buc.ci is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
abucci@bucci.onl
Admin account
@abucci@buc.ci

Search results for tag #useconomy

4 ★ 0 ↺

[?]Anthony » 🌐
@abucci@buc.ci

CNN is reporting "Hiring picked up as 2026 kicked into gear, with the US economy adding a stronger-than-expected 130,000 jobs last month"

If you haven't been following this stuff for long, it might surprise you to know that "adding" 130,000 jobs in a month is a net loss. A jobs report like this would have been taken as a sign of a very poor economy even 15 years ago. The reason is that around 180,000 young people reach legal employment age each month in the US (Contra the admin's confabulations, this is how many US citizens reach employment age, and is not about immigration slowing). Adding 180,000 jobs would be treading water. Adding 130,000 is effectively 50,000 new people without jobs, a net loss by the spirit of this metric. There's also the reality that many of these estimates have been revised down by the BLS after more data came in.

Saying hiring is "picking up" and is "stronger than expected" is effectively saying "it could have been worse! 🤷 ". It's wild to see this positive spin on a very poor report.

It's extraordinarily fishy that the reported unemployment rate is not moving much in spite of these persistent and mounting job losses. I know why this is so please don't @ me a splanation. My point is that it, again, does not reflect the spirit of what this metric is meant to capture. It is wholly perverse now and should not be reported at all, let alone taken as a meaningful indicator.

The US economic numbers, when you push aside all the B.S., are recession-level. There's no "momentum" in the "labor market". There are not "green shoots" or "signs". The economic situation is bad.



    #maine boosted

    [?]US news | The Guardian » 🤖 🌐
    @theguardian_us_news@halo.nu

    AodeRelay boosted

    [?]US news | The Guardian » 🤖 🌐
    @theguardian_us_news@halo.nu

    AodeRelay boosted

    [?]ˈdälfən™🐬 💥 🌊 » 🌐
    @dalfen@mstdn.social

    -

    He acted impetuously based on his own political interest and seemed to have no plan (never mind the fact that he can't do that, at least not in USA 1) — I can't believe it 😂🍟

    /4🧵

      [?]ˈdälfən™🐬 💥 🌊 » 🌐
      @dalfen@mstdn.social

      AodeRelay boosted

      [?]ˈdälfən™🐬 💥 🌊 » 🌐
      @dalfen@mstdn.social

      ~"Trump, who is under pressure to address voter concerns over the cost of living... called for a 1-year cap on credit card interest rates at 10% starting on Jan 20. He did not provide details on how such a ban would be imposed & some industry experts said it would require congressional action."

      /3🧵

      --

      reuters.com/sustainability/boa

        [?]Terry Hunter 🌈⭐✌🏼✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽 » 🌐
        @TerryHunter@universeodon.com

        [?]Terry Hunter 🌈⭐✌🏼✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽 » 🌐
        @TerryHunter@universeodon.com

        [?]Terry Hunter 🌈⭐✌🏼✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽 » 🌐
        @TerryHunter@universeodon.com

        AodeRelay boosted

        [?]Terry Hunter 🌈⭐✌🏼✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽 » 🌐
        @TerryHunter@universeodon.com

        AodeRelay boosted

        [?]Terry Hunter 🌈⭐✌🏼✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽 » 🌐
        @TerryHunter@universeodon.com

        AodeRelay boosted

        [?]ˈdälfən™🐬 💥 🌊 » 🌐
        @dalfen@mstdn.social

        /2

        This is an important reflection of the American economy.

        A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York detailing household debt statistics for Q3 2025. It notes a total household debt of $18.59 trillion, highlighting increases in mortgage, credit card, and student loan balances. An accompanying graph shows that non-housing and household debt is increasing in the United States.

        Alt...A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York detailing household debt statistics for Q3 2025. It notes a total household debt of $18.59 trillion, highlighting increases in mortgage, credit card, and student loan balances. An accompanying graph shows that non-housing and household debt is increasing in the United States.

          AodeRelay boosted

          [?]ˈdälfən™🐬 💥 🌊 » 🌐
          @dalfen@mstdn.social

          JPMorgan Chase Reaches a Deal to Take Over the Apple Credit Card~

          Of interest:

          The largest bank in the is buying over $20 billion of consumer debt AT A SIGNIFICANT DISCOUNT (a rarity).

          "The discount in this deal reflects a high exposure to subprime borrowers and what has been a higher-than-industry-average delinquency rate..."


          ---

          wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorg

          JPMorgan Chase Reaches a Deal to Take Over the Apple Credit Card

After more than a year of negotiations, a deal to take over Goldman Sachs's role in Apple program is expected to be announced soon
Marisa Robertson

Image: The Apple Card released by Apple in partnership with Goldman Sachs. PHOTO: F. MARTIN RAMIN/ WSJ
By AnnaMaria Andriotis and Gina
Heeb
January 7,2026, 3:38 pm EST

WSJ
https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2

Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          Alt...JPMorgan Chase Reaches a Deal to Take Over the Apple Credit Card After more than a year of negotiations, a deal to take over Goldman Sachs's role in Apple program is expected to be announced soon Marisa Robertson Image: The Apple Card released by Apple in partnership with Goldman Sachs. PHOTO: F. MARTIN RAMIN/ WSJ By AnnaMaria Andriotis and Gina Heeb January 7,2026, 3:38 pm EST WSJ https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2 Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          JPMorgan Chase has reached a deal to take over the Apple credit-card program from Goldman Sachs, according to people familiar with the matter.
The biggest bank in the country will become the new issuer of the tech-giant's credit card, one of the largest co-branded programs with some $20 billion in balances, in a deal that has been negotiated for more than a year.
The deal, which is expected to be announced soon baring any more last minute hiccups, will further cement JPMorgan's status as a behemoth in the credit-card sector and marks the final chapter of Goldman's failed experiment in consumer lending.

https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2

Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          Alt...JPMorgan Chase has reached a deal to take over the Apple credit-card program from Goldman Sachs, according to people familiar with the matter. The biggest bank in the country will become the new issuer of the tech-giant's credit card, one of the largest co-branded programs with some $20 billion in balances, in a deal that has been negotiated for more than a year. The deal, which is expected to be announced soon baring any more last minute hiccups, will further cement JPMorgan's status as a behemoth in the credit-card sector and marks the final chapter of Goldman's failed experiment in consumer lending. https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2 Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          The new deal is expected to bring two of the country's most influential companies closer together at a time when payments are increasingly playing out on people's phones, watches and other gadgets. The bank gets a loyal base of Apple customers to whom it can pitch more financial products and Apple gets a partner with a sprawling consumer franchise to help it sell and finance more gadgets.
Goldman Sachs is expected to offload the roughly $20 billion of outstanding card balances at a more than $1 billion discount, according to people familiar with the matter.
With most co-brands, balances sell at a premium of up to 8%, a figure that can run into the double digits for the strongest programs. Discounts are rare and are reserved for the most challenged cases.

https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2

Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          Alt...The new deal is expected to bring two of the country's most influential companies closer together at a time when payments are increasingly playing out on people's phones, watches and other gadgets. The bank gets a loyal base of Apple customers to whom it can pitch more financial products and Apple gets a partner with a sprawling consumer franchise to help it sell and finance more gadgets. Goldman Sachs is expected to offload the roughly $20 billion of outstanding card balances at a more than $1 billion discount, according to people familiar with the matter. With most co-brands, balances sell at a premium of up to 8%, a figure that can run into the double digits for the strongest programs. Discounts are rare and are reserved for the most challenged cases. https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2 Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          The discount in this deal reflects a high exposure to subprime borrowers and what has been a higher-than-industry-average delinquency rate, creating the potential for significant losses on the outstanding balances. Concerns about those losses slowed the deal talks and contributed to hesitation from JPMor-gan and other banks that looked at pursuing a deal, The Wall Street Journal earlier reported.
JPMorgan will issue Apple credit cards for both new and existing cardholders, the people said. The transition from Goldman, as is the case with most card deals, will take time.

https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2

Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

          Alt...The discount in this deal reflects a high exposure to subprime borrowers and what has been a higher-than-industry-average delinquency rate, creating the potential for significant losses on the outstanding balances. Concerns about those losses slowed the deal talks and contributed to hesitation from JPMor-gan and other banks that looked at pursuing a deal, The Wall Street Journal earlier reported. JPMorgan will issue Apple credit cards for both new and existing cardholders, the people said. The transition from Goldman, as is the case with most card deals, will take time. https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorgan-chase-reaches-a-deal-to-take-over-the-apple-credit-card-4e214fb2 Accessed: 7 January 2026 at 1550 PST

            AodeRelay boosted

            [?]R. Scott (i47i) :freebsd_logo: » 🌐
            @i47i@hachyderm.io

            Donald Trump Admits Voters Are Struggling: 'Take a While' To See My Economy

            Trump says voters are “struggling” but insists “his economy” is strong. Europeans have seen this movie before.

            What Americans are living through isn’t prosperity that hasn’t arrived yet — it’s AUSTERITY, disguised as “tariffs”.

            In Europe they remember Greece under the Troika: living costs rising, wages squeezed, public pain framed as unavoidable “reform”, while banks and large corporates were protected. Different language, same outcome.

            Tariffs are not paid by China. They are paid by consumers. Economists are clear: tariffs function as regressive taxes, hitting lower-income households hardest. This is austerity without the label - and without honesty.

            After the 2008 Lehman collapse, losses were socialised, “too big to fail” was rewarded, and the bill was deferred. Fifteen years later, the bill has come due.

            Corporate welfare at the top.

            Austerity for everyone else.

            Tariffs are taxes, and highly inefficient ones
            forbes.com/sites/andrewleahey/

            Tariffs hurt lower-income Americans more than the wealthy
            cnbc.com/2025/04/25/trump-tari

            Anadolu Agency on Greece & Troika austerity (historical parallel)
            aa.com.tr/en/economy/greek-fm-

            This isn’t industrial policy. It’s one of the largest hidden tax grabs in modern U.S. history.

            Americans have been fooled again.






            ibtimes.co.uk/donald-trump-adm

              AodeRelay boosted

              [?]Ev Delen » 🌐
              @evdelen@mstdn.ca

              This has to be one of the simplest and most frank explanations of the post-WWII World geopolitical and economic order that I've ever seen or read.

              It's embedded within a doc about the Ride and Fall of the American Motor Industry but it could be it's own must-see video in and of itself.

              youtu.be/TO-_EmYY6Y8?t=1870&si

              TL;DW: Every time the globe comes to an economic consensus, which the US organized and which made them the centre of, the US managed to squander it then change the rules, all in the pursuit of maintaining the fiction of cheap, limitless energy (dead-dinosaurs) in order to maximize profits.

                AodeRelay boosted

                [?]jilleduffy » 🌐
                @jilleduffy@mastodon.social

                AI stocks waver as ‘Big Short’ investor bets against Palantir, Nvidia

                That was from the Washington Post late last night (Tues Nov 4) Eastern time.

                This morning (US time), the update is the bet was $1.1 billion

                Gift article
                wapo.st/3WEdZhL

                  AodeRelay boosted

                  [?]Flipboard News Desk » 🌐
                  @NewsDesk@flipboard.social

                  The U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and his committee usually make decisions about monetary policy based on a wealth of information. But when they meet tomorrow, they won't have access to stats like monthly employment and detailed inflation data because of the federal shutdown. Jason Reed, a professor of finance, writes for @TheConversationUS about what information the Fed will use to set interest rates, and where the U.S. economy might be heading.

                  flip.it/gsuTdP

                    3 ★ 1 ↺
                    Acin ☆ boosted

                    [?]Anthony » 🌐
                    @abucci@buc.ci

                    Just a reminder that Google is an illegal monopolist, having lost three distinct antitrust cases.

                    It looks likely that Google will be treated the way Microsoft was in their famous antitrust loss in the late 1990s, and not be broken up in any significant way. Google absolutely should be broken up, just like AT&T and Standard Oil (and countless other large US monopolists) were before it. Google's wealth and power derives from illegal behavior; this is not in question anymore. Why should they be permitted to keep what courts have decided they stole? 100 years of antitrust law and precedent says that it should not be permitted to keep the spoils of its illegal behavior.

                    It sounds to me like the hesitation to break up Google is largely ideological on the part of the judges and lawyers involved. The failure to break up Microsoft after its antitrust loss is arguably one of the main reasons the US economy is such a monopolized, consolidated mess today, and why so many things are "enshittifying". Breaking up Google and changing that pattern would obviously not cure all ills, but it'd almost surely make a number of things in the economy better for a whole lot of people.

                    In any case, one thing we can all do is look at Google as a bad actor, a law-breaking entity whose power is illegitimate.

                    https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/why-is-google-still-in-one-piece


                      0 ★ 3 ↺

                      [?]Anthony » 🌐
                      @abucci@buc.ci

                      Looks like Apollo is calling a recession for Summer 2025. The Trump crew is already trying to blame Biden, but that's 100% horseshit. From what I gather this is unlikely to be reversible so brace yourself in whichever ways you can. There are suggestions this one may be worse than 2008.

                      https://www.apolloacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/042625-ConsumerandFirms_v2.pdf (see page 4 for a summary of the timeline + expectation)


                        2 ★ 0 ↺

                        [?]Anthony » 🌐
                        @abucci@buc.ci

                        It's also worth remembering that largely because of dysfunction and monopolization in the agriculture sector, the US became a persistent net importer of agricultural products in 2023, worsening the overall trade deficit. This even as the US literally has the most arable land in the world, more than enough to grow food for everyone here and export a bunch after. Which is what we used to do (see this post for instance). This report on agriculture industry monopolization titled “Kings Over the Necessaries of Life”: Monopolization and the Elimination of Competition in America’s Agriculture System is damning.

                        I don't believe the administration is being sincere when it decries international trade imbalances. There are some simple, obvious actions it could be taking right at home that would be wildly popular yet do not seem to merit mention.


                          5 ★ 2 ↺

                          [?]Anthony » 🌐
                          @abucci@buc.ci

                          In all the talk of US trade deficits forcing Trump et al. to erect tariff barriers to "rebalance trade", we've lost or ignored the fact that the US has an enormous digital trade surplus. See, for instance, this paper Estimating digital product trade through corporate revenue data. The US's main conventional export is currently petroleum, but it exports over twice as much in digital advertising. The US's overall "digital exports" are larger than the total exports of France, which is the world's 7th leading exporter. However, these numbers are not typically included in reports about trade deficits or surpluses.


                            3 ★ 1 ↺

                            [?]Anthony » 🌐
                            @abucci@buc.ci

                            I hope there are journalists digging into who sold and who bought stocks and cryptocurrencies, which ones and when, leading up to Apr 2 and in the next few weeks.

                            The low-effort generative AI looking tariff rates is a tell. The fact bitcoin moved the same way as US stock indices has a bad smell about it too.


                              8 ★ 5 ↺

                              [?]Anthony » 🌐
                              @abucci@buc.ci

                              I think it's wild that cryptocurrencies are also crashing along with the US stock market. I mean, I feel like they're doomed to crash generally but there legitimately seemed to be enthusiasm in that industry that Trump would make the line go up.