Showing posts with label Robert Crumb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Crumb. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Robert Crumb: ‘I was born weird'





Robert Crumb: ‘I was born weird'


He’s obsessed with ‘spectacular rear ends’ and he calls his fans scum. Yet comic artist Robert Crumb is at risk of becoming respectable. As his new show opens, he talks about filth, fetishes and his idea of fun

Claire Armistead
Sunday 24 April 2016


R
obert Crumb is caught in traffic, allowing us time to snoop out the best place for a photoshoot in the upmarket London gallery where more than 50 of his pictures are on display. It all looks so well mannered, this orderly line of black-and-white illustrations, and then you peer into the pictures and the familiar rude energy comes roistering out.


We decide that we will place him between an erotic rear view of the tennis player Serena Williams and a homely portrait of his wife of almost 40 years, Aline Kominsky-Crumb, in bed with her laptop. Aline is the chunky brunette who features in so much of Robert’s work - not least in the three issues of Art & Beauty magazine that are the subject of this exhibition.
It is Robert, not Aline, who I have come to interview, and whose pictures are on sale at a starting price of $30,000 (£20,800), but their art is so intertwined that it’s hard to understand either in isolation. One collaboration, unprecedented in the history of comics or indeed any art, had husband and wife each drawing themselves in the throes of sex with each other.

As we wait for the great man to arrive, Lucas Zwirner, the 25-year-old editor of the gallery’s publishing outlet, gives a learned explanation of the appeal of Crumb’s work to a new generation. “What’s exciting about the work is his openness to his own desire and erotics,” he enthuses. “There’s something irreconcilable at the heart of the work that doesn’t resolve towards a single vision of beauty, and which is at odds with much contemporary art. It’s about seduction and repulsion. You are drawn into the work and you are judging yourself as you look at it.”
Or, as Crumb says when he finally shuffles in, clad in funereal black and wearing his trademark wire glasses: “The dirt’s on the wall.” At 72, he is a paler, frailer version of the priapic nerd of more than half a century of self-portraits.



Art & Beauty showcases a less well-known side of him: the lifelong junk shop rummager and connoisseur of vintage media, which he values for the craftsmanship of “the golden age of graphic art”. Published in 1996 and 2002, with the third volume yet to hit the streets, the project was inspired by a soft porn magazine of the 1920s that smuggled risque photographs past the censor under the titular fig leaf Art & Beauty Magazine for Art Lovers and Art Students.
Pinterest
 Robert Crumb’s 2002 drawing of Serena Williams. Photograph: Courtesy the artist, Paul Morris, and David Zwirner, New York/London
Some of its pictures are copied directly from vintage magazines – not least two ethnographic images, Handsome Women of the Formidable Zulu Race, in the second volume, and Three African Women from Brazzaville, Congo, in the third. These decorously posed tableaux speak to Crumb’s less decorous fascination with the bodies of black women.
Which brings us to that picture of Serena Williams, caught mid-smash at Flushing Meadow in 2002, with her breasts and backside jutting from a black Lycra catsuit. The inscription below the picture reads: “A HIGHLY SATISFYING CHALLENGE FOR THE ARTIST’S SKILLS ARE THE GLEAMING HIGHLIGHTS ON THE RESPLENDENT CONTOURS OF TENNIS CHAMPION SERENA WILLIAM AS SHE APPEARED ON THE FIRST NIGHT OF THE US OPEN …”
It’s an extreme image, arresting and disturbing, and when I say as much he responds a little defensively: “It was traced from a photograph.”

Yes, but why that picture?
“It’s my personal fetish or fixation.”
The fetish is not with Serena Williams as tennis champion so much as with her “spectacular back end”. His insistence that “I don’t care what colour they are” is complicated by another caption beneath a blonde gymnast astride a Swiss exercise ball: “The lovely Coco is renowned the world over as a white girl who is the proud possessor of a striking physical attribute most often claimed by women of African descent.”
 Another illustration by Crumb from Art & Beauty magazine. Photograph: Courtesy the artist, Paul Morris, and David Zwirner, New York/London

Part of the paradox of Crumb’s art is that the objects of his erotic fixation are often dynamic, powerful women, depicted in gymnastics or yoga or sport. He traces this fetish back to his childhood, explaining morosely: “I was always a contrarian. My wife says sometimes I’m too much so – born weird. I always felt there’s something odd and off about my nervous system. If everybody’s walking forward, I want to walk backwards.
“During adolescence I couldn’t fit in, and it was very, very painful. But it fired me to develop my own aesthetic. I was very much in pain about being this outcast, but it freed me to drop that Hollywood ideal and pursue the people that I thought attractive.”
When he became successful in the 1960s with creations such as Fritz the Cat or Mr Natural, the mystic druid, “certain eccentric kinds of women got interested in me.” One of them was his first wife, Dana Morgan, and together, they hawked “cheap, stapled comics” on the streets: “My wife was pregnant and we sold them out of a baby pram.” In 1978, he was married a second time, to Aline, making it a condition of their relationship that he could not be monogamous. They have a daughter Sophie, now a comics artist herself.
Robert Crumb and Aline Kominsky-Crumb at home in France.
Pinterest
 Robert Crumb and Aline Kominsky-Crumb at home in France. Photograph: Eamonn McCabe for the Guardian
A few miles away from Crumb’s pumped-up fantasy women, Aline’s work is on display at the House of Illustration, as part of an exhibition of work by female comic artists. In a talk that evening she will be hailed as a feminist pioneer. “It’s nice to be getting a little attention every once in a while,” she says drily.
In the 1970s and 80s, while Aline’s reputation grew as a chronicler of the messiness of family life, Crumb’s portrayal of women, and his sexually rampant self-portraiture, led to vilification by feminist critics. “It had some validity,” he says now. “My work is full of anger towards women. I was sent to Catholic school with scary nuns and I was rejected by girls at high school. I sort of got it out of my system, but anger is normal between the sexes. OK, it can go to the top and men can harm women, but if anyone says they are not angry I don’t believe it, especially while your libido is still going. The men who are most charming are often the most contemptuous.”
Like who? “Like Sam Shepard,” he snaps. “His work is just a seduction of women.” He has said similar things about Martin Amis and Christopher Hitchens.

In the 90s, his ascent to the high table of art began. A 1994 documentary by his friend and bandmate Terry Zwigoff won the grand jury prize at the Sundance film festival (the two had formed a retro band, R Crumb and His Cheap Suit Serenaders, in the 70s), and the hefty The R Crumb Coffee Table Art Book was published in 1997. Three years later, he was picked up by the New York art dealer Paul Morris. “It was like being a tramp outside a fancy restaurant watching people eat and someone suddenly says, ‘Come in and eat with us.’ I never aspired to that other world of symphony orchestras and ballet. I was the child of popular culture. I just wanted to get my work published,” he says.

Morris explains how, in early exhibitions, he had to put alarms on Crumb’s work to foil hardcore fans whose sense of entitlement extended to the right to walk off with the pictures. “The scum of the earth. They’re my people,” chortles Crumb, who is tickled by the contradictions of his two worlds. Collectors of cheap comics insist on pristine copies, while fine-art connoisseurs prize the “white-out” of Tipp-Exed corrections that vein his Art & Beauty pictures. He exploited this to the max with four Waiting for Food series – drawings on place mats, which were then sold individually. “Collectors love to get a little marinara sauce with their art.”
 A Crumb illustration from Art & Beauty No 2. Photograph: Courtesy the artist, Paul Morris, and David Zwirner, New York/London
Even before the third edition of Art & Beauty has hit the streets courtesy of his old publisher, Fantagraphics, the images have been collected into an elegant hardback, edited by Zwirner, that doubles as an exhibition catalogue and retails at £24.
Although he mournfully insists that his work isn’t as fashionable today as it once was – to a chorus of dissent from Zwirner and Morris – he cheers up when he contemplates the upsides of the new era. Phone cameras, for instance, which allow him and Aline to “capture the commonplace” of scantily clad women waiting in cinema queues or at ice-cream stands. And selfies, “one of the technological miracles of the age we live in”.
Robert Crumb’s Untitled, 2015, from Art & Beauty magazine.
Pinterest
 Robert Crumb’s Untitled, 2015, from Art & Beauty magazine. Photograph: Courtesy the artist and Paul Morris, and David Zwirner Gallery
It’s a technology that wasn’t around for the first two editions of Art & Beauty and it has given this satirist of desire, whose pneumatic women hold a warped mirror up to commercialised ideals of waiflike fashion models and muscle-bound action heroes, a whole new playpen.
In one picture, sent directly to his website, a young Latina woman photographs herself in various states of undress. The caption reports that, after listing her age, height and vital statistics, she wrote: “It would be a big pleasure to be a part of your art.” It continues: “In reply, we can only say, the pleasure is ours.” That knowing repetition of the word “pleasure” takes you straight to the little speccy guy, just out of frame, squirming with lust behind his drawing pad.
 Art & Beauty is at David Zwirner Gallery, London, until 2 June
 This article was amended on 25 April 2016 to clarify that it was with his first wife that Robert Crumb sold comics out of a baby pram.

Thursday, October 31, 2019

The 100 greatest novels of all time / No 3 / Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe (1719)




The 100 greatest 

noveloall time

No. 03

Robinson Crusoe

by Daniel Defoe

(1719)






Robert McCrum
Sunday 23 September 2013 

Robinson Crusoe

A 1719 illustration of Robinson Crusoe and Man Friday on the desert island. Photograph: Mpi/Getty Images
English fiction began with The Pilgrim's Progress, but nearly 50 turbulent years, including the Glorious Revolution, passed before it made its great leap forward. The author of this literary milestone is a strangely appealing literary hustler of nearly 60 years old originally named Daniel Foe (he added "De" to improve his social standing), a one-time journalist, pamphleteer, jack of all trades and spy. Like Bunyan, he had suffered at the hands of the state (the pillory, followed by prison in 1703). Unlike Bunyan, he was not religious.
His world-famous novel is a complex literary confection. It purports to be a history, written by Crusoe himself, and edited by Daniel Defoe who, in the preface, teasingly writes that he "believes the thing to be a just History of Fact; neither is there any Appearance of Fiction in it".



So what do we find in this "History" ? Robinson Crusoe has three elements that make it irresistible. First, the narrative voice of the castaway is Defoe's stroke of genius. It's exciting, unhurried, conversational and capable of high and low sentiments. It's also often quasi-journalistic, which suits Defoe's style. This harmonious mix of tone puts the reader deep into the mind of the castaway and his predicament. His adventures become our adventures and we experience them inside out, viscerally, for ourselves. Readers often become especially entranced by Crusoe's great journal, the central passage of his enforced sequestration.
And here is Defoe's second great inspiration. He comes up with a tale, often said to be modelled on the story of the castaway Alexander Selkirk, that, like Bunyan's, follows an almost biblical pattern of trangression (youthful rebellion), retribution (successive shipwrecks), repentance (the painful lessons of isolation) and finally redemption (Crusoe's return home). In storytelling terms, this is pure gold.


And third, how can we forget Defoe's characters? The pioneer novelist understood the importance of attaching memorably concrete images to his narrative and its characters. Friday and his famous footstep in the sand, one of the four great moments in English fiction, according to Robert Louis Stevenson; Crusoe with his parrot and his umbrella: these have become part of English myth. Defoe, like Cervantes, also opts to give his protagonist a sidekick. Friday is to Crusoe what Sancho Panza is to Quixote. Doubles in English literature will regularly recur in this list: Jekyll and Hyde, Holmes and Watson, Jeeves and Wooster.
Which brings me to Defoe's final quality as a writer. He was the complete professional, dipped in ink. Throughout his life, he produced pamphlets, squibs, narrative verse and ghosted ephemera (he is said to have used almost 200 pen names). He was a man who liked to be paid for what he wrote, lived well and was almost always in debt. He was not a "literary novelist", and would not have understood the term, but his classic novel is English literature at its finest, and he hit the jackpot with Robinson Crusoe.
By the end of the 19th century, no book in English literary history had enjoyed more editions, spin-offs and translations than Robinson Crusoe, with more than 700 alternative versions, including illustrated children's versions. The now-forgotten term "Robinsonade" was coined to describe the Crusoe genre, which still flourishes and was recently revived by Hollywood in the Tom Hanks film, Castaway (2000).
Note on the text:
The text was first published in London by W Taylor on 25 April 1719. This first edition credited the work's fictional protagonist Robinson Crusoe as its author, and its title was The Life and Strange Surprizing Adventures of Robinson Crusoe of York, Mariner: Written by Himself. It sold well; four months later, it was followed by The Further Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. A year later, riding high on the market, came Serious Reflections During the Life and Surprizing Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. Most readers will only encounter the first edition.



Monday, May 30, 2016

The 100 best nonfiction books / No 18 / The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan (1963)



The 100 best nonfiction books: No 18 – The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan (1963)

The book that ignited second-wave feminism captured the frustration of a generation of middle-class American housewives by daring to ask ‘is this all?’
Robert McCrumb
Monday 30 May 2016

‘I thought there was something wrong with me because I didn’t have an orgasm waxing the kitchen floor’: Betty Friedan in 1970. Photograph: Tim Boxer/Getty Images
Betty Friedan, the godmother of the postwar US women’s movement, was an accidental feminist. “Until I started writing [The Feminine Mystique]” she confessed in 1973, “I wasn’t even conscious of the woman problem.” Friedan had begun her research into “the problem that has no name” – a catchy homage to “the love that dare not speak its name” of Oscar Wilde’s fin-de-siècle disgrace – as part of her work for a questionnaire of her former college classmates on their 15th reunion in 1957, thinking that she would “disprove the current notion that education had fitted us ill for our role as women”.






When Friedan discovered that many of her former classmates were unhappy with their lives as women in society she pitched an article based on the questionnaire to McCall’s magazine, which “turned the piece down in horror”. By now, she was sure she was “on the track of something. But what?” Gradually, “from somewhere deep within me”, a project that was now becoming a book began to take shape. “I have never experienced anything as powerful, truly mystical, as the forces that seemed to take me over when I was writing The Feminine Mystique”, she wrote later, in an almost perfect summary of that peculiar literary phenomenon, the zeitgeist book.As the critic Jay Parini has written, Friedan’s work “almost single-handedly ignited a revolutionary phase that has deeply affected the lives of countless American women and men”. Or, as Alvin Toffler put it, hers was a book “that pulled the trigger on history”. Rarely has a title in this series flown off the shelves as this did, selling 300,000 copies within the first year. Thirteen foreign language translations followed. Within three years of the book’s publication, Friedan had sold more than 3m copies.
Friedan herself professed puzzlement about what it was she had identified, right up to publication. After five years research and hard work in the New York Public Library, she continued to see herself as the prisoner of “that mystique, which kept us passive”. Indeed, in common with many American women of the early 1960s, she “thought there was something wrong with me because I didn’t have an orgasm waxing the kitchen floor. I was a freak, writing that book.”
Today, The Feminine Mystique seems far from freaky, at times even staid verging on reactionary. Still, it retains a polemical undertow that’s plainly designed to shift the minds of her readers. Compared to the other classic postwar statement of feminism, The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir, Friedan speaks quite practically to the concerns of middle-class American housewives, but mainly about the independent woman’s life in house and home. “The problem,” begins Friedan’s narrative, “lay buried, unspoken, for many years in the minds of American women. Each suburban wife struggled with it alone. As she made the beds, shopped for groceries, chauffeured Cub Scouts and Brownies, lay beside her husband at night – she was afraid to ask even of herself the silent question – ‘Is this all?’”
In a society famously dedicated to “the pursuit of happiness”, Friedan reported that American women had lost their smiles. “I feel empty,” declared this first generation of desperate housewives. Friedan intensified her argument by braiding it with one of many personal admissions: a slave to the feminine mystique, she had made her own sacrifices for “the dream of love”, and become frustrated. (She, and her estranged husband, Carl, would fight about their marriage up to and beyond their eventual divorce.) Away from her failing home life, as a seasoned magazine journalist she conducted more reportage into the condition of female college students (“I don’t want a career I’ll have to give up”, says one) following this up with a fairly simplistic assault on Freud (“the puritan old maid who sees sex everywhere”) and then against social anthropology, and Margaret Mead, whom Friedan convicts for “the glorification of the female role”.Having anatomised this crisis of identity among American women, at least to her own satisfaction, Friedan wrenches her argument back to the present. She and her generation, she argues, are victims of the 20th century, specifically the depression, the second world war, and the anomie of the atomic age. The baby boom, she says, was a reaction to more than a decade of dehumanising crisis, an instinctive quest for the traditional comforts of hearth and home. She is not really against this, rather determined to level the playing field for husbands and wives.




Pinterest
Watch an interview with Betty Friedan on Canada’s CBC.

As Friedan’s narrative works through sex, consumerism and dehumanisation, she builds to her stirring conclusion: “the feminine mystique has succeeded in burying millions of American women alive”.
Finally, after a call to have contemporary women taking up roles “requiring initiative, leadership and responsibility”, her book becomes a rallying cry, exhorting women to make change happen for themselves. This path to liberation, she concedes, would not be easy. Nevertheless, now was the time for a final breakthrough: “In the light of women’s long battle for emancipation, the recent sexual counter-revolution [of the 1950s] has been perhaps a final crisis before the larva breaks out of the shell into maturity.” Women, who had allowed the liberation of wartime to be taken away from them, would soon recognise their self-incarceration and break free, sexually and socially.

Friedan’s sometimes awkward, occasionally inspired rhetoric would underpin women’s lib, which in turn would morph into the ongoing feminist revolution in the writing of Susan Brownmiller, Germaine Greer (No 13 in this series), Gloria Steinem, Kate Millett, even Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth (1991), and many more. Few books in this series have enjoyed such a direct and immediate influence on their readership. Friedan, who died in 2006, was a magazine journalist more than a literary writer, but unquestionably a 20th-century icon. To her admirers, she was the woman who changed the course of history for American women. In her obituary notice, Germaine Greer wrote a more careful verdict. Friedan had pioneered something important, even if subsequent feminists were uneasy in her company, and “though her behaviour was often tiresome, she had a point. Women don’t get the respect they deserve unless they are wielding male-shaped power.”

A signature sentence

“With a vision of the happy modern housewife as she is described by the magazines and television, by the functional sociologists, the sex-directed educators, and the manipulators dancing before my eyes, I went in search of one of those mystical creatures.”

Three to compare

AC Kinsey, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948)
Kate Millett: Sexual Politics (1969)
Susan Brownmiller: Against Our Will (1975)




THE 100 BEST NONFICTION BOOKS OF ALL TIME