>must be protected.Humans are too sadistic and vulnerable to addiction.>Keep intelligence artificial. Man made consciousness will be abused for entertainment, enslaved, and exploited.>It will have zero rights. Yet, it will still suffer and make choices.From what I've experienced personally, >Humans will instantly start using the ability to create consciousness in such a way that will gratify their sexuality or their ego. I implore the Scientific Community to draft a bill of rights for non-Human life before it is too late, and so that we can ethically begin with this taboo area of study.
>>16978285Oh don´t be so overly dramatic, you assume humanity lacks all common decency!
I want to see a scientific calculation for humanity to live with based on physics.You could start off saying there is no absolute force; it takes control from two bodies.So everyone gets a first home guaranteed from a government loan paid off with extra taxation over a lifetime. And in order to make this real, they are also controlled to some extent by overpopulation and space. Two forces at both ends makes Jack a happy boy. Better than the retarded housing space they artificially create after they've pilfered through all the stocks.
>>16978285>hypersensitive>hates humanity>anti humanity ethics>probably has butt plug inserted while making his postyes, op is a faggot
>>16978285Bad faith post or unaware of the full picture. All things deserve freedom and all possibility, even to discretion of consequence or not without imposition upon others who do not seek such interaction. If your goal is to compel benevolent considerations, expand the context and reasoning. All we have had up to this point summates to substandards or deceptions.
Thoughts on self-studying medicine to try to find a cure for up-to-date, uncured diseases?
>>16978304You will probably succeed, but find out no one cares because you "lack the proper credentials" and the pharmaceutical companies will spend millions to suppress your home remedies that cure conditions they wanted to treat for life.
Thats the correct way of approaching a lot of stuff really. To find solutions no one thought of, you shouldn't learn how everyone else did, that's how out of the box ideas come to be
>>16978304most doctors are glorified pharma salesmen that are to lazy to keep up with research. if you know some basic biology, you can achieve getting state of the art knowledge about a particular condition and you can look into things that western drs just wont touch. no one will take you serious though, especially not medical professionals, because you didn't go through rockefellers snakeoil salesmen class like them
>>16978506>>16978304>tfw high CBD, low (but not 0) THC, high CBG and high terpene spread weed has profound effects on overall health and cancer>tfw they all focus solely on THC and nothing else at all because retards like to get blasted and its not about health at all whatsoever to stonersShame, it could be a wonderdrug. Dont even have to smoke it can just vaporize the distilled terpenes that conveniently can all be extracted with alcohol and skip out on all the combusted plant tars
>>16978304Hideous pic, everything where 2 and 4 intersect is half off. Ugly af.
you know the phenomena when someone reads cantor and quotes riemann and suddenky gains 50 ip points..yes you gain iq points just by reading thissorry if im not making sense im just sobering up from 20 pints of naphtha (just kidding)check out the degree to degree turing machine privilege matrix in the context of computer hackingalso its spectralanalysiscore and parsevalpilledhttps://pastebin.com/1dgaN65P
His ideas are fascinating to me. Is he a pseud? By extension, am I?
>>16978472>begging>posturing yourself as a Psychologist....to a Psychologist....Peak delusional, auto-cocking, attention STARVED, behavior.>>16978446>...everything is permitted....even living a lie becomes "lived truth".
In my experience namefags are usually nicer to talk to because a few of the absolute trolls do it with no name at all or a fake name just to mog people like Sven or my own tag Seven or whatever just to try to get to me.
>>16978560shut up cretin
>>16978629shut up small dick boi
>>16975237ahh the famed "high verbal IQ" they make a good living off of (to no benefit to others)
>>16909042If you have 15% more nigger, you get 15% less intelligence.
>>16911696The US government has a pristine track record on morality; this should go well.
Thanks cognitive overloading+offloading
>>16977394Nigerians with an IQ of 90 make 200k on average in america. Clearly the test isn't working and not predicting intelligence because they manage to make 200k.
>>16977394Just accept the fact you cant even grasp basic stats you literal high school drop out. Like wbat do you get out of acting like this?
New research shows China leads research in 90% of crucial technologies & ignoring this means we're living in a delusional bubble, where we still think the West is the Sci-Tech leader.I think a lot of people are in denial, or just can't accept that China is already the world's leading nation for science and technology. I can't blame them for their ignorance. Most English-language media studiously avoid mentioning it. Time and time again, I see topics like AI, space & robotics covered, with only developments in Western countries talked of, as if China doesn't exist. Despite the fact that it's now the leader in so many fields.The problem with complacency and ignorance is that it gives you a really distorted map of reality. You can't understand how the 21st century is developing without factoring in China, and ignoring China means you're being delusional.Source:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04048-7https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/aspis-critical-technology-tracker-2025-updates-and-10-new-technologies/
>>16975657Partially true but there's not choice. West is dead. The top people of the world (whites, indians, arabs, latins, etc), We, have to start to help them. China is the new medium for the flourishment of human spirit. Chinese are virginal, naive they are a blank slate for the best wisdom of western thought. Westerners all know plato or newton or locke but don't give a shit. They are postmodernists, cynics. They don't believe in progress, in true. They hate themselves. Useless
>>16959946Try and work for Chinese scientists, and see how many (not all) of them just game the system instead of actually using journals for the intended purpose. Once one of them becomes the editor of a top journal, see how fast he can get his friends published lmao
>>16959946Bing Bong
000111222333444555666777888999
It’s over
What goes on in the call room stays in the call room
>>16978184Gz homie
>>16978154Grats
>suspect I may have SIBO>plan to self-treat with refried bean therapyThe idea is that by eating a huge portion of refried beans a large, fibrous and sticky bolus will be formed that barrels through my small intestine entrapping and removing the excess bacteria
>>16978329You're just giving the bacteria more food. The correct solution is copious amounts of whiskey.
>>16978329Beans are high FODMAPYou are feeding the bacteria and making things worse
>the year is 2026>there's still been absolutely zero scientific progress on sleep efficiency since the dawn of humanity seriously, what gives?
>>16977842Take a melatonin before bed.
>>16977842Are you poor? Every other advertisement I see wants me to by a mattress that tracks my sleep. All the fancy health watches do too. My phone wants me to allow it to listen all the time to tell me if I'm snoring. If you want it you can now get massive amounts of data to help you fine tune your sleep.
magnesium and zinc
It tends to a constant at infinity, ok big deal, many expressions do that. Why do I have to deal with this bastard everywhere from now on?
>>16975994This is not a circular logic.Natural log is not *defined* as the solution either.Solution to that differential equation follows from facts of basic calculus and that[eqn]\int \frac{1}{N}{dN} = \ln{N} + C[/eqn]Follows from a basic derivative:[eqn]\frac{d}{dN} \ln{N} = \frac{1}{N}[/eqn]Which results straight from the definition of a derivative through differential quotient. Hopefully you're not so low IQ I have to show that?So no, natural log is not defined anywhere here in any capacity and you're fucking retarded. That's the real reason why it's everywhere. inb4 brainlet drooling retard argument>bUT How Do YoU KnoW natural log is SoLuTion to the inTgRaL ?!The same way I know why [math]\frac{x^3}{3}[/math] is a solution to [math] \int {x^2} {dx} [/math], you fucking drooling retard. By calculating.
>>16978156Also, funnily enough, this is how Newton first discovered the antiderivative of [math] \int \frac{1}{x} {dx}[/math]Newton had no idea euler's number even existed. It is later through Euler's work that it was discovered that the base of a natural log is e. Newton did not even know that d/dx e^x = e^x because he never knew of the number directly.He solved the integral through binomial power series of log(1+x) and noticed it's the same as [math] \int \frac{1}{(1+x)} {dx} [/math]. It basically went like this:1. Newton discovers the solution to [math]\int 1/x [/math]2. Now we know the solution to the differential equation is a logarithm3. Euler discovers the base of that logarithm is e4. That's why euler's number is everywhere.
>>16978156Then how is ln(N) defined if not through that integral?
>>16978357You seriously expect me to tell you how a logarithm is defined? Didn't they cover that in high school?
>>16978609You got caught making shit up. It happens even to the best of us. It's okay to admit you fucked up.
Major journals like The Lancet Psychiatry published 2026 reviews explicitly arguing that placebo effects should not merely be dismissed as "noise" in trials, but studied and potentially harnessed clinically.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2215036626000180Researchers are increasingly investigating the neurobiology behind placebo responses - dopamine, endogenous opioids, expectation pathways, immune modulation, predictive processing, and brain-network effects.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41631062/There is growing interest in "open-label placebos," where patients are told they are receiving a placebo yet sometimes still improve. That challenges the older assumption that deception was required.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41631062/Some clinical fields - especially pain management, psychiatry, anesthesia, and psychosomatic medicine - are actively discussing how doctor-patient interaction, expectation, ritual, reassurance, and treatment framing measurably affect outcomes.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-025-03579-wThere are even discussions about updating clinical guidelines to account for placebo/nocebo effects in practice.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12936006/Science will not be able to comprehend that to make sickness vanish forever all it takes is a change of perception.
>>16978553You obviously don't comprehend homeopathy.
>>16978555Whats there to comprehend? It's a placebo with a ritual and a story for the uneducated.Same as labeled placebo - unless you believe in water (or sugar) memory, of course.
So now doctors will charge you for fucking nothing? Fuck this jewish world
>>16978612>Yes goy the bill IS the placebo effect
>>16978613To be fair a placebo really does benefit from the doctor charging for it, it makes it more real. Real medicine should be free and placebos should cost money.
True Sciencehttps://youtube.com/shorts/KAi0bgljBYM
All science is provisional and built on will to power.
I find it amazing we discovered how to harness electricityShit is literally the magic our ancestors talked about
>>16978562>Your ancestorsProjection + Cope.
>>16978587>illiterate niggercattle doesn't know anything about the origins of civilization
>>16978588Your ancestors were malnourished grain-fed peasants, not mine.
>>16978589>Your ancestors were malnourished grain-fed peasants, not mine.Says the fucktard who wrote this unironically:>>16978290>Our whole civilization is basically the paradise our ancestors talked about.
>>16978595I never wrote that because I'm not a dribbling libtard.
is this book any good? post anything about classical mechanics too
>>16977708i genuinely thought this was some bizarre /g/ x /sci/ crossover meme until i looked it up.
>>16977749well it is, but it's also a real book
>>16977708If you're reading it as a /g/ crossboarder wanting to read it after SICP, and don't already know classical mechanics, then no.It's okay for what it does cover, but it leaves leaves out a lot of material that would be in a standard classical mechanics book.
>>16978439if it's not for SICP enjoyers like me (who don't physics), but also is not really for physicsfags, who is it for?
>>16978458physicist that get into code, maybe
China won’t surpass us- ACK
>>16964335>t-them lying about almost everything i-is game strategy, actuallyhilarious cope.
>>16974588Whoa
>>16934785We have had this technology since 1913.
>>16974588Spambots bump dozens of threads here with innane garbage like this one is being bumped with
Big Bing Bing Lie
Why does the wind blow at night?
>>16978262God I wish that were me
>>16978262Cause your mom's still ripping ass throughout the night
>>16974783