In what now looks like an alternative version of 1989, the USA and the USSR
have decided on complete nuclear disarmament and an official end to the Cold
War. Veteran Green Beret Sergeant Johnny Gallagher (Gene Hackman) belongs to the
mass of soldiers running security at the final negotiations concerning the
matter. Or in his case, securing an outer perimeter.
After he and his men stumble into the assassination of a US officer by what
the audience already knows is a conspiracy between Soviet and US hardliners to
stop the peace process at any cost, he is very suddenly ordered to transport a
military prisoner, one supposed Walter Henke (Tommy Lee Jones), to the US. Once
arrived on US soil, Gallagher is attacked and knocked out while his charge
absconds. Gallagher, being old, stubborn, and Gene Hackman, is smelling
bullshit, and soon teams up with his also military ex-wife (Joanna Cassidy), and
later a Chicago vice cop (Dennis Franz) to find his prisoner. Since he quickly
realizes the man he brought to the US isn’t actually Walter Henke, and finds
himself framed for murder to boot, Gallagher’s soon concentrating on finding out
what the hell’s actually going on, perhaps saving world peace in the process.
That’ll teach conspirators to screw with old school sergeants, I suppose.
The plot of Andrew Davis’s conspiracy/action thriller The Package is
actually a bit more complicated than that, but thanks to a clear presentation by
Davis and a script by John Bishop that usually focuses on providing the audience
with the right information at the right time, it actually feels rather
straightforward, in a good way. Now, you might argue that the conspiracy seems
needlessly complicated, actually includes too many people who need to get killed
for it to work, and really stops working as a plan at all once the public
shoot-outs start, but its execution on screen works fine and never feels
terribly preposterous even when it should.
The film’s plausibility is certainly increased by the resonances it has with
the greatest hits of violent US politics like the Kennedy assassination and the
nasty stuff US intelligence services have gotten up to throughout their
existence. The cast helps there, too, with Hackman probably playing this sort of
thing in his sleep yet still providing Gallagher with enough personality and
sheer stubbornness to absolutely make him the guy to root for here; it’s also
fascinating to watch a late 80s action movie whose hero isn’t a violent asshole
but only ever kills in absolutely self-defence. The rest of the actors are as
dependable and convincing as expected, with Cassidy, Jones, Franz, John Heard
and Pam Grier in a way too small role all fleshing out what are at their core
pretty plot functional roles.
From time to time, the film does look a little like an enhanced TV movie. As
a rule – and for my tastes – Davis is a competent and effective but also
somewhat too functional kind of director, absolutely able to direct this sort of
thing effectively but keeping things a bit too tidy and controlled when a bit
more chaos might make things more exciting or simply more interesting.
Still, The Package is a well done film that moves through its
particular genre space with a degree of intelligence while providing a healthy
dose of excitement. Which may sound like me damning with faint praise again, but
is actually me complimenting a movie on a job well done.
Showing posts with label dennis franz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dennis franz. Show all posts
Sunday, November 17, 2019
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
In short: Die Hard 2 (1990)
Clearly, the only way to top an instant classic like the first Die
Hard is to make a film that is basically the same but just a little
different than the original, and definitely louder and bigger. However, Renny
Harlin’s sequel still features a relatively constrained place for John McClane
(who else but Bruce Willis again?) to get increasingly beat up in.
If you squint a little, you can see hints about the wrong direction the series will head towards in the future, but even though this one softens the class politics of the first film quite a bit – not so much discerning between working class and bosses anymore but more aiming for people willing to do their actual jobs versus those there only to play politics – and doesn’t really feature any of the random moments of veracity I loved particularly in the first one, there’s still quite a bit of humanity in here to ground the action. After all, how many other big loud US action movies are there whose hero breaks down crying after not managing to save an airplane full of people? Or how many of them realize that, if you want to make a guy’s wife (a returning Bonnie Bedelia with slightly less frightening hair than in the first film) a part of the film’s emotional and very real stake, you really need to show her coping with her own duress, too, which also turns her from a price to be won into a person an audience wants to see saved?
While it is completely outrageous and far-fetched, the sequel’s plot is still also well-constructed in its unfolding, playing fair with its plot twists, and not so much aiming to provide an excuse for the action sequences but making them an organic part of a flow. Things need to move in an action movie, is what I’m saying (alas too late for the writers of the next Die Hard film to hear), and it’s even better when they move in interesting and fun directions even when nothing explodes.
Speaking of explosions, I believe Harlin was at the time the second best director of big US action movies (after Die Hard’s John McTiernan, obviously), and it shows here. There’s an appropriate heft to many of the action sequences but also a sense of good fun that turns the potentially annoying smart-ass moments of the film into something enjoyable, like a corny joke told by a good friend.
If you squint a little, you can see hints about the wrong direction the series will head towards in the future, but even though this one softens the class politics of the first film quite a bit – not so much discerning between working class and bosses anymore but more aiming for people willing to do their actual jobs versus those there only to play politics – and doesn’t really feature any of the random moments of veracity I loved particularly in the first one, there’s still quite a bit of humanity in here to ground the action. After all, how many other big loud US action movies are there whose hero breaks down crying after not managing to save an airplane full of people? Or how many of them realize that, if you want to make a guy’s wife (a returning Bonnie Bedelia with slightly less frightening hair than in the first film) a part of the film’s emotional and very real stake, you really need to show her coping with her own duress, too, which also turns her from a price to be won into a person an audience wants to see saved?
While it is completely outrageous and far-fetched, the sequel’s plot is still also well-constructed in its unfolding, playing fair with its plot twists, and not so much aiming to provide an excuse for the action sequences but making them an organic part of a flow. Things need to move in an action movie, is what I’m saying (alas too late for the writers of the next Die Hard film to hear), and it’s even better when they move in interesting and fun directions even when nothing explodes.
Speaking of explosions, I believe Harlin was at the time the second best director of big US action movies (after Die Hard’s John McTiernan, obviously), and it shows here. There’s an appropriate heft to many of the action sequences but also a sense of good fun that turns the potentially annoying smart-ass moments of the film into something enjoyable, like a corny joke told by a good friend.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)