to buy the rights for this thing and make just as insane as the original source material.



Make or Break: The unexplained references and inside gamer jokes did a lot to take me out of the film.

Score: 4.5 out of 10



Monday, December 12, 2016

Duck Soup (1933)






Directed by: Leo McCarey
Run Time: 68 minutes

A cynical political satire preformed by four madmen and no ducks were harmed or made into soup. Which is kind of expected with the level of madness that is the Marx Brothers. For those who know nothing about the Marx Brothers here is a hasty and quick summary of them. First is Gummo Marx, he never made the transition from Vaudeville to film but he was part of the Marx Brothers so I am mentioning him. Next is Zeppo Marx, he played a straight man non comedic role. This movie is the last film he will appear in. There is Chico Marx who plays a comedic stereotype of slow witted Midwestern Americans. Harpo Marx has a mop of curly blonde hair and doesn't say a word. Instead he uses horns and other noise making devices a lot. Finally there is Groucho Marx with his bushy mustache and acidic wit. If you have even seen an episode of MASH where Hawkeye Pierce (Alan Alda) is acting comedic and he is paying homage to Groucho Marx. Now that's out of the way on to the plot of this movie.

There isn't one. In it's place there is a frame work that moves the comedy sketches forward and keeps the film from devolving into utter madness. Anyways, the story takes place in Freedonia. A country that has mismanaged itself into financial problems and the only person that can save the country is the widowed Mrs. Teasdale. She will bail the country out but they have to make Rufus T. Firefly (Groucho Marx) as the president. So farewell to the old president and hello to the disaster that is Rufus' presidency.

The neighboring country Sylvania would also like the vast wealth of the widowed Mrs. Teasdale. However Mrs. Teasdale is smitten with Rufus T. Firefly and the leader of Sylvania is not going to put up with this. To discredit and destroy Rufus, the leader of Slyvania hires Chico and Harpo  to be spies and saboteurs in Freedonia. Instead the two of them manage screw up every assignment. Worse, Rufus lead Freedonia to war through incompetence and a musical number. That's all there is for plot.

The rest of this movie is Groucho being an amusing troll with with sharp and acidic wit. Zeppo setting up jokes for Groucho, and Chico and Harpo are being amusing and insane while preforming humorous physical comedy. The other thing about the comedy preformed in this movie is that comedy still works after eighty years. A fair amount of the jokes in the movie can be classified as Dad jokes (jokes that are loaded with cheese but can be told around children) but they are funny. If you have a chance to watch this madness in film form please do so. It's an entertaining ride.


MVT: Rufus talking about easy this war thing is until someone points out that the people he had been shooting were his own troops.

Make or Break: What makes this movie is the humor is not forced. The Marx Brothers make being funny and entertaining look like the easiest thing to do.

Score: 7.5 out of 10

Saturday, October 18, 2014

The Gays (2014)

Bob Gay-Paris (Chris Tanner), the transsexual matriarch of the titular family (which includes dad Rod played by Frank Holliday and younger son Tommy played by Flip Jorgensen), rolls through an extensively demented monologue for her baby boy Alex (soon to be played by Mike Russnak, but here played by the camera).  She has grand plans for her son, from rivaling Jeff Stryker to “master[ing] the tambourine” and with a hell of a lot in between.  Forward to “present day” 1997, where Alex and Kevin (Nicholas Wilder) meet at a local bar and strike up a conversation.  While nursing their beers, Alex lets Kevin in on the philosophy his family practices as well as preaches.

The Gays is writer/director T.S. Slaughter’s second feature, and it’s certainly an interesting piece of work.  Its central conceit is that the scenes wherein the family interacts with one another are sending up traditional family sitcoms.  But I think it’s not so much concerned with the form of the sitcom and its tropes as it is with the content.  The filmmakers here eschew a typical sitcom three-camera setup, and while we get similar framing for various scenes set in the same rooms, this movie gravitates toward more cinematic shooting and editing, especially in the scenes set at home.  Here much of the camera work is handheld, and they’re not afraid to shoot from low angles.  The use of jump cuts during continuous action (I’m thinking here of a spectacularly overwrought fit that Bob throws) and the repetition of phrases in fast succession fracture time and emphasize mood in ways regular sitcoms would never do.  Surprisingly, I only counted two sequences where a laugh track was included.  Conversely, the scenes in the bar are those closest in approach to standard sitcom form.  These scenes are also the oases of sanity amidst the rest of the film’s action, and Kevin acts as the incredulous audience member trying to process what he and we are witnessing.  As counterpoint to the scenes with the Gays, it’s a pretty smart move. 

 
Traditionally, family sitcoms are concerned with teaching life lessons, and this film is no different.  Nonetheless, the lessons Rod and Bob impart to their sons, while they could definitely be considered life lessons, are more about raising Alex and Tommy to be gay sociopaths.  I’ll give you a few examples.  After Alex neglects taking sexual advantage of his friend Billy (Roberto Larancuent) during a sleepover, Rod makes Alex get into “the Sling” and then has Billy fuck him.  This is shot undercranked (or I guess we can just say sped up for stuff now shot on digital, couldn’t we?) and set to Gioachino Rossini’s William Tell Overture.  Alex’s straight friend Chris (Matthew Benjamin) is forced to fellate Rod as a thank you for dinner and also because Alex is always forced to watch football when they’re at Chris’ house.  The boys are taught all about the perineum (that space between a man’s scrotum and anus, also known as the “taint” [the pronunciation I’ve always known it as rather than “haint,” which seems more popular in some circles, but I digress…]).  This inbred insanity is reinforced particularly (for me) by off-kilter, extreme closeups of Bob cackling like The Cryptkeeper (okay, maybe not quite that shrill).  

The behavior of the Gays is presented as untethered, not only to the viewers watching the movie but also to Kevin, a member of the gay community.  He can barely believe what he’s hearing.  So, even to other gays the Gays are considered kind of abnormal, and I think this is a comment on the way homosexuality is often portrayed in popular culture.  Additionally, it’s a sensory smack to the back of the head for the ignorati who genuinely (no matter how inexplicably) believe that this is the sort of thing that gay people actually do at home.  By extension, then, it’s also a satirical retort to the people who think that gay marriage perverts and destroys “traditional family values.”  But in the same way that the work of John Waters revels in its trashiness, Slaughter and company embrace the absurdities they put forth.

Now, The Gays is far from a perfect film, and it is absolutely not for everyone.  It’s quite graphic, and makes no bones (pardon the pun) about being so.  There are glimmers of visual skill on display, but they’re also inconsistent.  While this is an expectation of movies shot with little to no budget, it doesn’t prevent such things from standing out.  Furthermore, the scenes which are the most fun to watch can also be the toughest to take.  And it’s not the ideas.  Many of the ideas here are great, including a Brady Bunch theme song parody titled “Each Other’s Lunch,” a board game mashup of Monopoly and Trivial Pursuit called Eat A Pussy Or Be A Pussy, and a Christmas scene which proves to be most instructive for the lads.  The problem for me is much the same as the problem that I have with a lot of Troma’s output.  All these antics tend to be a bit of an onslaught over time, and if that’s something you’re not predisposed to, it can be off-putting.  Thankfully, Slaughter never goes quite far enough to completely wear out his welcome, and the belly laughs his film generates are honestly earned.

 
MVT:  Slaughter shows off some nice filmmaking chops, and if nothing else, his work here is largely successful in its ambitiousness.  

Make or Break:  There is a riff on The Exorcist that is funny, revolting, and witty all at the same time.  You can feel here that the filmmakers have a fondness for the source material, and it doesn’t come off as cynical like a lot of these things tend to do.

Score:  6.25/10

For more info about The Gays, visit their website:  http://thegaysmovie.com/index.html

Monday, September 8, 2014

Episode #303: Lord Love a Striker

Welcome back for some more of that GGtMC goodness!!!

This week Sammy and Will are joined by Tom Deja from the Better in the Dark podcast for coverage of Lord Love A Duck (1966) directed by George Axelrod and Striker (1988) directed by Enzo G. Casteralli!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_303.mp3 
 
Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Adios!!!



Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Episode #266: Underground 2000

Welcome back for another episode of the GGtMC!!!

THis week we have a couple Kickstarter picks from Martin and Ryan and they chose some diverse films for us to discuss. Martin chose Underground (1995) directed by Emir Kusturica and Ryan chose any Billy Blanks joint so we went with TC 2000 (1993) starring Blanks, Bolo Yeung, Jalal Mehri and Matthias Hues!!! We thank them for the support and the selections!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_266.mp3 
 
Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Voicemails to 206-666-5207

Adios!!!



Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Smile (1975)

I hate reality TV shows.  Wait.  Let me try to be more specific.  I hate modern reality TV shows.  Oh, I didn’t always.  I admit I actually liked the first few seasons of The Real World.  Never mind that MTV had been in danger of being irrelevant as early as 1984 (feel free to debate the merits of that statement).  The idea of bringing together a microcosm of young adults and giving the viewer access to some of the most personal moments (or at least what we assumed were the most personal moments, since the majority of drama on the show was, if not manufactured, certainly not entirely truthful) was a good one; Come to understand people different from yourself by observing a representative (black, Latino, gay, Irish, white, whatever) go through their daily life.    It was never going to be as groundbreaking as 1973’s An American Family nor as honest, and in short order the whole affair became about celebrity rather than comprehension.  It became more important to be a spotlight-hogging jerkoff than a bona fide member of the human race (and the question of whether they’re one and the same should keep you up at night).  

So, naturally, reality TV (a misnomer in the extreme) became more and more prevalent.  Why?  Well, in my mind, there are two reasons.  One, producers realized that for much less money than a scripted show, they could make huge profits (and it’s called “show business” not “show charity”).  Two, they appeal to human beings’ morbid curiosity to gawk at others’ misfortunes, like rubbernecking at a car accident.  The problem is what does this say about us as a society?  More people know about Beard Wars than they do about the war in Afghanistan.  More people give a bigger shit about who will win American Idol than they do about who will win the next presidential election.  More people can name the “cast members” of Hardcore Pawn than can name the countries which made up the Axis in World War Two.   It now seems that absolutely everyone in the world, regardless of how inconsequential they are (perceived or otherwise) can have a reality TV show.  When Andy Warhol stated that, “in the future, everyone will be world-famous for fifteen minutes” in 1968, it’s arguable whether or not he foresaw the reign of reality TV off on the horizon.  His quote rings more of a curse than it does a prophecy, from this vantage point at least.  It’s rare for me to not consider other viewpoints when thinking about these sorts of things, but it bears repeating: I hate reality TV.  You should, too.  It lowers not only those on display but those watching it.  It’s the modern equivalent of the geek show.  And when’s the last time they were thought of as acceptable entertainment?  Now, you can argue the other side until you’re blue in the face.  And you would be wrong.  I feel dirty just discussing it for this length of time, and I can certainly go on, but we’re here to talk about Michael Ritchie’s Smile (you got the screed for free; you’re welcome).

The Young American Miss pageant is underway, and the event in Santa Rosa, California will choose who goes on to the National contest from that state.  The film centers on several of the teen girls, including Robin (Joan Prather), Doria (Annette O’Toole), and Connie (Colleen Camp).  Running the pageant is Wilson (Geoffrey Lewis), and he is assisted by Brenda (Barbara Feldon), and head judge Big Bob (Bruce Dern).  But as the competition draws nearer, the personal lives of the entrants and the officials complicate things.

As a satire of pageant mentality, the film succeeds marvelously.  By basing the structure on duality, screenwriter Jerry Belson is able to focus on surfaces, both in our fascination with them as well as the way they mask truth.  For every scene of teen girls smiling, dancing, or answering inane questions, we get scenes of the tribulations of the girls and pageant officials.  Brenda’s husband Andy (Nicholas Pryor) is the suicidal town drunk.  Big Bob’s son, Little Bob (Eric Shea), and his pals have a pervy scheme going to make money off nude Polaroids of the girls.  Big-shot choreographer Tony French (Michael Kidd) is on the skids and desperate for work.  Newcomer Robin doesn’t understand how pageants work but gets an education from roommate Doria.  The point is, most of these characters are absolutely miserable when they’re not “on.”  As Brenda tells the girls early on, “just be yourselves, and keep smiling.”  This is not simply advice for aspiring contestants, this is how these characters cope with their lives.  It’s better to put on a happy face and be tormented inside than to let anyone ever think that everything is absolutely honky dory.  

Big Bob sums it up to Andy best: “I just learned a long time ago to accept a little less from life, that’s all.”  This is why Big Bob is the happiest person in the film, alone or in public.  He has trained himself to be happy being unhappy.  This is why he espouses the traditional values professed in the pageant “manifesto.”  He does believe in them, because he needs to believe in them.  To confront that life is anything less than perfect based on what you’re given is to confront his entire life as a lie and to admit that he is dissatisfied. 

Conversely, it is Andy who sums up Big Bob perfectly: “You’re a goddamned Young American Miss.”   
The absurdity of the goings-on make up the core of the film’s humor, but it’s entirely plausible.  The girls are interviewed by the judges and given generally slow pitch questions, and almost to a person, they answer the questions with some version of the good they want to do with their life, the charity they want to contribute to, and the succor they want to give to their fellow man.  Of course, Robin then gets asked about her views on abortion (by the priest on the panel).  But after floundering for a bit, she comes back with the “pageant-ready” statement that she’s glad she isn’t young enough to vote.  What’s interesting here is twofold.  One, Robin resists becoming like the more aggressive, exploitive girls, but we see instances where she begins to bare her teeth.  It’s subtle, never arch, and very effective both in writing and in performance.  Two, the filmmakers understand that beauty pageants are purposeless displays of hot flesh masquerading as substantive showcases for truly talented young people.  Yet, they never rub the viewers face in this.  They know what’s going on and they give the audience credit for knowing, as well and not patronizing them by taking easy shots.  

This is also part of the film’s biggest problem which is its pacing.  While it starts off at a breakneck pace, flipping between characters, the film soon finds itself getting mired down in trying to be equable to too many of its characters.  It gives us long scenes which have nothing at all to do with the contest, and it kills the frenetic momentum built up in those scenes.  But it must also be stated that the filmmakers’ care and investment in the characters shows through.  These are not strictly one-dimensional people, and the lengthy sketching out of their individual foibles goes a long way in illustrating the point that this truly is a microcosm in the film, not in what we see but in what we don’t.  In summation, then, the film is highly entertaining, hysterically funny at times, and thoughtfully conceived so you get more than a great Comedy.  But it’s a great Comedy, too.

MVT:  The script by Belson is razor sharp in its dialogue and the interplay between the characters.  We do feel bad for these people in as much as we enjoy laughing at the ridiculousness of their lives.  It’s a difficult trick to pull off, and while it doesn’t pull it off without a few bumps, it does pull it off.

Make Or Break:  The talent portions of the pageant Make the film.  They are not a single scene, and more often than not, are snippets rather than whole acts, but they are believably ludicrous, and I personally almost did spit takes at several points.  Ah, comedy.

Score:  7/10

**Like this review?  Share it with a friend.  Hate it?  Share it with an enemy.**

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

TerrorVision (1986)



Plato's Retreat was a Manhattan swinger's club started in the late 1970s by Larry Levenson. It basically gave people who want to have unfettered, heterosexual (and this was stressed by the management, though lesbianism was okay) intercourse a place to do so. The club and its owner(s) espoused the sort of hedonism that the era was known for before the rise of HIV/AIDS called attention to the perils of promiscuous, unprotected sex. Reportedly, Levenson structured the rules to ensure that the women outnumbered the men, and he provided multiple amenities for its members, including a sauna and pool. If you've ever seen the type of people who frequented discos (or were one yourself), then you know that they had a sort of primitivistic quality that seemed to produce a fine coating of…something with which they were perpetually glazed. I can only hope that Plato's Retreat had the overwhelming smell of chlorine permeating every square inch, at least some indication that the proprietors attempted to keep the premises and its (very) public conveniences somewhat hygienic. Unfortunately, I'd be willing to gamble that this was not the case, and the pool alone probably looked like the chunder-filled pool of Ted Nicolaou's TerrorVision. Now I don't know (nor do I care to know) what your particular bent is, but the mere thought of fuzzy, chunky, possibly-living things crawling all over my nethers is simply unromantic, my son.

Over a marvelously cheapjack alien world establishing shot, we are informed that we are on the planet Pluton looking at the Mutant Creature Disposal Unit section of the planetary Sanitation Department. Alien Pluthar (William Paulson) wrestles a mutant into the disposal and zaps the being off into space (via a cleverly undisguised USS Enterprise [the interstellar one, not the nautical one] model). After bouncing (replete with "funny" sound effects) off multiple planets as if they were pinball bumpers, the signal carrying the mutant winds up hitting (you guessed it) Earth. Meanwhile, jumpsuited, ascot-sporting dullard, Stanley Putterman (Gerrit Graham), finishes up installing his new satellite dish, while wife, Raquel (Mary Woronov), aerobicizes. Son, Sherman (Chad Allen), runs war games with military- and absent-minded Grampa (Bert Remsen), and punk daughter, Suzy (Diane Franklin), leaves to go on a date with metalhead boyfriend, O.D. (Jonathan Gries). I'll give you three guesses where the monster from the prologue lands.

Nicolaou's film (produced by the Brothers Band under the Empire Pictures banner) is first and foremost a satire of the "Me Generation" and their progeny. The screenplay (also written by Nicolaou) divides the characters up into three distinct subsets, each a broad stereotype. So, Stanley and Raquel are hedonistic swingers solely focused on their own pleasures. Suzy and O.D. are dimwitted, heavy metal enthusiasts. Sherman (as in the tank, get it?) and Grampa are warmongers who want to shoot first, ask questions later. When MAD Magazine does a satire (or at least when they used to), they very cleverly highlighted the most egregious faults of a movie, show, and/or genre in the short space they were provided. It helped that they were drawn in a caricatured style by such greats as Mort Drucker, Angelo Torres, Jack Davis, and others. They played, because they were already removed from reality by their medium, but to do the same in a live-action feature film is not nearly so easy. For starters, there's a lot of time to fill, and if you repeatedly crack the audience over the head with the same joke, they will tire of it quickly. Further, you have to overcome the hurdle of dealing with actors rather than drawings. Viewers instinctually want to connect with actors they see on screen (this is, after all, one of the primary reasons they go to the movies in the first place). But when they see a live-action cartoon peopled with one-dimensional parodies, there is a disconnect. 

Naturally, a film can still be effective and even enjoyable despite these things, but they are obstacles that require a deft hand behind the camera. Nicolau tries by filming the movie primarily on soundstages, thus granting himself a large degree of control (in theory). His lighting is garish and unnatural, similar to Bava's, and even the sky in the distance is purple and pink. The Putterman's are art consumers ("I know a place where you can get all this stuff real cheap") of the tackiest sort. Every painting on their walls has at least one bare nipple, and several depict light bondage. The Roman-style statue in the foyer has breasts that act as fountains. Every character is self-centered in one way or another, and their immobility in this regard makes them unappetizing (to the viewer, perhaps, but not to the monster). As I said, though, since the characters are only skin-deep in every conceivable way, you not only don't care what happens to them, but you want it to hurry up and happen faster. It's possible that this dearth of character was intended by Nicolaou as part of the lampoon, but it comes off mostly as lazy writing.

The filmmakers also use the film as a mild critique of television culture. The monster enters the house through the televisions. The characters think that Pluthar is a character in a movie when they see him pleading for us humans to render our TV sets inoperable for the next two hundred years. Grampa believes that only war stories and horror movies are educational, because they focus on survival (that's actually pretty sound reasoning). Horror host, Medusa (Jennifer Richards), dresses like a monster and puts on a performance while on air, but off air, she's just another egocentric phony. The concept of television being both alluring and dangerous is nothing new. Cronenberg's Videodrome covered the bases on the subject thoroughly. It's a subject that is ripe for investigation, but TerrorVision only gives it cursory attention (except in its background/symbolic context). The filmmakers also use real B-movie footage, rather than taking the time and (more importantly) money to come up with their own mini-parodies. And this leads to one of the film's biggest weaknesses. It is never consistent enough or fully committed enough to come together at the end. The characters flip-flop from likable to unlikable, reasonable to unreasonable and back for no other reason than that's how the director needs them to act for that scene. While there are some interesting notions in the film and it's worth a perfunctory glance (and it must be said, Graham and Woronov are excellent, as always), it's as if Nicolaou were channel-surfing in his mind as he wrote the screenplay. And that can be really annoying when you're not in control of the remote.

MVT: Buechler's monster is slimy and interesting to look at (and you get to see a lot of it), and best of all, it's huge. You have to give the man credit for being able to pull off a creature creation like that for a low budget film. You get the feeling that everyone was so impressed with it that they included it in more of the picture and rightfully so.

Make Or Break: The moment that Grampa shows up in military dress with toy fighter jets glued to his hat, the viewer suddenly realizes that they can erase all hope for any attempt at subtlety from their minds. From that point on, whether you enjoy the film or not depends completely and utterly on how easy you are to please. I admit I can be a little more difficult in this regard than some.

Score: 5.5/10

**Like this review?  Share it with a friend.  Hate it?  Share it with an enemy.**