The cinema of Brian DePalma is a curious one. He has made a career out of taking the formulas and motifs of other filmmakers and somehow created an art-form and "auteurism" all his own. DePalma has stepped away from his Hitchcock obsession in the past twenty years and made a string of films most people would largely consider to be failures; The Untouchables in 1987 was a wild success, and only Femme Fatale, in my opinion, has lived up to DePalma's potential since then. With The Black Dahlia, we have DePalma noir, a highly stylized world that never seems to take itself seriously. The background of the film tackles the infamous Black Dahlia murder, in which a young Hollywood starlet was found artfully dismembered in the 1940s, never to be solved. I say "background" because, despite the title of the film, you find yourself wondering at points what the film is really about. Despite the lofty ambition (and the general excitement on my part about a possible return to form for DePalma), The Black Dahlia certainly is not what it should have been. Instead, it's a messy, silly, confused almost-disaster, redeemed by small moments that can never make up for the rest.
15 September 2006
Dying Legends
The cinema of Brian DePalma is a curious one. He has made a career out of taking the formulas and motifs of other filmmakers and somehow created an art-form and "auteurism" all his own. DePalma has stepped away from his Hitchcock obsession in the past twenty years and made a string of films most people would largely consider to be failures; The Untouchables in 1987 was a wild success, and only Femme Fatale, in my opinion, has lived up to DePalma's potential since then. With The Black Dahlia, we have DePalma noir, a highly stylized world that never seems to take itself seriously. The background of the film tackles the infamous Black Dahlia murder, in which a young Hollywood starlet was found artfully dismembered in the 1940s, never to be solved. I say "background" because, despite the title of the film, you find yourself wondering at points what the film is really about. Despite the lofty ambition (and the general excitement on my part about a possible return to form for DePalma), The Black Dahlia certainly is not what it should have been. Instead, it's a messy, silly, confused almost-disaster, redeemed by small moments that can never make up for the rest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I'd argue that CARLITO is maybe his best Hollywood film of the 90s, with FEMME being his best auteur film.
The reviews I've read of DAHLIA are all similar to yours, but I'm hoping I'll disagree. I'll let you know in a few days.
I saw this film last night, and I'm curious as how you can annoint FEMME with it's camp and misfired acting, but then reject DAHLIA for the same reasons? To me, this film was awesomely disturbing and playfully generic. The opening of that crane shot you spole of (with the woman running and screaming), the modern-art painting (and the casting of Bill Finley), the music over the very final shot, the stag film set shown three different times, and the audition film's humiliations, these are a few examples of why De Palms is still on top of his game.
I'm only speaking for myself here, but as much as I disliked the movie, I near came when I heard Scarlett described as a big-titted Dakota cunt.
I do agree with the statement of "Carlito's Way" being DePalma's shining star from the 90s. It's one of my favorite scripts of all time, and it's executed so perfectly that I wish "Scarface" didn't exist so that this would get all the love and praise people unfairly pour on "Scarface." I believe they do so because it's about 3 hours long and because there's a plethora of cocaine. The only thing that feels like DePalma in "Scarface" is the chainsaw. Everything else is simply ho-hum. What was my point again? Oh! Joe, take "Carlito" home.
Post a Comment