"A REALLY INTELLIGENT INTERVIEWER." -- Lance Henriksen
"QUITE SIMPLY, THE BEST HORROR-THEMED BLOG ON THE NET." -- Joe Maddrey, Nightmares in Red White & Blue

**Find The Vault of Horror on Facebook and Twitter, or download the new mobile app!**

**Check out my other blogs, Standard of the Day, Proof of a Benevolent God and Lots of Pulp!**


Showing posts with label book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book. Show all posts

Friday, September 7, 2012

Nosferatu at 90: Florence Stoker, Vampire Hunter

The year is 1912. Bram Stoker, author of Dracula, has passed away. Some attribute the cause to syphilis. Left behind is his beautiful wife, Florence Anne Lemon Stoker, née Balcombe, a demure and striking stage actress when she married the Irish theatrical agent in 1878 at the age of 20. Now a widow in her 50s, with one grown son starting a family of his own, Florence finds herself struggling financially--a sad burden compounded no doubt by the rumors surrounding her husband's death. Ironically, the one thing that remained to her as far as financial means was the copyright to her late husband's famous vampire novel.

Fast forward a decade. A relatively new entertainment medium, cinema, is finally hitting its full stride and one of the epicenters of the explosion is Germany, where an Expressionist movement is taking the country by storm. A small art collective known as Prana Films, spearheaded by artist and spiritualist Albin Grau, produces a vampire film called Nosferatu, Eine Symphonie des Grauens, whose screenplay, penned by Henrik Galeen, has taken for its direct inspiration Stoker's Dracula. However, to avoid having to pay anything for intellectual rights, Prana Films never seeks permission from Florence Stoker, still alive and well in Britain. The names and places in the silent film are all changed from the novel in a naive attempt to avoid infringement. Count Dracula becomes Count Orlock.

Florence Balcombe, sketched by her former
love interest, Oscar Wilde.



On March 4, 1922, Nosferatu enjoys a lavish premiere at Marble Hall of the Berlin Zoological Gardens, complete with live musical accompaniment and sound effects. The following month, Florence Stoker receives an anonymous letter from Berlin, containing a program from the premiere. The program directly states that Nosferatu has been "freely adapted from Bram Stoker's Dracula". Having received no permission requests, nor even being aware of the film's existence up to this point, the 62-year-old widow, still depending on whatever income she can get from the novel's copyright, is outraged.

What follows is a one-woman crusade the likes of which has never been seen in film history, before or since. Represented by the British Incorporated Society of Authors, Florence Stoker, as literary executor for the estate of her late husband, files a sweeping lawsuit against Prana Films which calls not only for financial compensation for the use of her intellectual property, but also the complete and total destruction of the film itself.

The legal battle would rage for over three years. Prana Films declared bankruptcy due to legal costs, and also in an attempt to avoid making payments to Mrs. Stoker.  Meanwhile, the company's lone production, Nosferatu, continued to play throughout Germany and Hungary, but nowhere else, its international distribution halted by the litigious ruckus. Ironically, the success of the film in its homeland had made Stoker's copyright even more valuable than before. Prana would even try to make a deal with her, offering to cut her in on the film's profits if she would allow them to expand the release and use the Dracula name. She refused, insisting again on the torching of the film.

Hamilton Deane
While the suit took its course, Stoker was simultaneously negotiating with producer and Dublin neighbor Hamilton Deane, who sought to bring the novel to the stage. His officially licensed theatrical production of Dracula would premiere in Derby in 1924. It was an immediate hit, and its success helped boost the fortunes of Florence Stoker, who was also on the verge of winning her lawsuit with the doomed Prana Films.

In July 1925, the court ruled that Prana Films was in direct copyright infringement of the intellectual property of Florence Stoker. Financial reparations were ordered, but the failed company was unable to pay. The court also ordered that the negative of Nosferatu, as well as all known prints, be rounded up and promptly destroyed--the only known case of a "capital punishment" ruling on a major motion picture. It would be the only movie ever made by Prana, and had not been seen by anyone outside of Germany and Hungary--including Florence Stoker.

With Nosferatu seemingly destroyed, Stoker continued to reap the rewards of Deane's official stage adaptation. In fact, she granted the American stage rights to producer Horace Liveright in 1927 and Liveright hired John L. Balderston to adapt the play for U.S. audiences. It premiered on Broadway with virtually unknown Hungarian actor (had he seen Nosferatu during its release?) Bela Lugosi as Count Dracula, and ran for a year on Broadway and two more on tour. However, in another case of intellectual property shenanigans, it turned out that Bram Stoker had never properly seen to the U.S. rights for his novel, and so it was in the public domain. This meant that Florence Stoker never received her full payment for the American production from Liveright, who was no longer even alive by the end of the play's run.

Meanwhile, it turned out that much like a vampire itself, Nosferatu the film was not exactly dead. Somehow, there were prints that survived the court-ordered obliteration. One of these made it to America in 1929, and it was then that the film finally made its US debut, against Stoker's direct wishes, screening in New York and Detroit. And when budding Hollywood movie studio Universal, nearly a decade after the film's release, sought to make their own talkie adaptation of Dracula based on the stage play, they also studied Nosferatu closely, and the influence can be seen in their 1931 film version, also starring Lugosi.

Florence Anne Lemon Balcombe Stoker died in London on May 25, 1937 at the age of 78, survived by her son Irving Noel, granddaughter Ann Elizabeth, and newborn great-grandson Richard Noel. In her later years, she no doubt enjoyed greater financial prosperity thanks to the stage production of Dracula, as well as other licensed properties like Universal's film and it's 1936 sequel, Dracula's Daughter. It's unknown whether she was aware of Nosferatu's survival, or how she felt about it if she did know.

The film remained an obscurity for decades, playing here and there, but never being fully embraced by audiences. It finally reached a wider audience in the 1960s, when it found its way to late-night television, along with whatever other public domain films were available at the time. Renewed interest in the film finally led to the resurfacing in 1984 of a complete print--the first found since its attempted destruction nearly 60 years prior. The uncut version played at Berlin's Film Festival that year, a stone's throw from where it had debuted in 1922. Free at last from the shadow of Florence Stoker's wrath, Nosferatu took its rightful place as the seminal vampire film that it is. It was released to home video for the first time in 1992, and the 2007 DVD release is the very first home video version to include the original music, all original scenes, plus the original color film tints.

Florence Stoker and son Noel,
circa 1882.
Whatever its merits, justification, or lack thereof, Florence Stoker's crusade had failed in the end. Nosferatu the film, in true Dracula fashion, could not be completely destroyed. And it's thankful for us that it wasn't--for as horror scholar David J. Skal wrote in his 1990 book Hollywood Gothic: The Tangled Web of Dracula from Novel to Stage to Screen, "Nosferatu mined Dracula's metaphors and focused its meaning into visual poetry. It had achieved for the material what Florence Stoker herself would never achieve: artistic legitimacy."


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Ray Bradbury 1920-2012

"Ray Bradbury wrote three great novels and three hundred great stories. One of the latter was called 'A Sound of Thunder.' The sound I hear today is the thunder of a giant's footsteps fading away. But the novels and stories remain, in all their resonance and strange beauty." - Stephen King
"The landscape of the world we live in would have been diminished if we had not had him in our world." - Neil Gaiman

If you're a genre fan, chances are you've been reading a lot of obituaries of Ray Bradbury over the past few days since last Tuesday, June 5, when the titan of science fiction literature was taken from us at the age of 91. There can be no doubt that he was one of, if not the single greatest creator of speculative fiction produced by the 20th century, and along with the likes of Clarke, Asimov and Heinlein, one of the unassailable legends of the Golden Age of Science Fiction. And he was the last of them, which made his passing that much more painful.

I'm not going to cover all the ground that's been covered by so many others in the past week. For the purposes of this blog, I'm going to talk a little bit about Bradbury's ventures into the realm of horror in particular. Although best known for his sci-fi, the author did indeed also have a great love for its more visceral, emotion-based cousin genre. In fact, it was from the works of Edgar Allan Poe that a very young Bradbury was first opened up to the power of genre fiction while nurturing his love of reading in the public library of Waukegan, Illinois. Yet another defining moment was his parents taking him to see Lon Chaney in The Hunchback of Notre Dame as a small child.

Like Victor Hugo, Bradbury would also come to have his works adapted for the screen in later years--both big and small. Some of the more prominent adaptations would be derived from his works of horror--most notably the 1962 novel Something Wicked This Way Comes, which was turned into one of the most chilling horror films of the 1980s. But his relationship with the movies began even earlier, in 1953, and was connected with his horror dalliances more than anything else.

A scene directly inspired by Bradbury's short story.
It was in that year that not one, but two Bradbury-related projects would be brought to the movies. Both could be termed sci-fi horror, tying back into the writer's area of true expertise. The first would his film treatment, "Atomic Monster", which producer William Alland developed into the 3-D classic, It Came from Outer Space. A mere three weeks later, Bradbury's dear friend Ray Harryhausen would make a name for himself with the release of the seminal giant monster flick, The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, based loosely on Bradbury's 1951 short story, "The Fog Horn".

The Bradbury/Harryhausen friendship would become the stuff of genre legend (the two first met at the age of 18 at the home of none other than Forrest J. Ackerman), as would the sci-fi scribe's early association with comic strip icon Charles Addams. Before there was an Addams Family, Bradbury and Addams collaborated in the 1940s on a series of comically macabre stories revolving around a family called The Elliotts--collected in the 2001 volume, From the Dust Returned.

One of the EC issues featuring Bradbury's work.
In the early 1950s, more than 20 Bradbury stories would be adapted in the pages of EC Comics such as Tales from the Crypt and The Haunt of Fear. One short story in particular, "I Sing the Body Electric," would become the basis for the 100th episode of The Twilight Zone, aired in May 1962. He also directly wrote the screenplays for a total of five episodes of Alfred Hitchcock Presents.

Ray Bradbury was a shining light in the firmament of sci-fi, fantasy and horror. He was one of the last living connections to a truly amazing era in speculative fiction, and as The New York Times observed, may have been the one author most responsible for bringing science fiction into the mainstream. A giant of imaginative literature, he will be missed by fans of horror who have come to love and be inspired by his many fascinating forays into our genre.

 

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

VAULTCAST! Exclusive Interview w/Best-Selling Dark Fantasy & Paranormal Fiction Writer Leanna Renee Hieber!

About a year ago, I had the distinct pleasure of meeting one of the true rising stars of dark fantasy and paranormal fiction, novelist Leanna Renee Hieber, through a mutual friend, KT Grant of the superb blog Babbling About Books and More. Since then, I've wanted to have her as a guest in the Vaultcast, and I finally did so just a few weeks ago. The result is posted here for your enjoyment, and I apologize in advance for getting it posted so late. Alas, such is the dilemma of a hyper-busy Vault Keeper.

Known for her Strangely Beautiful series, which has already been optioned as a musical theatre production, Ms. Hieber is now launching a brand new series that is sure to soon be the talk of dark fantasy and gothic young adult fiction circles: Magic Most Foul. Steeped in a deep appreciation of history and literature, she is a genre writer who is refreshingly proud of being a genre writer, and it was a real treat speaking with her.

So listen in as we chat about her work, as well as various literary and cultural non-sequiturs along the way. You can either listen on the embedded player below, or proceed to the Vaultcast page and download it for listening at your leisure...



Pre-order signed copies of Darker Still: A Novel of Magic Most Foul!

Leanna Renee Hieber's website

Leanna Renee Hieber on Facebook

Leanna Renee Hieber on Twitter

Monday, February 7, 2011

Zombie Love Songs: You Are Tender

You Are Tender

You are tender,
You taste sweet,
I'll never let you go.
You have made my death complete,
And I'll eat you so.

You are tender,
You I bite,
All your screams stifled.
For my darling, I eat you
Until I get my fill.

You are tender
You taste strong,
I nibble on your heart.
For it's what I must consume,
And your other parts.

You are tender,
Death is near,
Let me eat your spine.
You'll be mine, so dry your tears,
Now it's undead time.

When at last your screams are through,
Darling don't be slow.
Zombie hordes will follow you
Everywhere you go.

(Taken from the pages of Michael P. Spradlin's Every Zombie Eats Somebody Sometime: A Book of Zombie Love Songs.)

Sunday, December 12, 2010

A Christmas Carol: Live from the Ghouls' Yule!

Last night, I had the pleasure of doing something I've never done before. As an old English major, it was something I had always wanted to do, and thanks to Captain Cruella's Ghouls' Yule, I finally got my wish. As the good Captain and I began to plan our Christmas/horror-themed event in the quaint village of Saugerties, New York, I decided to finally indulge my long-running wish. I volunteered to read passages from my very favorite holiday tale, Dickens' brilliant ghost story, A Christmas Carol. A story which perfectly combines the spirits of Christmas and of horror--both of which have long been dear to me.

Further, thanks to a timely suggestion from Bryan White of Cinema Suicide, I did more than just read for the live audience at The Inquiring Mind bookstore--I also engaged in a little experiment, broadcasting the reading live on the internet on UStream. It was my first time using the service, and I sincerely hope that some of you out there were actually able to view the live broadcast. But for those that didn't, I present it here. Enjoy, Merry Christmas... and God bless us, everyone!

(And please forgive the echo--it goes away after the first couple of minutes. As I said, first-time UStream user!)



Further Reading: My review of the classic 1951 film version of SCROOGE, over at Cinema Geek...

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Vault Exclusive! Interview with Estevan Vega, Author of Arson

If the path he's on is any indication, there may come a day when Estevan Vega is too big a deal to grant interviews to sites like this one. But at the moment, on his rise up the blood-soaked ladder of horror fiction success, I had a rare opportunity to sit down and speak with the young man, thanks to Vault contributor Marilyn Merlot, who first brought Vega to my attention and made this interview possible.

A fellow resident of the state of Connecticut, Vega has been writing since childhood, and in fact the work that would become his first published novel, Servant of the Realm, was begun at the age of 12. Since then, he has published the dark, psychological thriller The Sacred Sin, and the 21-year-old's third novel to date, Arson, published this past May. Find out more about Vega, Arson, and his other books at the author's official website.

What first inspired you to want to become a writer? Was horror always the genre you were interested in getting into?
My dad has been a huge inspiration for me. If it weren't for my father, Joe Vega, I wouldn't be a writer. He actually pulled me away from the television when I was in fifth grade and helped me write my first short story, which my teacher ended up giving me an A for. It was sick! I started to enjoy writing these stories, and the grades rocked. It was just awesome to have someone want to read something that I had written. So I decided to start writing a book. I thought, "Why not?" I have always flirted that line between horror and the supernatural. I really like doing that. When I go into a book or into a movie, I love that unsettled feeling right in your gut, so I try to emulate that in my writing. Am I horror? Hmmm... Am I real? Hmmm... Am I a writer who loves both and also gets stoked for the supernatural? Oh, yes!

What writers in particular did you look up to or enjoy reading and why?
Stephen King. He is kinda the guy to aim for as far as being a writer. I also really enjoyed stuff by Edgar Allen Poe and Ray Bradbury. I like Ted Dekker... he can write some eerie stuff sometimes. I try to get into a bunch of writers, because it allows me to get new concepts, try different perspectives and so on. Each writer has something to say, and it's cool to bounce around. But I always looked up to King. He's just accomplished so much in his lifetime. Oh, yeah...I'm jealous.

Talk about the genesis of your very first novel and how you got yourself published.
I started Servant of the Realm when I was 12. I had this crazy idea that I'd be famous by the time I hit prom. I was ridiculous. But I was set to change the world with my words. I ended up working on that, and a few drafts later had a book I wanted to actually see in print. So I just started submitting it places and published it with the first person to say they liked it. Maybe not the smartest choice, but you live and you learn, right? Since then it's been a crazy six years.

How useful has the internet been in growing a fan base and getting the word out?
Immensely important. The internet has helped me spread the word about myself using a website, Facebook, Twitter. I've also done interviews like this and with internet radio, and blog tours... none of that would be possible. It's allowed me to get people from around the country and around the world to hear about Arson and about me. It's been a sick tool in spreading the fire! Plus, email and the social networking sites allow me to connect directly with my readers in a way that just ten years ago might not have been possible.

What themes are important to you in your fiction?
Regret. Loss. Love. Fear. Redemption. All of my books deal with these in one way or another.

How would you say your latest book, Arson, is different from your previous work?
Very different but very similar. You can still tell it's me writing it, for those who've read either Servant of the Realm or The Sacred Sin. But the writing has just improved. I've learned a lot in the few years since my last book. I focused intensely on the characters in Arson, more so than I've ever done before. The people are far more important than the situations they face, though those situation do play a role in defining who they are. But I suppose where the three books stray from one another most would be the mood. It's a very slow burn kind of sensation that you'll get while reading Arson. One of those feelings that you're not sure why you're getting that way or where it's coming from, but it stays with you. It's real. I love that. Arson's also my first book to take place in Connecticut, which is cool.

What would you most compare it to? How would you describe it to someone who knew nothing about it?
It's been compared to Firestarter, Twilight, Jumper, Odd Thomas. A lot of people are really getting into it. If you haven't had a chance to check it out, you gotta. It's a cool story. Arson is basically a story about a boy who is trying to grow up. He's struggling with the pressures of maturity, but also coping with the fact that he can start fires with his mind. In some ways, it's a typical story about a boy who has a crush on the hot girl he can't get... but it goes so much deeper than that, it really does. It's got a bit for everybody: boy with superpowers, chick with a mask, psychotic grandmother, and a whole lot of family dysfunction.

Do you have any interest in your work being adapted into movies?
Are you serious? Of course. A few people have shown some interest, but I'm just waiting for the right deal. The book's only been out about 2 months, so I can wait for the phone to ring a bit more. But yeah, Arson would be a sick movie. I have always envisioned my books as movies.

What do you think of the state of horror fiction today?
I think it's a bit splintered. There are people still doing it and doing it well, but even King has broken off the beaten path some to explore other styles of writing, as Anne Rice has done, and I think that's great. Splintered is okay. I do think that horror can be experienced in many different ways, though. Something doesn't have to jump out and make you crap your pants in order to be horrifying, and that's the beauty of writing. You can literally horrify someone and not even be classified as a horror writer, but then you can spook someone only a little and everybody freaks out.

If you could give any advice to aspiring horror fiction writers, what would it be?
Just freakin' write. If you're passionate about something, it'll show. Study other writers. Know your competition and the market. Think about what terrifies you and see if you can make somebody else feel that same feeling. And... burn something.

Saturday, June 19, 2010

VAULTCAST: Exclusive Interview with Novelist Scott Sigler!

A couple of years ago, my dad introduced me to an outstanding new horror novel called Infected. Right off the bat, I became a Scott Sigler fan, and have been one ever since. And so, when he asked me a few weeks ago if I would share the trailer for his new novel, Ancestor, with my readers, not only did I jump at the opportunity, but I also went so far as to ask if he'd consent to an interview on the Vaultcast.

Scott agreed, and now I'm very pleased to share our conversation with you. We cover a lot of ground--from the influence of Stephen King and his trailblazing in the area of podcast publishing, to his fascination with disease-based horror and the possibility of cinematic adaptations. And of course, we also get into Ancestor, which hits bookstores on Tuesday, June 22. Take a listen below, or head to the Vaultcast page, where you can download it.




Get Ancestor now, right here.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Horror How-To Guides: A Joke That Doesn't Know When to Quit?

Typically, I find myself in the position of being a little too soft critically, for the most part. My usual position is liking something most others don't like; yet, one of the glaring exceptions was Max Brooks' Zombie Survival Guide, which I found to be a crashing bore, and most others seem to praise immeasurably. Loved World War Z, but Brooks' faux-DIY volume was a dreary, bone-dry, needlessly exhaustive affair that felt overlong at a mere 288 pages.

Upon starting Ritch Duncan and Bob Powers' The Werewolf's Guide to Life: A Manual for the Newly Bitten, I fully expected to have a much better time. And in the beginning, I did.

"To all those living with lycanthropy, this one's for you," reads the dedication. "Remember, take it one Moon at a time." And this tongue-in-cheek opening pretty much sets the tone for what is to come: A relatively lively and clever pseudo-guide for newly bitten werewolves and those close to them, with chapter headings like "When It Will Happen and What It Will Feel Like," "Home Is Where You Hang Your Restraints," "Romance and the Modern Lycanthrope" and "So You've Attacked Someone." Admittedly funny stuff--much moreso than Brooks' book.

However, The Werewolf's Guide to Life is kind of like one of those shaggy-dog stories that are really funny at first...then the laughter dies down to a chuckle...then just a polite smile...until you're sitting there just waiting for the person to finish, wondering how long it will go on for. You see, much like The Zombie Survival Guide, the whole thing is a clever joke, but one which doesn't quite know when to stop.

I love the idea behind The Werewolf's Guide to Life. Any book which introduces concepts like the mechanics of werewolf sex, or the best way to smuggle livestock onto your property, is going to get a positive reaction from me. However, it's a great idea that just doesn't translate well into a 236-page book. It would be much better served as a pamphlet or a booklet. Now I know the publishing industry kind of makes such a move both unfeasible and unwise, but that doesn't make the finished product any more readable.

Basically, it's a one-trick pony. The trick certainly has a lot of layers and nuance to it, but as a reader, I just had a hard time sitting through them all. Much like the point in The Zombie Survival where I started climbing the walls trying to get through a detailed explanation of firearms and their varying effects on the living dead, so too did I find myself twitching while reading about the pros and cons of suburbia vs. city life for the modern werewolf. The concept as a whole? Funny. The minutiae of the execution? Not so much.

To make myself clear, The Werewolf's Guide is a lot more entertaining than The Zombie Survival Guide, which is ironic since Max Brooks is the son of the one and only Mel Brooks, and a former SNL writer. Nevertheless, Ritch Duncan & Bob Powers are not exactly slouches--both men are accomplished comedians and comic writers. Duncan has worked as a standup, and also wrote for SNL, as well as shows like The Late, Late Show with Craig Kilborn, and Tough Crowd with Colin Quinn (he was also the author of the 2004-05 blog "What Is Happening to Me?"--the first-person story of a new werewolf that was something of an inspiration for The Werewolf's Guide.) And Powers has experience in the realm of "fake how-to" books, with acclaimed tomes such as Happy Cruelty Day! and the Just Make a Choice! series.

I even had the opportunity to see a presentation on Jaws & Jaws 2 given by Duncan (pictured) at Kevin Geeks Out About Sharks, and it was hilarious. No doubt about it, these guys are funny. But even they can't keep the laughs going with such a thin premise, and it really starts to get tedious after about 100 pages. Interestingly, the most consistently amusing aspect of the book turned out to be the illustrations by New Yorker cartoonist Emily Flake, which were far more funny and ludicrous than the dryly demonstrative illos in The Zombie Survival Guide.

The Werewolf's Guide to Life is the kind of a book that is just cool for being what it is, and you can get a kick out of owning it and proudly displaying it, like a novelty item that makes for good conversation at parties. But I just can't recommend reading it all the way through, unless you actually are a werewolf in need of some guidance. Then, by all means, go to town.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Watch the Trailer for the New Scott Sigler Novel, Ancestor!

Novelist Scott Sigler has a new book in the works, and was kind enough to pass along the new trailer for it--which, impressively enough, he made himself. As Stacie Ponder pointed out in her own coverage, it's surreal enough that big novels actually get their own trailers these days. But for the author to make it himself? That's some gusto, right there. This kid's a real go-getter, and he's gonna go far.

Wait, what am I saying? He already has. Sigler, as many of you know, is the author of the highly successful Infected (2007), and its sequel Contagious (2008). Those two were originally published in 2007 as two of the world's first podcast-only novels, and then later reached print. Interestingly enough, Sigler's new novel, Ancestor, was first released in podcast form before either of those two. But on June 22, a hardcover edition will finally be available.

It's a tale of genetic engineering gone wrong, of scientists out to breed an animal ripe for organ harvesting, only to have the whole thing blow up in their faces when the creature they create doesn't turn out to be as controllable as they anticipated. Check out the aforementioned trailer for yourself:



Pretty nifty, no? And with a cameo by the author himself, no less. For more on Sigler and his fiction, jump to his website. Also, Scott has agreed to an interview right here in the Vault next week, so keep an eye out!

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

"Heck" Adapted for the Silver Screen

By Paige MacGregor

The film will be adapted for the screen by Spyglass Entertainment, the production company behind other kid-friendly features such as Stick It, 27 Dresses and The Pacifier. The story will follow Milton and his sister to Heck, where they meet a boy named Virgil who has a map of the Nine Circles of Heck. Together, the youngsters plan their escape from the underworld and the principal of Heck, Bea “Elsa” Bubb.

According to Spyglass Entertainment reps, the company wants the Heck adaptation to be a big, “effects-driven family adventure in the vein of Beetlejuice”, the popular 1988 horror comedy starring Michael Keaton, Geena Davis, Alec Baldwin and Winona Ryder. Director Juan Jose Campanella (whose foreign-language film, The Secret in Their Eyes, took home the Oscar this year) is set to direct the Heck adaptation. Reportedly, Campanella’s work is a testament to his dark side—along with an obsession with the color red—that seems to hold great potential for a film like Heck.

I don’t know a lot about Juan Jose Campanella—although I plan to take a look at his recent Oscar-winning film in the very near future—but I’m still very excited about this cinematic adaptation. Not to mention the outrage and anger that will be incited among parents who say that the film glorifies death or some other ridiculous thing.

For more information on Dale E. Basye’s book series, head over to the series’ official Web site. The film project is currently in development, so unless you have an IMDbPro account you won’t find much on the IMDb site, but we’ll keep our eyes peeled for updates on the film and an official web site.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Visceral Visionaries: Ash Arceneaux

It's not often you come across a talent who is prolific in both visual arts and the written word--not to mention various forms of visual media. But Ash Arceneaux is one of those talents. I was pleased to recently come across her work at deviantART, and even more pleased that she consented to discuss it for a bit on The Vault of Horror.

In addition to being an artist, you're also a writer of supernatural thrillers, among other things, under the pen name Adra Steia. What led you to this? Is the writing what eventually led you to the visual arts?

I’ve been a writer since I figured out how to hold a pencil. My mom still has bedsheets I scribbled my ‘story’ on when I was a toddler! I’ve always had a fascination with the darker side of things, although it was more of an interest in human reaction to these horrible things than in the monsters or murders or whatever. As for the writing leading me to art, mainly no, but a little bit yes. Just as I’ve been writing since I was a kid, I’ve been drawing. Both are ingrained parts of me, and I couldn’t be who I am without one or the other.

What is more difficult in your opinion?
Writing. With art, you can just go on a whim and turn a mistake into part of the picture. You can visually show your emotions, your themes, your ideas, without having to worry about grammar and technical stuff and the bane of a writer’s existence: ‘telling’ instead of ‘showing’. And I can turn out a new art piece in a day or so, and it takes months to write a book, weeks to edit it, years to sell it, and years to see the financial investment!

I find it interesting that you've done both illustration and photo-based work. Was that a conscious decision? Which do you prefer?
Before I discovered digital media about four years ago, the only way I knew how to do any sort of artwork was with a pencil. A friend of mine introduced me to a graphics program, and I was hooked. I love both traditional and digital, but I have to say I prefer Photoshop to a pencil. My skills with pens and pencils and paints are so limited in comparison to what I can do with Photoshop!

I ask this question of everyone, but what led you to want to explore these more visually disturbing themes in your work? Why not just paint happy trees and mountains like Bob Ross?
Twisted childhood, of course. Lots of issues with abandonment and rejection, and my upbringing in a pastor’s household. I fully embrace my religious beliefs, but I like to explore those taboo boundaries of death, evil and sin. In fiction, there’s something about imagining the emotional responses during a situation where a person has no control, little hope, and little chance of survival. In art, it’s like peeling off the masks of our happy little lives and showing what’s truly underneath. Each of my latest pieces has a theme behind it.

Who are some of your inspirations?
Edvard Munch, Dali, Van Gogh, and so many artists on deviantART: Decreptitude, Grandeombre, Vyrl, Bill Tackett, and the list grows every day.

I notice you've designed some book covers and jackets. How did you get into that, and how would you describe it as an outlet for visual artists now, as compared to in the past?
It is an extremely relevant art form, and outlet, for visual artists. In many ways, digital art and digital art design is the future of art. We’re quickly becoming a paperless society. While traditional media will always have a place, the ability to create art digitally will soon be a necessity.
When my first novel, Swamp Baby, was in queue for design, a friend of mine happened to get the assignment. She involved me in the entire design process (which authors rarely get much say in). Until then, I had no idea [of the technical process of] how a book got its cover. I started playing with digital production, and as soon as I was confident in my skills, I started applying with small presses and magazines. It’s a job I absolutely love.

You've also created designs that have appeared on bags, as jewelry, and even in tattoo form. Tell me a little about that.
I’m manic about creating. I get the urge to make something, and I use what I have at hand. I love painting on clothes, bags, and shoes. I don’t have the organizational and planning skills required for jewelry making, so that was a one-time thing. As for tattoo art, tattoos are my third passion. I absolutely love a well-done tattoo, and I’ve been thrilled to design art for friends and the occasional complete stranger.

Of what work are you most proud, and why?
This is a hard question to answer! While I can say I’m most proud of my cover art, I can’t really narrow it down to just one cover, although the ones I’ve done for Damnation Books are very high on my list of favorites. I’ve done some that make me want to hide under a table somewhere and cry from shame (in my defense, it’s what the author wanted, and when a newbie author has their heart set on *insert crap here* then that’s what they’ll get). I can honestly say I feel like I’m good enough at my job to turn just about any outrageous request into a decent cover (ex: http://asharceneaux.deviantart.com/art/ruling-Eden-cover-139138725).

Are you still studying art at the moment? How would you describe that experience, and how has it altered your work compared to what it would be like without the formal training?
I’m a horrible student. Hence the reason I’m a four-time college dropout. I dropped out of art school last year after failing math (math? For an art degree? Ugh…) and enrolled in my local community college. While I learned a lot in three years of art school, I think I’ve learned twice as much in the art program I’m in now, in just a fraction of the time. I never thought an artist needed to go to school to learn what comes naturally, but now that I’ve done it, I see the marked improvements in my work. If anything, a professor challenging your self-taught methods and showing you their techniques opens your mind to new ways.

When it comes to horror themes in art, do you feel that women bring a different perspective to the work than men, and if so, how? Or is that too much of a generalization?
It is a little bit of a generalization, but one I think I can answer. I think art is one of the few areas where men and women are on fairly equal footing. An artist can feasibly remain gender-anonymous until they choose to reveal themselves. I managed to hide my gender identity for the first two years of my art career. I didn’t really promote a lot of my artwork and I conducted most of my business via the Internet. It wasn’t until I ‘came out’ at a convention that people (who didn’t know me personally) put a woman’s face to 'ash’s' work.
Women bring something new to the table in regards to horror art. Women aren’t scared of blood and the emotional aspects of horror. I can’t speak for every female artist, but the female artists I respect and admire aren’t afraid to dig deep into the emotional viscera of art, and sometimes what they unearth can be deeply disturbing.

What are some upcoming projects people can look forward to? Any more fiction on the horizon?
As for art, I’m working on a bunch of new pieces, all fitting into either my feminism themes or my ‘gothic romance’ theme. I expect to have them in my gallery over the next few weeks, and for sale by summer. I’ve got a couple of new projects just getting off the ground. I’ll be attending the Romantic Times Convention at the end of April in Columbus, Ohio, CONtext in Columbus in August, and Authors After Dark convention in New Jersey in September. I’ll have dealer tables at the August and September conventions, so check me out, and if you’re in the area, come see me!

Monday, March 29, 2010

Bram Stoker Award Winners Announced!

I'd like to take some time out from the regularly scheduled programming here to recognize the winners of the illustrious Bram Stoker Awards, the premiere accolade in horror fiction the world over. True to the international spirit, the awards were presented yesterday outside North America for the very first time--at the World Horror Convention in Brighton, England, to be exact.

So, without further ado, here are the 2010 honorees:
  • Novel: Audrey’s Door by Sarah Langan
  • First Novel: Damnable by Hank Schwaeble
  • Long Fiction: The Lucid Dreaming by Lisa Morton
  • Short Fiction: “In the Porches of My Ears” by Norman Prentiss (Post-Scripts #18)
  • Collection: A Taste of Tenderloin by Gene O’Neill
  • Anthology: He is Legend edited by Christopher Conlon
  • Non-Fiction: Writers Workshop of Horror edited by Michael Knost
  • Poetry: Chimeric Machines by Lucy Snyder
Great to see Sarah Langan, a relative newcomer, snag another Stoker for her fourth novel. This is her second Stoker, as she previously won in 2007 for The Missing. She also contributed to last year's winner for Best Anthology, Unspeakable Horror--a volume put together by LoTT-D members Chad Helder and Vince Liaguno.

Speaking of anthologies, Christopher Conlon's winner is a tribute to the great Richard Matheson, containing original stories by some great writers like Joe Hill and others. And that Writer's Workshop of Horror is a fine little volume for those looking to break into horror fiction, worth checking out for sure.

The Bram Stoker Awards are presented every year since 1987 by the Horror Writers Association of America. And no, my first short story was not nominated... Oh well, gives me something to strive for with the next one!

* * * * * * * * * *

In other random developments, please be sure to check out my guest review of Dead Snow over at Day of the Woman! And I would be remiss if I did not give another plug for the Rondo Hatton Awards--voting ends Saturday night, so get those ballots in!

Saturday, February 13, 2010

VAULT VLOG: Unearthed! Horror Fiction from a Teenage B-Sol!



As promised, below are some actual images from my infamous "self-published" 1987 tome, The Tower of London, including the cover and some interior pages. Click for an enlarged view. Look upon them and despair...




Friday, February 5, 2010

Psycho Semi-Centennial: The Man Behind the Madman

Were it not for H.P. Lovecraft, Psycho might never have come into existence. Yes, despite Lovecraft's brand of horror being the complete opposite of what Psycho represents, the godfather of the weird and supernatural can take some credit for it's existence. This is due to his mentoring of the man who wrote the novel on which the film was based: Robert Bloch.

In the early 1930s, the teenaged Robert Bloch was an avid reader of the venerable horror pulp Weird Tales, and Howard Phillips Lovecraft was his favorite contributor by far. The youngster began a letter correspondence with the legendary author, who would later encourage his own burgeoning writing efforts. HPL even featured his enthusiastic fan as a character ("Robert Blake") in his short story "The Haunter of the Dark" (he killed him off in it.) And when Bloch made his first fiction sales at the age of 17 ("The Feast in the Abbey" and "The Secret in the Tomb"), they were to Weird Tales, where his work could appear alongside that of his idol.

By the time Lovecraft passed away in 1937, his young protege was well on the way to succeeding him as America's most gifted horror storyteller. At first, his stuff was heavily Lovecraftian in tone. Yet much later, his most famous work would be nothing like anything Lovecraft would've ever put to paper.

Robert Albert Bloch was born April 5, 1917 in Chicago, Illinois, the son of bank cashier Ray Bloch and his wife Stella Loeb, a social worker. He took to reading tales of the bizarre and fantastic from a young age, and soon began writing some on his own. Genre fiction would always be his great love, and his immense body of work would eventually come to include sci-fi, horror, mystery and crime.

Following Lovecraft's death, Bloch continued writing for Weird Tales, and also started contributing to lots of other pulps, including Amazing Stories. He wrote several tales within Lovecraft's own Cthulhu Mythos. Yet by the 1940s, he had begun experimenting with a different kind of horror from that of his mentor, weaving in elements of crime fiction to create a series of stories based on the cases of Jack the Ripper, the Marquis de Sade, Lizzie Borden and others.

As his career blossomed in the 1950s, Bloch became a major force in the world of genre fandom as it then existed. He was a prolific writer, authoring 29 novels (beginning with 1946's The Scarf) and countless short stories that appeared in magazines and anthologies. He would eventually capture the Hugo award, the Bram Stoker award and the World Fantasy award for his writing, and serve as president of the Mystery Writers of America.

Bloch also branched out into the world of filmed entertainment, crafting screenplays and contributing stories that would be used on TV and in the movies. He wrote scripts for the Boris Karloff-hosted horror TV anthology Thriller, and penned the scripts for the classic Star Trek episodes "Catspaw", "What Are Little Girls Made Of?" and "Wolf in the Fold" (which dealt with Jack the Ripper). His stories also inspired movies like William Castle's The Night Walker (1964), Strait-Jacket (1964), The House That Dripped Blood (1970) and Asylum (1972).

Yet it would be Bloch's first adapted story that would become by far his most famous, and forever enshrine him in the pantheon of iconic horror wordsmiths. It began as a kernel of an idea in his 1957 short story "The Really Bad Friend", which appeared in the pages of Mike Shayne Mystery Magazine. Then, in 1959 he wrote the novel Psycho, based loosely on the real-life case of another famous murderer, Ed Gein.

Psycho was the ultimate development of the approach Bloch had been developing for over a decade. It was a different kind of horror story, taking place in modern urban and suburban settings, with contemporary characters, and dealing with situations based in reality, instead of the supernatural. Yet this was no crime or detective story, as previous tales of this type had been--Psycho was a horror novel, of a very different kind.

And just as it was a landmark in horror fiction, it would be adapted in 1960 by screenwriter Joseph Stefano into something that would have just as groundbreaking an effect on horror film, if not even more so. As directed by Alfred Hitchcock, Bloch's novel became one of the most well-known horror stories of all time, and his character Norman Bates--though very different from the character as presented by Bloch--would be immortalized as horror's first thoroughly modern movie "monster", and the prototype of the movie slasher.

Bloch enjoyed great notoriety from the success of Psycho, and his profile in the world of horror fandom was certainly raised to dizzying heights. He would take part in the founding of the Horror Writers Association (HWA) of America. He continued writing prolifically, evening penning two sequel novels to Psycho (unrelated to the movie sequels) in 1982 and 1990.

In 1994, the 35th anniversary edition of the novel Psycho was published--a run of merely 500 copies, all autographed by Bloch. Mere months later, on September 23, 1994 Robert Bloch passed away in Los Angeles, California at the age of 77.

Just as his mentor had done some 30 years earlier with his stories in Weird Tales, so did Bloch revolutionize the horror genre with Psycho. For all his vast body of work, Robert Bloch will forever be identified by far with his 1959 novel, and rightfully so. It stands with the likes of The Maltese Falcon, Lord of the Rings and 1984 as one of the 20th century's most important genre novels.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Exclusive Interview: Author and Film Buff Ron Hogan Talks '70s Horror

I've mentioned it on here before, but Ron Hogan's The Stewardess Is Flying the Plane is one of my favorite books on cinema, in no small part because it deals with my favorite era in cinema, the 1970s. Hogan is an influential force in the literary blogosphere, having founded the groundbreaking book website/blog Beatrice.com in 1995, and currently earning his keep as director of e-marketing strategy for Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Mr. Hogan was recently kind enough to sit down and answer some questions I posed to him about the movie era we both love so much, the '70s. In particular, given the nature of this blog, I thought it might be a worthy idea to focus on the horror films of the '70s in particular. I'll always have a soft spot for that decade in horror filmmaking, and having read Mr. Hogan's book, I figured he'd have a lot of interesting things to say on the topic. Turns out, I was right.

I happen to be a big fan of the '70s era of film in general, which is what attracted me to your book. What is it about that decade that really distinguishes it in cinema history, and made you want to focus on it in the first place?
I was inspired by Peter Biskind's Easy Riders, Raging Bulls--basically, if that book was about a handful of directors who transformed Hollywood, I wanted to know, well, what did the rest of
Hollywood end up looking like? And it turns out to be a quite fascinating period: The studios' motives for hiring young directors like Altman, Bogdanovich and Coppola may have been largely financial, but they (and many others like them) played an important part in making the counterculture of the late 1960s the mainstream culture of the 1970s.

You devote a chapter in your book to the horror genre. What place do you feel it had in that whole era? What part did it play? How would you characterize the effect on the genre caused by the new-found freedom of this era in terms of what you could get away with depicting?
The elimination of the Production Code in the late 1960s is absolutely essential to horror's development in the 1970s, and you see a lot of envelope-pushing throughout the decade, as filmmakers see just how explicit they can make scenes. You only have to look at the use of
tension and indirection in, say, a Val Lewton-produced film of the 1940s like Cat People, then compare it to the spectacular gory deaths of The Omen and Damien: Omen II to see the shift in emphasis.
Horror tends to take a back seat in most considerations of 1970s film; it's not a genre of Academy-recognized serious message films, nor a genre of all-access blockbusters like Star Wars or Jaws. But it was a consistently popular genre--look at how many horror films from the
1970s have been remade in the last decade, and you'll understand how these films wedged themselves into our popular imagination.

What would you say are the most important horror films of the era and why? How about the most important directors?
Most of my answers are the fairly obvious ones: Rosemary's Baby and The Exorcist for pushing horror into the mainstream, directors like George Romero and Tobe Hooper for their maverick ambitions. I would like to see greater recognition for Larry Cohen--God Told Me To is
one of the most unsettling films of the entire decade.
And although it's a TV-movie, Steven Spielberg's Duel reminds us that he learned a lot about cinematic storytelling from horror movies, and what he learned about pacing and tension is used to masterful effect later on in the decade in Jaws and Close Encounters.

Do you think there was still a stigma at that time with regards to horror, or was it becoming more mainstream?
Probably a bit of both, actually: Horror WAS becoming more mainstream, but there was still a critical stigma attached to the genre, not least of all because it was one that was frequently imitated on the cheap. (Which is the same reason it took blaxploitation films, for example,
to gain enduring respect as anything more than time-period artifacts.)

What was it that led so many filmmakers to explore such intense and disturbing themes at this point in movie history? What kind of an effect, if any, would you say that horror cinema had on non-horror film during the 1970s? Taxi Driver, for example, almost feels like a horror film at times!
It was an intense and disturbing time in American history, that's the main thing--and, as I mentioned earlier, the removal of the Production Code meant that filmmakers could be more explicit, whatever they were trying to say, and they didn't have to tack on a moralistic or happy ending to make everything alright in the final reel. The pervasive loss of faith in major institutions, from the government on down, plays perfectly into horror's unsettling of the normal world, and vice versa. The visual tropes of horror were a perfect mirror for the psychological fear and uncertainty of 1970s America.

Let's talk about The Exorcist. Most consider it the finest horror film of this era (or perhaps any). Would you agree, and why do you think this opinion is so commonly held? I'd agree, because William Friedkin, working off the William Peter Blatty screenplay, works from fundamental premises: We care about the film because we care about the characters. Father Damien's crisis of faith matters to us; the visual spectacles of Regan's torment resonate more because we've come to recognize her as a character, not simply a victim of horror pyrotechnics. The film isn't a roller-coaster ride through a series of horrific set-pieces; it's a serious story that
happens to have horrific elements perfectly integrated into its emotional core.

Why was Satanism such a prevalent theme in 1970s horror?
Again, the removal of the Production Code explains a lot, but it's also worth noting the general apocalyptic tone of the Cold War era was an effective breeding ground for a "God vs. Satan" mythology. Throw in a tireless self-promoter like Anton LaVey pressing at the fringes of
Hollywood society, and the rise of explicit Satanism as a metaphor for the pervasive corruption of American society becomes a lot clearer.

Whats your opinion on the slasher phenomenon, and why do you think it arose at that particular point in time with a movie like Halloween?
When I mentioned horror films as "a roller-coaster ride through a series of horrific set-pieces" up above, I had the worst knock-offs of the slasher film in mind. Not so much Halloween--which, like most of John Carpenter's work in this period, is a testament to what a determined filmmaker can achieve on a limited budget--but dozens of films that came afterwards, where everybody comes into the theater not only knowing they're going to see a string of brutal murders, but
cheering for them. To me, I'm not even sure that's really horror--more like bread and circuses.

How would you compare the horror of the 1970s, in terms of what came after, in the 1980s and 1990s? It seems to me they became a bit more light-hearted in the '80s, and then much tamer in the '90s.
That sounds about right to me--I didn't watch much horror in the 1990s, but I firmly remember the increasing ridiculousness of '80s horror, particularly the franchises where, as I complained above, a bunch of cardboard cutouts get killed in visually extravagant ways and then maybe evil gets pushed back into its box at the end or maybe it slinks away to kill another day.

Any future projects you might want to let my readers know about?
I've been thinking a lot about action films lately...

I want to thank Ron Hogan for taking some time out to discuss one of my favorite topics. I hope you enjoyed our little talk, and if you're a fan of 1970s film in general, I encourage you to have a look at The Stewardess Is Flying the Plane. You can also follow Ron on Twitter here.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...