Wednesday, February 27, 2019
In short: Agonizando en el crimen (1968)
Eight months later, Jean hasn’t been able to cope with his wife’s death at all. He has broken off his studies, is avoiding his friends, and is generally squabbling with his father. Of course, given that his friends and his father are pretty horrid, we can’t blame him for that. More problematic is how Jean seems to at least half believe that Jaqueline is still alive and is somewhere waiting for him. Worse, he starts to develop the habit of murdering his old student friends (all training to be surgeons), cutting off their hands post mortem, and burying the extremities below Jaqueline’s beloved rose bushes. Oh well.
While all this certainly makes Enrique López Eguiluz’s rather obscure Agonizando en el crimen sound like an interesting Spanish giallo - partly shot in France to be even more international - the truth is the film’s obscurity is mostly deserved. The audience learns early on that Jean is the killer, so any way to have a proper whodunit is blocked, which of course doesn’t mean the film isn’t going to show us filler scenes of pointless police investigation. Alas Agonizando also isn’t trying to set up an interesting cat and mouse game.
Instead, the whole thing meanders through its running time, sometimes attempting to draw something of a psychological portrait of Jean but suffering from the tragic fact that star and writer Logar shows no psychological insight whatsoever. It’s not even the sort of weird giallo ideas about mental illness you’d expect of an early 70s film – Logar’s writing and his on-screen mugging rather suggest we are watching a film made in the 30s, and not a good one.
As an actor, Logar is completely wrong for the role in any case. Psychological subtlety is clearly beyond him but he also doesn’t show any of the charisma he’d need for a proper loud fun mad performance. What we get instead is a lot of sweating and making bug eyes. The whole thing is particularly disappointing because there is indeed an actor in the film who could have played the fun serial killer lead the film cries out for: Paul Naschy, old Waldemar Daninsky himself, has a small role as a nameless police inspector. He’d have played the hell out of this one, certainly never achieving (or trying for) psychological realism, but finding his home in the melodramatic theme of lost love leading to madness, and certainly giving the character the physicality it would have needed.
Eguiluz’s direction is mostly awkward, with little to recommend it beyond the usual clichés of 70s filmmaking, used badly. At its worst, the film doesn’t even seem to understand the concept of suspense. From time to time, usually when it’s murdering time, there is a shot or two that suggests at least an attempt at creating tension, but a couple of seconds of a shadow turning into Jean moodily creeping up a staircase doesn’t save Agonizando.
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Three Films Make A Post: Hell Hath No Fury...Like
Fieras Sin Jaula aka 2 Masks For Alexa (1971): When millionaire Ronald Marvelling's (Curd Jürgens) marriage to the much younger Alexa (Rosalba Neri) doesn't work out too well, he does the obvious - turning the bedroom in his vacation house in the Normandy into a steel cage where he commits suicide and imprisons Alexa and her lover Pietro (Juan Luis Galiardo).
Juan Logar's film may sound like a thriller or a giallo, but the whole middle part of its narrative is a long, long flashback that strictly belongs in the realm of the melodrama. Some of that is quite effective, presented with just the right sense of unreality, but there's an unpleasant tendency for moralizing finger-wagging that's never effective in an exploitation movie (see also: hypocrisy). The movie's final act then turns into a full-grown low budget delirium of sledgehammer visual metaphors, off-screen monologues, and arty ambitions that probably doesn't work like Logar wanted it to, but sure keeps things interesting enough.
And "interesting" is the word here: you'd be hard-pressed to call Fieras a good or a artistically successful movie, but interesting, it sure is.
The House In Marsh Road aka Invisible Creature (1960): It's the old chestnut about a husband trying to murder his wife for money (though the stakes here are comparatively low, financially speaking) and another woman (though the passion driving him looks not very passionate to me). To change things up a little, the heroine (Patricia Dainton) is protected by the family poltergeist.
Still, poltergeist or not, this is an exceedingly routine movie, directed by routine director Montgomery Tully, featuring routine actors, routine music and a routine script. There are certainly worse ways to spend seventy minutes, but excitement lives elsewhere.
Shirome (2010): One of the core questions of modern horror film is of course how to use the by now hoary old form of the fake documentary and still innovate. Koji Shiraishi (usually one of my favourites among the second tier of contemporary Japanese horror directors) isn't afraid of being a real innovator, and so gives us a fake documentary about the adventures of a teen idol girl group (played by a real-life teen idol girl group) in a haunted house, boldly uniting POV horror and idolsploitation. In some of his other films, Shiraishi had quite a bit of luck with using actresses and elements of idol culture (see Noroi), but those idols weren't a gaggle (or corps? a troupe? a squeal?) of teenage girls.
Not surprisingly, the movie at hand is pretty horrible, for the simple reason that, whenever it threatens to become even slightly creepy (Shiraishi, as you might know, can do "creepy" well), half a dozen teenage girls start to cry, squeak, shout, gibber, moan and play patty cake in the most headache-inducing manner and quite, quite independent of the creepiness or not-creepiness of what's happening around them, until nobody in their right minds wouldn't want these horrible, horrible girls to shut up forever (and probably die in a fire, silently).
On the positive side, at least the film's not in 3D.