The Babysitter (2017): Kid (Judah Lewis) learns his
beloved/lusted after babysitter (Samara Weaving) and her friends are satanists
of the type really into human sacrifice and playing truth or dare to warm up;
also, milking the blood of the innocent. A night of somewhat bloody mayhem
ensues.
Given his usual predilections, this shallow horror comedy directed for
Netflix by the name-disabled McG is downright un-annoying, keeping the
pseudo-hip ad-man style the guy’s been using for a decade now somewhat in check
enough to actually tell a straightforward tale in an effective, well-paced
manner. The film generally manages to ignore all the best opportunities talking
– or making decent jokes – about all kinds of interesting stuff connected to the
meaning of being a grown-up, burgeoning sexuality and so on and so forth and
trades it in for pretty young people, a lot of blood, and an okay
rollercoaster-style time. It’s a perfectly okay way to spend (less than) ninety
minutes with pretty, moving, mildly bloody pictures without much behind
them.
Kwaidan aka Kaidan (1964): On the absolute
opposite of the horror movie spectrum stands Masaki Kobayashi’s venerable
classic of a horror anthology based on Lafcadio Hearn’s versions of Japanese
ghost tales. It’s slow-moving, artfully stylized, mixing moments deeply informed
by Japanese theatrical forms with techniques right out of the German
expressionist handbook as well as others as state of the art of filmmaking in
1964 as you’d expect of a Japanese film. It’s a movie that manages to be at once
deeply rooted in traditional Japanese culture and aim for the universal as it is
expressed through ghost stories, filtered through a the work of a man who wasn’t
Japanese by birth. Given its three hour running time and its calm and theatrical
air, one might fear this is the kind of “classic” mostly feeling worthy and dead
like certain museum pieces do, but in truth, the film’s still challenging and
moving, at times creepy, at other times bizarre, and absolutely daring in the
way Kobayashi expects his audience to follow him in seemingly peculiar
directions. Of course, following him is extremely rewarding.
It Comes at Night (2017): Supposedly the straightforward
horror follow-up to Shults’s incredible Krisha, this is actually a film that seems to very
consciously – just look at the title and what doesn’t happen in the film! -
evade explanations and exposition that would help an audience make sense of its
in theory simple viral post-apocalypse tale. What exactly is the nature of the
illness striking the world? Is it a metaphor for inner tensions and fractures of
the film’s characters more than an actual disease? Are the nightmares of the
film’s viewpoint character (Kelvin Harrison Jr.) only an expression of his
anxiety and fear, an early symptom of the infection, or a hint at the
supernatural? This and more the film’s not going to explain. What you get
instead is a movie about a breaking and broken family unit during an ambiguous
apocalypse, filmed with a mounting sense of dread and acted brilliantly by
Harrison, Joel Edgerton, Carmen Ejogo, Riley Keough and Christopher Abbott,
moving slowly but surely.
I’m not completely sure the film needs to be quite this ambiguous
about so many things, but as a mood piece and a portrait of human
self-destruction, the film’s very successful to my eyes.
Showing posts with label trey edward shults. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trey edward shults. Show all posts
Saturday, October 28, 2017
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
In short: Krisha (2015)
I believe there’s hardly a more typical stage for an US indie movie than a
family thanksgiving dinner, but then, that’s probably the only thing in Trey
Edward Shults’s film you’d describe as typical. Made for a piddling
sum, mostly with members of the director’s family - like the director’s aunt
Krisha Farichild in a truly incredible performance in the title role - and close
friends in front and behind of the camera, this is a heart-breaking film about
everything that divides us from the people we are meant to be closest to. The
film charts breaks and breaking points between and inside of its characters
relentlessly, finding the moments of greatest hurt without expositing about
them, and without ever looking away. Yet Shults never loses compassion either,
not just for Krisha, a recovering alcoholic making a doomed attempt to mend
bridges where she should probably rather first have tried to secure phone lines,
but for the people she’s hurt, too – usually for everyone at once, making it
nearly impossible for a viewer to make it easy on herself and choose a character
as The Bad Guy. This makes for harrowing viewing, to say the least – though the
film can at times be drily funny too – as painfully honest art sometimes
does.
Stylistically, Shults often uses techniques usually connected to the horror genre, not as a way to distance himself ironically from what he is showing nor the audience from what it is seeing, but because what we are seeing – or rather experiencing – indeed is a horror film for everyone involved. In fact, I suspect adding a masked killer to the proceedings would probably improve the characters’ day immensely.
Emotionally, Krisha is as touching as films go, demonstrating how great, involved filmmaking and what I can only describe as conviction and clarity of vision can move the most jaded viewer.
Stylistically, Shults often uses techniques usually connected to the horror genre, not as a way to distance himself ironically from what he is showing nor the audience from what it is seeing, but because what we are seeing – or rather experiencing – indeed is a horror film for everyone involved. In fact, I suspect adding a masked killer to the proceedings would probably improve the characters’ day immensely.
Emotionally, Krisha is as touching as films go, demonstrating how great, involved filmmaking and what I can only describe as conviction and clarity of vision can move the most jaded viewer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)