jason-users Mailing List for jason

Hi Amandine,

Many many thanks for finding these bugs, you are certainly right that 
the behaviours should be the same. Unfortunately I cannot help as the 
unification mechanism in Jason was completely re-implemented by Jomi 
some years ago, so it's best if he has a look at it, and he is currently 
on holidays.

Just as a separate comment, one thing to always remember when deleting 
beliefs is that belief addition and deletion from plan bodies always 
include a "source(self)" annotation unless you excplicitly add a source 
annotation to it.

Cheers,

Rafael


On 26/07/2019 16:38, Amandine Mayima wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I noticed two behaviors that I was not expecting:
> 
> Behavior 1 :
> 
> I have in my belief base one belief that I want to remove : 
> mybelief(abc)[annot1(d)]
> If I do -mybelief(_), the belief is not removed because if ( ! 
> t1s.hasSubsetAnnot(t2s, this)) of Unifier line 317 returns false with 
> t1s=mybelief(abc)[annot1(d)] and t2s=mybelief(_) (called by line 962 in 
> Agent)
> If I do -mybelief(abc), the belief is removed because this time the 
> variable bl of DefaultBeliefBase line 173 is not null (which is normal) 
> and then annots are analyzed with if (l.hasSubsetAnnot(bl)) with 
> l=mybelief(abc) and bl=mybelief(abc)[annot1(d)]. Here we can notice that 
> the order of evaluation of hasSubsetAnnot is in reverse order compared 
> to the previous case.
> 
> I would expect both to behave the same, or there is something that I 
> don't understand.
> 
> Behavior 2 :
> 
> I have in my belief base one belief that I want to remove : 
> mybelief(abc)[source(robot)]
> 
> if I do -mybelief(abc)[source(_)], the belief is not removed because 
> hasSubsetAnnot line 174 from the DefaultBeliefBase returns false because 
> in Pred class line 335 c = myAnnot.compareTo(t) = 1 because compareTo in 
> UnnamedVar which calls compareTo in VarTerm returns 1.
> If I do -mybelief(_)[source(_)], the belief is removed, I didn't have 
> time to analyzed why.
> 
> I hope I've been clear and that you will be able to enlighten me.
> 
> Have a nice week-end,
> 
> Amandine
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jason-users mailing list
> Jas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jason-users
> 

Hello,

I noticed two behaviors that I was not expecting:

Behavior 1 :

I have in my belief base one belief that I want to remove : 
mybelief(abc)[annot1(d)]
If I do -mybelief(_), the belief is not removed because if ( ! 
t1s.hasSubsetAnnot(t2s, this)) of Unifier line 317 returns false with 
t1s=mybelief(abc)[annot1(d)] and t2s=mybelief(_) (called by line 962 in 
Agent)
If I do -mybelief(abc), the belief is removed because this time the 
variable bl of DefaultBeliefBase line 173 is not null (which is normal) 
and then annots are analyzed with if (l.hasSubsetAnnot(bl)) with 
l=mybelief(abc) and bl=mybelief(abc)[annot1(d)]. Here we can notice that 
the order of evaluation of hasSubsetAnnot is in reverse order compared 
to the previous case.

I would expect both to behave the same, or there is something that I 
don't understand.

Behavior 2 :

I have in my belief base one belief that I want to remove : 
mybelief(abc)[source(robot)]

if I do -mybelief(abc)[source(_)], the belief is not removed because 
hasSubsetAnnot line 174 from the DefaultBeliefBase returns false because 
in Pred class line 335 c = myAnnot.compareTo(t) = 1 because compareTo in 
UnnamedVar which calls compareTo in VarTerm returns 1.
If I do -mybelief(_)[source(_)], the belief is removed, I didn't have 
time to analyzed why.

I hope I've been clear and that you will be able to enlighten me.

Have a nice week-end,

Amandine