Showing posts with label john savage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john savage. Show all posts

Sunday, July 9, 2023

The Dangerous (1995)

A Japanese brother and sister duo (Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa and Saemi Nakamura) with some unexplained ninjutsu expertise murder their way through the coke dealing underworld of New Orleans. Because the cops, not even the randomly named Random (Michael Paré), can’t really cope with this sort of thing, the corrupt powers that be manage to draw retired man of violence Davalos (Robert Davi) back in with one of those offers one can’t refuse.

For also unexplained reasons, Davalos isn’t just hot shit when it comes to killing people – as he proves early on in a shoot-out in a graveyard that mainly consists of everyone involved running backwards while shooting – he is also an expert in the made-up version of Japanese culture the film trades in. So teaming him up with Random makes perfect sense, and random doesn’t seem too phased by having to team up with a random (see what I did there?) thug.

On the negative side, Davalos also happens to be an old enemy of New Orleans coke kingpin Tito (Juan Fernández). Tito for his part believes his underlings are being killed by the cops – who always walk around with swords in this parallel universe New Orleans, one assumes – and hires a knife-wielding duo of killers going by Emile (John Savage) and Henri (Jim Youngs) Lautrec. I assume their brother Toulouse is out and about painting somewhere.

Various amateurishly staged action sequences occur.

If all of this sounds like a hot, overcomplicated mess, that is exactly what Rod Hewitt’s and David Winters’s The Dangerous is. A tale of crossed revenges shouldn’t be as complicated as this turns out to be, but Hewitt’s script somehow manages that feat by never explaining the things that need explaining, overexplaining what you never wanted to know, and dipping everything in a fat sauce of badly digested clichés about honour and revenge. Which somehow never leaves time for the film to actually find a way to gracefully go from one scene to the next. More often than not, this feels as if parts of the script where written after scenes had been shot, made to fit any which way.

While this does not lead to a tense, suspenseful action movie, it does provide the film with many opportunities to charm with bizarre moments. So there’s the mandatory one scene Elliott Gould cameo (this time around he’s a junkie slash projectionist and gets his cheeks grabbed by Davi in a truly awkward moment – so at least he’s working for his mortgage, or whatever else Gould needed to pay off at the time); an unhoused informant with a radar sense very useful when he’s stashed in a car trunk; the complete nonsensical “Japanese” “philosophy” generally accompanied by painful attempts of the score to “sound Japanese”; Fernández cackling maniacally and looking rather aroused when he lets the Lautrecs murder one of his underlings as a test; and so on and so forth.

All of this is enjoyable enough when you are of the disposition to find joy in the little things, and I’d even call The Dangerous a minor cheap shot action gem for this, if not for the sad fact that action direction and choreography are absolutely terrible. To add insult to injury, the action is badly edited and amateurishly filmed in a “what’s the worst angle to shoot any given moment from” kind of way, so much so that even old pros at looking interesting in shitty action sequences like most of the cast members are can’t do anything against it. Even worse, the locations – a cinema, that New Orleans graveyard including a jazz funeral, a high rise rooftop and so on – would be perfect for doing something clever and exciting with them. The filmmakers just don’t seem to be able to.

But at least, we will always have the merry ring of absurdities the non-action parts of The Dangerous churn out.

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Door to Silence (1992)

aka Door into Silence

Original title: Le porte del silenzio

Real estate business guy Melvin Devereux (John Savage), is trying to get from New Orleans to his home further South. But from the beginning of his travels he is beset by strange encounters and peculiar occurrences: a mysterious woman (Sandi Schultz) is mysterious towards him, promising a later encounter at a certain crossroads, perhaps for sex, perhaps for something very different indeed. Melvin repeatedly encounters a hearse whose driver seems hell-bent on getting him killed. Worse still, the hearse seems to be carrying the dead body of one Melvin Devereux, husband of Sylvia, like our protagonist is. The swampy byways of Louisiana are either blocked for various reasons, or roads seem to lead into dreams and visions, or simply not where they are supposed to, while the sun never sets above them.

These encounters and more do suggest to Melvin that something very strange is going on, and it’s clear that he eventually arrives on the suspicion the audience has been having right from the start – that he’s dead and trapped in some sort of limbo.

Well, I say the audience has the suspicion, but Lucio Fulci’s final movie doesn’t actually try to surprise its viewers with the truth about Melvin’s state. So, instead of wasting time on diffusion and trickery to surprise us with something we’re not going to be surprised about anyway (the true surprise in a film of this sub-genre would be when the protagonist weren’t dead already), Fulci uses the space and time thus afforded to him to create a mood of the strange and a labyrinth out of wide open spaces. While he’s at it, he adds nods to Southern US folklore as well as classic mythology – which quite often seem to be closely related anyway, just differing in their expression of the state of humanity and life – as a backdrop to Melvin’s slow unravelling. It’s also a road movie, obviously, for there’s little we Europeans like to romanticize more than the tale of anyone going on a journey by car through parts of the USA, even when, as it may be the case here, the journey really runs in circles from death to the very same death again.

It will be rather a matter of taste if this works for any given viewer, I believe. There’s a slowness to the proceedings that may prefigure Slow Horror if you’re of a mind to see it that way, but which can also be read as Fulci dragging out a miniscule plot and a somewhat basic idea to feature length come hell or high water. I, not surprising anyone, belong to the former camp, but then, a film of a guy travelling through the US South (well, at least Louisiana) by car and encountering strangeness and eventual doom there is very much the sort of thing I would go for. Really, if Fulci had replaced the Dixieland on the soundtrack with classic country blues, you might have sold me on the idea the film at hand was indeed made for me, personally.

Apart from the film’s pushing of a lot of my personal buttons, I also like Savage’s performance as a not terribly likeable yet also not horrible man finding himself in a situation nothing could ever have prepared him for and understandably losing it piece by piece and bit by bit. Playing a character who is neither a complete prick nor a nice guy isn’t actually that easy or common. In this case, it also shields the whole film from becoming too much of a Twilight Zone episode, the rather cynical Fulci clearly having no truck with the moral(ising) universe perfected by Rod Serling.

His last movie is also yet another example of Fulci as a director who wasn’t actually too bothered with staying in his comfort zone, genre-wise, not going for gore or aggressive, meaningful illogic as in his most-loved films, but ending his filmography restlessly, trying to make a film he hasn’t done before.