Showing posts with label Vin Diesel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vin Diesel. Show all posts

18 June 2020

First Impressions: Bloodshot

Hell yeah I saw Bloodshot (2020). In the Age of COVID-19 the Drive-In movie theater is king! I haven't been to a drive-in in nearly 25 years. It's not that great, I sit in my car all the time. But it was fun to mix things up and find a way...to survive.

B
"Die, Robot Legs!"
loodshot
 features Vin Diesel playing himself in a clear vanity project that also somehow exists as a strong contender for the perfect Vin Diesel vehicle. If you actually want to watch this thing, I suggest just watching it - the premise is actually pretty clever and the trailer completely gives away every card it has. It was very disappointing. In fact, stop reading this review and watch it, because otherwise it'll be super ruined for you. Or not, whatever, it's not like The Sixth Sense (1999) or something.

The movie opens with Vin Diesel in some anonymous war torn country, who fights his way to the big bad villain, who kills his boo and then Diesel himself. He wakes up as part of some scientific experiment, infused with nano-technology that can heal any wound instantly as well as giving him super strength and complete Internet access! Diesel sneaks out and seeks revenge, an unstoppable killing machine who decimates the villain and secures vengeance.

At this point we're like 40 minutes in, so more shit has to happen, right? Well, as it turns out, Diesel is totally being Memento'd by (ironically) Guy Pierce. Guy Pearce fabricates memories of the killing in Diesel's programmable corpse and then points him in the direction of whoever he wants killed. The movie actually plays with a lot of tropes this way. His girlfriend, at first seeming like an egregious example of a fridge girl is actually completely fine, has moved on, has a new husband and child, and hasn't actually seen Diesel in five years. His disobeying orders and striking out on his own is all a farce designed exactly as Guy Pearce wants it. All his rage and catharsis is artificial bullshit. It's actually kind of amazing.

You wonder if Diesel was aware of any of this. He eventually becomes sort of a side character in his own story. He's clearly a tool for every other character, a bull pointed in whatever direction they want to destroy. He ghosts is knocked out constantly. Is it some commentary on these unstoppable superheroes or action heroes who feel so justified in their righteous revenge? It's all a ploy. I'm not sure if the movie is that smart, because yes, there are quite a few problems with this, perhaps undercut the most because Diesel's performance and dedication to the "Hero's Journey" is incredibly sincere.

You didn't always get that with Diesel. Despite appearing like a mindless violent beefcake, I always liked when he slowed things down like showed how scared he is at the end of xXx (2003) or voicing The Iron Giant (1999). I think he's trying too hard to prove himself these days and trying desperately to show how tough he is after The Rock called him out for being soft. Anyway, even though this was the perfect movie to show some real growth, he bungles it by being the most insane headstrong unstoppable killer ever.

Part of that obviously works in the film's favor. Guy Pearce even comments constantly about how driven Diesel is, and how he just thinks he's in a video game. There is a lot of that. Diesel basically completes mission after mission and works his way up to the final boss. A lot of this is meta, but it is sincere enough to work, at least in some ironic sense. As you can tell, this movie actually really tripped me up. It's not obvious with its meta-commentary like The LEGO Movie (2014) or something, but there's a lot there. For a bit it tries to comment but also eat its own cake, and when it slides too much in that direction, it fails.

Now for all the crap that makes no sense. Upon thinking about the premise at all, why did Guy Pearce have to do any of this? He has the nano-technology to create an unstoppable killing machine. Why does he need to trick Vin Diesel into killing all these people? Why doesn't he just hire someone and then make them to it? This idea is less crazy when you realize that he also has a team of three technologically advanced cyborg killers working for him that actually just do that.

One, in particular, is some guy with robot legs. Robot Legs hates Vin Diesel for absolutely no reason. He absolutely haaaaates Diesel. Who the hell knows why. The best I could guess is that they invest all this energy into making him a super-healing unstoppable killer, when he would probably just do it for free. Maybe it's the fact that one girl got a super breathing apparatus (by the way, I'm convinced this movie doesn't understand how lungs work), and another blind soldier got all these drone cameras to control. Robot Legs just got the ability to parkour. He doesn't actually have a purpose in this film outside of plot, and by that I mean within his own organization.

There's also not really a major world-ending plot or anything. Guy Pearce is just kind of a jerk. Diesel's arc boils down to getting revenge on someone who brainwashed him into thinking he needs to get revenge on that person's enemies. There's nothing actually heroic about anything. That presents another level of meta-irony, which again, Diesel seems to play with sincerity. It works when you're reading the movie as this basic parody of action films, but there really are too many slow motion, music swelling scenes of pure heroism to defend this stance.

So, Diesel is unstoppable, can heal from any injury, and hack into the top government satellites anywhere in the world, but he can overheat or something? It's never quite clear. His chest gets red and eyes get bloodshot (the only way this title makes sense I guess?), which means he's close to danger! But nothing really happens. He overclocks at one point and then just kind of wakes up in the next scene. It's not all that dramatic. Again, is this a commentary on bulletproof, deathproof action heroes? Or just bad writing? I've put way too much thought into Bloodshot over the past few weeks.

On that note, since the ostensible love interest gets all worried when he overclocks, we should talk about the girl in the movie, because it's really weird. Diesel has his wife (or girlfriend?) memories that drive all his revenge, but when that's undercut it seems like he's going to hook up with the Breathing Hole Girl. She has some implant on her chest that lets her breathe in poison gas or underwater. Maybe it's just how she's presented - as a total sex ball honeypot, but it seems like she's going to help Diesel heal from the pain of losing his girlfriend-wife. But that never happens, and they end platonically.

Not to seem like I'm beating a dead Charger, but AGAIN - is this on purpose? Subverting our expectations that the action hero hooks up with the sultry breath hole vixen? I don't know what's going on. It's maybe progressive, she has her own dynamic and agency and is only kidnapped once. It sort of skirts problematic treatment, but the movie seems reluctant that they hook up while presenting them as totally hot for each other.

Lastly we have the black friend, Lamorne Morris who does a pretty good job as the renegade hacker person who reboots the Diesel into serving justice. He inexplicably speaks in a thick English accent, which I could only think of Don Cheadle in Ocean's 11 (2001) as precedent? Like, why is this a thing? I just don't know what's going on this film.

In the end I actually dug Bloodshot a lot. It's certifiably dumb, but a pretty fun time that pokes holes in action tropes, purposeful or not. I think it was on purpose, but it's not witty enough to take advantage of them, and Diesel, to his credit, is so sincere in his performance that it simultaneously enforces and undercuts the core theme. Just watch this movie, it's pretty wild.

lamorne morris accent

16 December 2017

2017 Reflection: The Crap We Was

It's a long mirror to look back in and understand our anticipation of lots of media that dropped in 2017. I tried really hard to not set myself up for disappointment this year. I was mostly pleasantly surprised. This was an impressive year, all things told. It's important to be really refined about what we're looking for, and for all the complaining about the movies being dead or Peak TV uh...peaking, we had some good shit. Let's review the shit that we were pumped up for a year ago.

Taboo (01/10)

I went back and forth on Taboo a lot. In the end I liked it. It was a brutal look at the life of Tom Hardy in the early 19th-Century, full of some insane twists and turns that made for some addictive watching. I continuously got the impression that they were trying hard to be an admittedly scaled back Game of Thrones set in 1814 London. It's full of different parties trying to play against each other and manipulate a grand game of war, ships, slaves, and whore murder. It ended a bit softer than it should have and was never as good as it tried to be, but the acting, impressive production design, and incest are always welcome.

Run the Jewels 3 (01/17)

This dropped in December as I was writing this preview, so dammit, Killer Mike. 3 wasn't as good as 2, but grew on me as the year went on, culminating in "Legend Has It" featured in that stellar Black Panther trailer. I'm surprised they had commercial success with their insanely literate politically charged hip hop at all, but they proved again they're some of the best in the game.

xXx: The Return of Xander Cage (01/20)

Hahahaa, alright, so there was a pretty specific way this could go. I'm further confounded about the Diesel after this - he is so clearly not in on the joke of his own ridiculousness. It actually had a decent premise, too. This movie was pretty fucking bad, but Ruby Rose was amazing in it. This did not turn into the Fast franchise nobody but Diesel wanted, but that's for everyone's benefit.

Legion (02/08) - FX
Just give him some McDonalds and be done with it


Legion was bonkers and continuously mind-blowing, often very literally. It changed the game for what Aubrey Plaza can do, made a star out of Rachel Keller, and showcased Dan Stevens as so much more than the arbitrary stand-in actor for Beauty and the Beast (2017). That dance scene, man. This leaves all those Marvel Netflix series in the dust by not being remotely concerned with superhero antics. Instead they focus on misuse of powers, mostly through lack of understanding, fear and self-preservation, and personal gain. Ironically, a series focused on mutants is the most human series yet.

John Wick: Chapter Two (02/10)

The most difficult uphill battle was that this was no longer coming by surprise. John Wick (2014) changed the game and a second chapter was neither asked for nor necessary. Yeah, we're glad we got it. From throwing the action to a car, the random mean streets of New York, and then a somehow even more impossibly bleak ending, Chapter Two delivered more action sequences that raised the bar for all other films to follow. We just can't watch sub-par action anymore.

The LEGO Batman Movie (02/10)

I enjoyed this a lot, but am generally less of a fan than I should be. It's an absolute love letter to superhero, particularly Batman tropes and history, which is all sorts of amazing, but there was a moment there when the metanarrative didn't add up with the actual narrative, and the "Joker in love with Batman" subplot (or...main plot?) felt inauthentic. Cramming in every other property that Warner Bros owns seemed forced and resolved far too quickly for how good this could have been. In its defense, it IS probably the funniest film of 2017 and Will Arnett continues to be a revelation in this role.

A Cure for Wellness (02/17)

Kind of like LEGO Batman this film was full of good, interesting ideas that never seemed to go anywhere. Yes, let's compare A Cure for Wellness to LEGO Batman... Dane DeHaan is serviceable enough, but the conspiracy pay-off isn't great. I don't know why we needed a big conspiracy at all. This movie worked fine as a meditation on creepy wellness sanitariums, which totally actually exist somehow and are totally manipulative pseudo-science. There's 3/4 of a good movie in here.

Logan (03/03)

Breathtaking? Amazing? Uncanny. Logan delivered on everything it tried to be and more. In an age of bigger and badder crashing and smashing superhero films, Hugh, Pat, and James found a way around all that. I still hate the doppelganger crap, and wanted Mr. Sinister, but this is fine. I guess. There's enough incredible scenes of tragic superhero downtime and growth, actual fucking growth to make this a great film.

The Fate of the Furious (04/14)

I'm sorry. I'm off Diesel. I promise. That Statham baby fight, tho. And that Statham / Rock prison escape. And the Rock throwing a torpedo into a submarine. There was lots of madness here, but an empty movie with a wasted premise. The Last Knight (2017) wins this year's battle of "Heroes Becoming Traitors" movie twists.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (05/05)

Until my dying day I'll tout this over the original and over most of what else dropped in the blockbuster realm this year. I was hesitant to throw this up here because I'm always disappointed, but this worked in every way. Well, sure the middle of the film just chilling on Ego was a little flat, but damn they rode their characters so true, threw in a random Stallone, and gave us more feels for Yondu than any superhero character ever. How about that?

Dunkirk (07/21)
Don't forget your suntan lotion!


Here's another film that possibly surpassed expectations. We all know that Chris Nolan has to really try to make an outright SHITTY movie (I listed Following [1998] and Batman Begins [2005] among his worst. How is that even possible), but it was great to see that Dunkirk easily ranked among his best ever. It's kind of like when Pixar spits out an Inside Out (2015) that suddenly stand with anything they've ever done. This somehow plays with time more than any film he's done, despite cranking out two huge films that explicitly deal with some form of time travel. It's a wonder of editing, storytelling, and true drama.

Blade Runner 2049 (10/06)

There are a few weeks left of this year to crank out a few more choice films, but right now 2049 is at the top of my list. I don't think I've ever had a #1 most anticipated film actually come out as best of the year. I feel so validated. We'll get into this more when the time comes.

Now, we had a few mini-anticipation previews, so let's go through that:

Rock That Body - became Rough Night, sucked
Baby Driver - ruled
Downsizing - did not see yet, word of mouth has grown lesser since its announcement
God Particle - coming out 2018
Untitled Paul Anderson Fashion World Drama - became Phantom Thread, have not seen, but is evidently amazing
Logan Lucky - Definitely underrated, but a clear Soderbergh lesser work
Annihilation - coming out 2018
The Death of Stalin - US Release 2018
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets - nuts, but okay
It Comes at Night - shitty
Mute - 2018
Legacy of a Whitetail Deer Hunter - unknown release
The Coldest City - became Atomic Blonde, ruled
Brawl in Cell Block 99 - Have not seen, but word is it rules
Landline - did not see, relatively little hype
Free Fire - shitty, probably my biggest disappointment of the year.

Well, that's it for the shit we looked forward to. Not too shabby, folks. I could have told myself that xXx: The Return of Xander Cage would suck. I wouldn't have listened. This is the life we chose.

Stay tuned until January when we preview 2018! It never ends!

05 January 2017

Top Pop Culture Bits to Watch in 2017!

I'm going to try so hard this year. This post. RIGHT NOW to get some shit right. No more thinking X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) will be a cool movie (to be fair, it wasn't all thaaat bad). I'm so nervous. I still get excited for some tentpole films that end up crowding this list. Still, I'm trying real damn hard to tempter my expectations. Let's go through all the Vin Diesel-focused events of 2017 that we can articulate some reasonable expectations with and then sort out the intriguing Paul Anderson and Edgar Wright projects later, okay?

Taboo (01/10)
Evil Lincoln!


I've tried to stay away from much other detail about this creepy story of Tom Hardy returning from the dead to Victorian England and ruining everyone's day, but it's certainly the miniseries to catch in early 2017. Tom Hardy's almost becoming too recognizable to be effective, but there's hardly another actor who can throw himself so completely in a character, even if that character is fairly predictable by now. I bet he'll be an ornery loner who grunts more than speaks! I'm curious how weird this gets - Hardy on FX let loose ought to deliver.

Run the Jewels 3 (01/17)

Fucking A. This came out already. It doesn't really reach the heights of Run the Jewels 2, but the third album by the Killer Mike / El P collabo once had a real shot at becoming an early frontrunner for 2017's album of the year. Instead it may kind of end up as a 2016 afterthought that was moved up three weeks and dropped Christmas Day. Confusing for pundits for sure and definitely sneaking out of many Best of Lists that shot their wad prematurely.

xXx: The Return of Xander Cage (01/20)
Sorry, Asia Argento


One of my goals here is to showcase some films that no one and I mean no one else is looking forward to in 2017. Hell fucking yeah Return of Xander Cage. xXx (2002) should never be Google searched, but exists in that holy first period of Diesel prominence, and at the time I loved it a whole lot more than The Fast and the Furious (2001). It doesn't give a shit about anything and relishes its own schlock and stupidity, owning that turn of the century XTREME fad to the max, while also showing some shaky sides of the Diesel. Really! No other movie showed its protagonist shaking and shocked at the end of an intense episode like this until Captain Phillips (2003). XXX:RoXC (oh jeez) looks to be the Fast Five (2011)-ification of this universe, and why not? It will almost surely miss the mark and lack all the great characters that have made Fast a billion-dollar franchise. It's also amazing that Diesel used to avoid any and all non-Riddick sequels, but now he's really into revisiting everything. Or he just likes money. I'm not sure if he understands irony at all, but that's part of what makes Diesel great. I'm going to regret hyping this in twelve months.

Legion (02/08) - FX

Of all the X-Men characters, Chuckie Xavier's weird time travelling son Legion is an odd one to focus a television show around, but that's perhaps exactly the point. It's unexpected and therefore unknown and ripe to mix around however Noah "Fargo" Hawley feels like doing. It looks to be an untraditional story at best, but in rough danger of falling apart. The 90s Legion comics were a trip, but decently inaccessible. Keeping the mythology at arms' length is a good play, but I'm most curious how it ties in (if at all) to the junkiest and oldest contiguous franchise out there.

John Wick: Chapter Two (02/10)

Let's go to something that could actually be awesome. John Wick (2014) was a stunningly good original action film, more so that it was actually good rather than anything revolutionary it did. Amazingly, keeping a frame steady throughout a firefight and letting the actors and stunt people rather than the editing do the work results in a sublime movie! Chapter Two loses the David Leitch part of the directing team, but hopefully Chad Stahelski is fine enough on his own. Laurence Fishburne seems like an uncanny Matrix (1999) reunion that's too on the nose to be accidental considering how much sway Keanu has on this thing. It all looks like a really fun mess that will never be what John Wick was, but based on what we got last time, ought to serve us up a nice couple of hours.

The LEGO Batman Movie (02/10)
How come having every villain ever at once isn't
weird or awful in animation?


There's a lot mixing around here. The LEGO Movie (2014) was an absolute blast, and Will Arnett's bombastic little kid's interpretation of the Dark Knight had a lot to do with it. Caught in between campy and serious views of Batman, he could prove to be the best Batman ever. We'll see when the character is on full display here, seemingly a swath of maniacal ego, darkness, and loneliness - but in a fun way! Chris McKay takes over directorial duties, who has an comedic pedigree for sure, although relatively untested in G/PG realm. Hopes are high for irreverence, especially one that pins holes in a superhero year that features the most grimdark Batman ever, Ben Affleck returning for Justice League (2017) just a few months later.

A Cure for Wellness (02/17)

Dane DeHaan is our best young creepy actor, but he's lacked any sort of defining role, or at least a good movie to exist in. Gore Verblinksi is a supremely underrated director, mostly I think because he trades in excessive bombast more than anyone, but also creates films of sincere symbolic depth that generally challenge accepted blockbuster norms, if not structurally than thematically. This seems to trade on all the work he did prepping a failed or at least not by his hands BioShock movie and trades in the quasi-horror and creepiness that Verblinksi films always flirt with. I'm on board.

Logan (03/03)
"You killed my family!" SNIKT

If we discount Legion and LEGO Batman, this is the first and most anticipated superhero movie of the year. You've torn my heart out time and time again superhero movies, but 2017 looks to be even more subversive than 2016. This past year we really only got Deadpool (2016) that made fun of the genre while actually going through it by the numbers. Captain America: CIVIL WAR (2016) actually did a much better job throwing down and dismantling the formula with a villain that preyed on the hero's perceptions of what movie they were actually in. Anyway, that's a long way of saying that Hugh Jackman's final Wolverine outing (barring Deadpool 2 [2018]) may be his best - a grungy angry Unforgiven (1992) starring a superhero rather than an out and out capes and capers flick. If it even goes that route at all - by all means it could just be a beat-up action film that uses its hero pedigree to sell some tickets. The Wolverine (2013) promised this intimate portrayal, but then largely missed the mark. Hopes are high all around for this, even if James Mangold has had more misses than hits lately.

The Fate of the Furious (04/14)

Listen - I had to. Just read all of this. These films may have topped out actually at Fast & Furious 6 (2013), but what's crazy is how they don't seem afraid to mix up the formula at all. It helps these impeccably similarly titled films to remain distinct. Fast & Furious (2009) was the one that got them back together. Fast Five (2011) saw them heist in brazil. Fast & Furious 6 was them battling their evil-er counterparts in London. Furious 7 (2015) was the spy movie where Paul Walker died. This one is where Dom Toretto is replaced with a mind-controlled clone robot evil brother. Really a pretty simple continuity.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (05/05)
Oh movies are weird.


Comedy and superhero sequels are always tricky, and there's no reason to believe this will work, besides a trailer that is familiar yet different. That's the ultimate bargain. You want to feel the exact same way about a film but have different shit make you feel that way. This is golden for that. My love for Guardians wanes and waxes between cheeky admiration, now overplayed sarcastic character tropes, and then back to a hilarious no frills space romp. With all the pressure in the world this film has thrown up an even bigger middle finger to anyone who cares - from the poster that looks like a Ramones album to a trailer that delivers with characters settled into their roles and really hitting their mark. It'll fail if it goes for more of the same, and the "Hooked on a Feeling" that hits the trailer again feels like going back to the well, even if every single tentpole ever now has a quirky 70s pop song attached nowadays. This needs to rise above its imitators.

Dunkirk (07/21)

I suppose this checks off a list of obvious ones, but even though there seems to be a weird anti-Nolan backlash around the Internet, likely mostly just in contrarian to the universal nerd love he's gotten for so many years, that's not holding me back from getting excited about this. Here's what's not - the general blandness of the trailer, and the acknowledgment that Nolan's films tend to be conceptually intriguing and breathtakingly shot, but in a practical sense bereft of imagination. Creatively daring but practically bankrupt. It's a subtle line. He's never approached a historical epic, though, and I'd love to see what he can bring to the war genre. Harry Styles, though. I may have talked myself out of my anticipation. It will probably look pretty, though.

Blade Runner 2049 (10/06)
Not to mention Ana de Armas in a not "right out
of the shower" role. Presumably.


This is kind of tough. I get the feeling like this is sort of being treated as a big franchise, re-visiting kind of film, although none of that adds up. Blade Runner (1982) was exceptionally unbeloved upon its release, and remains a really really niche film, mostly appealing to sci-fi nerds, film nerds, or people who like to track the influence of giant flaming cityscapes. Denis Villeneuve may be the best working non-Paul Anderson director right now, but the most cash he's ever brought in was for this year's Arrival (2016), which is by far his most accessible film. Handling Blade Runner 2049 seems like something he'd go nuts with, although Ryan Gosling is just about at a career peak and Harrison Ford's late age bankability is strong after he brought back Han Solo. Give the meat to Gosling, treat the material like it's new and this will be good. Pander to Deckard and Scott and this will suck tits. I can't imagine Villeneuve catering and bowing down to studio influences. Right?

So those are all the really obvious choices for 2017. Let's get into some of the smaller scheduled films that could make a splash that will likely actually be much better:

Rock That Body - The cast is like SNL mixed with Broad City and lead by Scarlett Johansson. A summer release comedy with shades of Bridesmaids, which is likely exactly how it got made.
Baby Driver - a non-Cornetto Trilogy Edgar Wright film, which has been taking up his time since his departure from Ant-Man (2015). It's also written by Wright and has a likewise awesome cast, although not many of his regulars. This is really the time to see whether or not Wright is a sustainable non-Simon Pegg director.
Downsizing - a Matt Damon shrinking movie by Alexander Payne. This will do.
God Particle - for some reason this is another Cloverfield movie, which seems to have even less to do with Clover than 10 Cloverfield Lane (2016). Director Julius Onah is untested, but the cast is sweet and the premise of a vanishing Earth as seen from space is intriguing. Could be another Passengers (2016), could be another Moon (2009). Who knows.
Untitled Paul Anderson Fashion World Drama - this is all you need. Seems kind of Neon Demon (2016)-y, possibly with less eyeball eating (or hell, more!), but this is like the third time I've cited Paul Anderson as our greatest current working director, so there.
Logan Lucky - there's a lot to like here. Steve Soderbergh's coming out of retirement party (we all could have called that), his current muse, Channing Tatum and Adam Driver star as brothers performing some kind of NASCAR heist. 2017 Upcoming It Girl Riley Keough supports, as does Seth MacFarlane in an extremely rare live action supporting role in something he didn't write or direct. Mind-blowing.
Annihilation - Alex Garland's Ex Machina (2015) follow-up features a bunch of chicks who head to the jungle lead by Natalie Portman fresh off her Oscar win. Or nomination. Or sat at home and we all lie about how we liked Jackie (2016).
The Death of Stalin - there's a weird and wonderful cast here, from Timothy Dalton to Steve Buscemi, but I'm intrigued by the subject matter of where and how the CCCP went after Stalin kicked the bucket.
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets - Luc Besson is riding high after Lucy (2015), even if his ambition was a bit over his delivery, but this looks like a grand original sci-fi tale that's got to remind you of The Fifth Element (1997). Cara and Dane look great and the title's a mouthful, but this will definitely make like $10 million in the States and $500 million worldwide.
It Comes at Night - Joel Edgerton, who is suddenly a good actor, and Riley Keough...again (see what I meant?) in this mysterious number shepherded by A24, who has produced all the good movies lately.
Mute - Duncan Jones gets off the Warcraft (2016) trainwreck and into a more Moon-like bit with Alex "Tarzan" SkarsgÃ¥rd as a mute in future Berlin or something. Everyone involved was once good and has done much shit in the past few years. Let's get back to the good.
Legacy of a Whitetail Deer Hunter - Jody Hill has been busy on the small screen but returns here in what could be a comedy, or maybe a tragedy about Josh Brolin hunting with his son. It will likely be equal parts a bit of both.
The Coldest City - Consider this the other half of John Wick. In between producing Chapter 2 and also sinking into Deadpool 2, David Leitch lends some hopeful action expertise to Charlize Theron in this Berlin Wall spy thriller. Down.
Brawl in Cell Block 99 - S. Craig Zahler, who gave us the brutal yet underrated Bone Tomahawk (2015) gets Vince Vaughn to try his True Detective mode again. If anything, we're intrigued. Also some kind of prison fight.
Landline - Gillian Robespierre does Obvious Child (2014) again, in the 90s, with an awesome cast of actresses, including Jenny Slate again. On board.
Free Fire - this one just got a trailer, which ruled and looks all sorts of incredible. Just a straight no holds-barred gun fight in the 70s. Armie Hammer being a doofus and Brie Larson in between Oscar winning and Captain Marvel roles. I'm in.

So folks, what do you think? What did I miss? I'm not getting excited about Apes or Spider-Man or Jedis anymore. I just can't. What's in your Top 2017 List?
Related Posts with Thumbnails