buc.ci is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Admin email
abucci@bucci.onl
Admin account
@abucci@buc.ci

Search results for tag #monopoly

AodeRelay boosted

[?]Jon Snow » 🌐
@jonsnow@mastodon.online

AodeRelay boosted

[?]Jon Snow » 🌐
@jonsnow@mastodon.online

To distribute an Android app outside Google Play, starting September 2026, developers will need to register with Google, submit government ID, and pay a $25 fee. Even if they're using F-Droid or the Amazon Appstore, stores Google doesn't own or operate. Privacy groups are pushing back.

reclaimthenet.org/open-letter-

    AodeRelay boosted

    [?]Michael Fenichel » 🌐
    @drmike@mastodon.social

    ⚠️

    A PSA/ Meme describing the potential purchase of Warner Bros./media  (w/CNN)

Image of an upside-down ("in distress") American Flag.

Text:

One family is about to control CBS,
CNN, HBO, and TikTok.

They’ll buy Warner Brothers with
$24 billion in money from the
Saudis, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi.

To win over Trump, they canceled
Colbert, blocked a segment on
CECOT, and blocked a James
Talarico interview.

America now has state-
compromised media. This is fascism.
Support independent media. Block
this rotten deal.

/ WOMEN FORWARD

    Alt...A PSA/ Meme describing the potential purchase of Warner Bros./media (w/CNN) Image of an upside-down ("in distress") American Flag. Text: One family is about to control CBS, CNN, HBO, and TikTok. They’ll buy Warner Brothers with $24 billion in money from the Saudis, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi. To win over Trump, they canceled Colbert, blocked a segment on CECOT, and blocked a James Talarico interview. America now has state- compromised media. This is fascism. Support independent media. Block this rotten deal. / WOMEN FORWARD

      [?]Radio_Azureus » 🌐
      @Radio_Azureus@ioc.exchange

      My sentiments exactly

      Monopolies need to be shattered

      @kkarhan

        AodeRelay boosted

        [?]Radio_Azureus » 🌐
        @Radio_Azureus@ioc.exchange

        RAM CXMT

        RAM factory emerged

        • Location China
        • Products
        • DDR4
        • DDR5
        • LPDDR4
        • LPDDR5

        DDR5 RAM can be found for as little as USD138 (unverified source!)

        cxmt.com/en/

          AodeRelay boosted

          [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
          @kkarhan@infosec.space

          @botvolution nodds in agreement

          And that is a huge problem!

          • I know that.from experience with which against my protestations against it, was allowed to buy up and has comitted itself to of my access to the point that I feel required to publicly petition @EUCommission & @BNetzA to regulate them as akin to but also not only demand my money back until they unfuck their mess, but even consider procuring a different access (which as a tennant means worse xDSL at worse speeds and prices!)

            AodeRelay boosted

            [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
            @kkarhan@infosec.space

            @xaetacore lets be honest: being a is not good, actually…

              AodeRelay boosted

              [?]Richard W. Woodley ELBOWS UP 🇨🇦🌹🚴‍♂️📷 🗺️ » 🌐
              @the5thColumnist@mstdn.ca

              Remember when we believed was about because that is what they taught us in school when the truth was they key to sucess in capitalism is .

              The game inventors knew though and that is why they did not call their game about capitalism Competition.

                [?]Pauline von Hellermann » 🌐
                @pvonhellermannn@mastodon.green

                🧵64/n The article made me think once again about Monopoly, and how perfectly it captures what the world is like. Originally called “the Landlord Game”, it was invented in 1903 by left-wing feminist Lizzie Magie who wanted to expose how rentier capitalism works through a game. She more than succeeded but - this being capitalist US - never got the credit for it. Interesting piece about it all here.

                theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2

                Screenshot of top of article

Годонон
MONA
МОНОРОС +
OPOLY
Monopoly
• This article is more than 10 years old
The secret history of
Monopoly: the capitalist
board game's leftwing
origins
In 1903, a leftwing feminist called Lizzy Magie
patented the board game that we now know as
Monopoly - but she never gets the credit. Now a
new book aims to put that right

                Alt...Screenshot of top of article Годонон MONA МОНОРОС + OPOLY Monopoly • This article is more than 10 years old The secret history of Monopoly: the capitalist board game's leftwing origins In 1903, a leftwing feminist called Lizzy Magie patented the board game that we now know as Monopoly - but she never gets the credit. Now a new book aims to put that right

                  AodeRelay boosted

                  [?]C. » 🌐
                  @cazabon@mindly.social

                  In the last week or so, 's CEO Satya Nadella announced that they were going to pull back from doing new feature work for for a bit, and focus on bug fixes and other quality-of-life improvements for users and administrators. Windows' already shaky reputation has taken a beating over the last year as it seems that every monthly rollup , and many out-of-band , introduce new problems at the same rate as they fix previous ones.

                  Is this giving you deja vu? It should. Remember a couple or three years ago, when the same guy announced that Microsoft was going to focus on security? They were in the middle of a long spell of brutal security holes found in all their products. Remember how they told their "If you have to choose between doing a feature and doing security, choose security"?

                  Remember how you never heard about that initiative again?

                  It's the same thing here. garbage in service of a narrative that no, Windows' horrible security, usability, and aren't actually that bad, so that MS can focus on their core competencies of buzzword promotion, stock market analyst manipulation, and monopoly abuse.

                  Perhaps someone in Microsoft management actually believes these refocusing efforts are genuine - but if you don't change the incentives, they won't actually take hold.

                    AodeRelay boosted

                    [?]Liam 🏳️‍🌈 » 🌐
                    @liam@mastodon.gruezi.net

                    What's old is new again... Funny how all the parts of Ma Bell slowly but surely make their way back... 🤔

                    My account was was originally under Qwest, then CenturyLink, then Quantum Fiber, now Quantum Fiber from AT&T.

                    A screenshot of an email from Quantum Fiber (now with a From AT&T tag under the logo)

Same great service and new possibilities

Hi Liam,

Quantum Fiver is now part of the AT&T family.
For you, this means the same reliable connection you've come to expect and enjoy with the potential for much more. That's the combined power of AT&T and Quantum Fiber.

                    Alt...A screenshot of an email from Quantum Fiber (now with a From AT&T tag under the logo) Same great service and new possibilities Hi Liam, Quantum Fiver is now part of the AT&T family. For you, this means the same reliable connection you've come to expect and enjoy with the potential for much more. That's the combined power of AT&T and Quantum Fiber.

                      AodeRelay boosted

                      [?]David » 🌐
                      @deFractal@infosec.exchange

                      @marcoxa @thedarktangent @pluralistic Pretty much, but now the broligarchs are trying to force it on everyone. They really don't like taking "no" for an answer.

                      Indeed, that one thing—categorical unwillingness to respect others' refusal of consent—is the defining characteristic in common to every one of them. Despite how some viewers understandably took offence, Louis Rossmann characterized the you'll-own-nothing CEOs' mentality exactly correctly.

                      No wonder they bought the US government for the rapist-in-chief.

                        AodeRelay boosted

                        [?]Pseudonymous :antiverified: » 🌐
                        @VictimOfSimony@infosec.exchange

                        If we're being honest this should probably be the biggest news story today. We already knew all the terrible things the media is focusing on today, but this could be a game-changer.
                        :blobfistbumpL: :blobcatgooglyshrug: :blobcatpawtongueright:

                        thewrap.com/industry-news/busi

                          AodeRelay boosted

                          [?]derandiefrischeluftmuss » 🌐
                          @OhbaFrank@sueden.social

                          AodeRelay boosted

                          [?]Kevin Karhan :verified: » 🌐
                          @kkarhan@infosec.space

                          @dotmeow @da5nsy granted, does also resolve the , and in fact they actually went out of their way to cancel a comflicthig in their rootzone...

                          • The problem is the concentration at ICANN and the ones that tried to fight that legally - - seem to have gone bankrupt on that endeavour...

                          Obviously you'd not do a campaign and try to raise $$$$$$$ in funds if you didn't want to get included in ICANNs rootzone, which paywall the hell out of gTLD applications...

                            AodeRelay boosted

                            [?]C. » 🌐
                            @cazabon@mindly.social

                            I've been thinking about this for some years. As others have noted, the problem is that the market is accustomed to browsers being "free", ever since illegally leveraged their OS to destroy by driving their income to (essentially) zero.

                            I started thinking about it in terms of how I support various creators for small amounts with monthly . Could you fund reasonable and of purely based on low-cost subs from users? Bigger donations from companies or billionaires would be welcome, but it would need to be sustainable on its own first.

                            Development wouldn't have to be as expensive as what does (which is mostly counter-productive anyway...).

                            There are still millions of people - more than a hundred million, apparently - who use Firefox, and many of those are more knowledgeable about and involved with open-source . They're more likely to appreciate that funding development is the key to keeping Firefox relevant, and keeping the "AI" / / / out of the .

                            Some people are starting to pay a few bucks a month just for a search engine subscription. Why not pay for your browser? For many people, it's the software they use more than everything else put together. For some people, it's the only software they ever use.

                            I'd pay $2 a month to support my browser, if it kept it safe from <handwave> all that </handwave>.

                            2/x

                              AodeRelay boosted

                              [?]Kim Perales » 🌐
                              @KimPerales@toad.social

                              "A secret algorithm helped meat giants allegedly collude to raise your prices and slash workers’ wages. According to multiple lawsuits,🚨Agri Stats let major meat processors coordinate pricing and wage decisions behind closed doors.

                              The stakes:🚨$billions in food costs, stagnant worker pay, and an industry operating like a cartel."

                              levernews.com/the-secret-algor

                                AodeRelay boosted

                                [?]Niklas Pivic » 🌐
                                @pivic@kolektiva.social

                                What happens if Netflix are allowed to buy Warner Bros.

                                  AodeRelay boosted

                                  [?]Steven Saus [he/him] » 🌐
                                  @StevenSaus@faithcollapsing.com

                                  uspol,socialmedia [SENSITIVE CONTENT]

                                  (18 Nov) Meta wins monopoly trial, convinces judge that social networking is dead

                                  People are &ldquo;bored&rdquo; by their friends&rsquo; content, judge ruled, siding with Meta.

                                  s.faithcollapsing.com/xb4bc

                                  -law -trade-commission

                                  An image for decorative purposes automatically pulled from the post.

                                  Alt...An image for decorative purposes automatically pulled from the post.

                                    AodeRelay boosted

                                    [?]Wulfy—Speaker to the machines » 🌐
                                    @n_dimension@infosec.exchange

                                    @robcinos

                                    There were two sets of rules for Monopoly.

                                    One for capitalism
                                    One of socialism

                                    Once Parker Bros(?) bought the game, they only kept the capitalism, which was meant to illustrate how bad it is when only one player cleans up.

                                      3 ★ 1 ↺
                                      Chewie boosted

                                      [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                      @abucci@buc.ci

                                      Regarding the last boost: Google has been found to be an illegal monopoly multiple times, and so far no judge has had the courage to impose a significant enough penalty that Google actually changes its ways. Its monopoly behavior is frequent, obvious, and damaging.

                                      Anyway, check your Google Drive, if you use that: go to drive, then click the gear. Choose Settings -> Manage Apps, and make sure "Use by default" is checked OFF for everything you don't like, especially Gemini (Google's AI that they're pushing on everyone). This was added and turned on by default for most people, it seems. It also looks like Google is training their AI on every document you open; people report very slow load times when this setting is on, remedied by turning it off.


                                        4 ★ 2 ↺
                                        emenel boosted

                                        [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                        @abucci@buc.ci

                                        Judge Mehta's decision in the Google antitrust case is so bad I think he should be prevented from working in the law in any capacity. He just threw off his clear responsibilities and let an illegal monopoly maintain its illegal monopoly and continue harming everyone, based on "reasoning" that a child could debunk. It's embarrassing, it's cowardly, it's self-contradictory, it's lawless, it violates precedent, and it will harm countless people and businesses in the tech sector. A staggering achievement really. It even violates Supreme Court precedent, which dictates that judges must apply remedies that end illegal monopolies (and, I believe, confiscate the illegal gains, though I am less clear on whether that's Supreme Court precedent).

                                        Here's an except from a post on Matt Stoller's BIG newsletter, which is very good on the subject of antitrust:

                                        The last meaningful reference point for an antitrust remedy is the Microsoft case. In that one, the break-up was overturned, and a weak interoperability mandate was imposed. But the real penalty to Microsoft was embarrassment and fear within the executive suite; no longer would the company crush its rivals, from then on, lawyers would cautiously oversee product design. That’s not ideal, Microsoft should have just been broken up and set free to compete. But a chastened leadership did have the effect of not killing the next generation of companies, who ended up creating Web 2.0. That’s deterrence, which is one goal of antitrust remedies.

                                        This remedy, by contrast, is obviously going to fail. And the main reason is that, unlike Microsoft, Google’s leadership is utterly unchastened. Google CEO Sundar Pichai and chief legal officer Kent Walker will get bonuses for what they did. They see this conflict as one in which they fought bitterly, and kept at it, and shredded documents, and the result was… victory. They will have no compunction continuing to engage in unlawful behavior. After all, what’s the worst that could happen? Would a rival or the government really go before a weak judge who doesn’t want conflict, and convince him to act? I don’t think so. In other words, this decision isn’t just bad, it’s virtually a statement that crime pays.

                                        (emphasis mine)

                                        Stoller recently wrote a post titled "Why Is Google Still in One Piece? The Terminating a Monopoly Problem" with the subtitle: "Google has lost three separate antitrust cases, and more are on the way. Why does this company still exist in one piece? It shouldn't, but we're still dealing with the hangover of the 1990s."

                                        The problems with the tech sector go all the way to the tippy top.


                                          3 ★ 1 ↺
                                          Acin ☆ boosted

                                          [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                          @abucci@buc.ci

                                          Just a reminder that Google is an illegal monopolist, having lost three distinct antitrust cases.

                                          It looks likely that Google will be treated the way Microsoft was in their famous antitrust loss in the late 1990s, and not be broken up in any significant way. Google absolutely should be broken up, just like AT&T and Standard Oil (and countless other large US monopolists) were before it. Google's wealth and power derives from illegal behavior; this is not in question anymore. Why should they be permitted to keep what courts have decided they stole? 100 years of antitrust law and precedent says that it should not be permitted to keep the spoils of its illegal behavior.

                                          It sounds to me like the hesitation to break up Google is largely ideological on the part of the judges and lawyers involved. The failure to break up Microsoft after its antitrust loss is arguably one of the main reasons the US economy is such a monopolized, consolidated mess today, and why so many things are "enshittifying". Breaking up Google and changing that pattern would obviously not cure all ills, but it'd almost surely make a number of things in the economy better for a whole lot of people.

                                          In any case, one thing we can all do is look at Google as a bad actor, a law-breaking entity whose power is illegitimate.

                                          https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/why-is-google-still-in-one-piece


                                            1 ★ 0 ↺

                                            [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                            @abucci@buc.ci

                                            A federal judge ruled that Google violated US antitrust law by maintaining a monopoly in the search and advertising markets.
                                            From Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/5/24155520/judge-rules-on-us-doj-v-google-antitrust-search-suit

                                            It's been a long time coming.


                                              3 ★ 3 ↺

                                              [?]Anthony » 🌐
                                              @abucci@buc.ci

                                              Google is now a bona fide illegal monopolist
                                              From https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-2-trillion-secret-trial-against

                                              Always worth remembering this, as another (the bigger) antitrust case against Google is in closing arguments today.

                                              Google is trying to get its Gemini AI into Apple's next iPhone update. This industry seems to think it's above the law and even above what consumers want from them. It's long past time these giant companies be broken up.