Showing posts with label SIGHT AND SOUND. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SIGHT AND SOUND. Show all posts

Thursday, December 1, 2022

A TRIP TO ALPHAVILLE


In a recent post, I named Carlos Claren's AN ILLUSTRATED HISTORY OF THE HORROR FILM as one of my recommended essential books. Two of the last photos in the book were of recently-deceased French-Swiss director's Jean-Luc Godard's ALPHAVILLE (1965). They perplexed my young mind as I had never heard of it.

Godard (3 December 1930 – 13 September 2022) was one of France's "new wave" filmmakers of the 1960's and ALPHAVILLE was a visual study of pop art and a comic strip plot wrapped up in dystopian and film noir themes. Eddie Constantine as Lemmy Caution plays a secret agent who is sent to the futuristic city to destroy the computer that runs it and embarks on his mission amid the dark streets of Paris.

This article from SIGHT & SOUND (October, 1965) discusses Godard's film just a few months after it was released.



Saturday, November 19, 2022

CARL DREYER'S VAMPYR REVISITED


Back in 2008 I purchased the Criterion Collection's release of Carl Dreyer's 1932 film, VAMPYR. While I have no specific reason, I didn't seem to have the inclination to watch it until recently. I had seen a version of it years ago and remembered that it was a pretty strange movie. I'm glad I finally gave it another view, and yes, it's quite strange, but in a very fascinating way.

Danish director Carl Theodor Dreyer (3 February 1889 – 20 March 1968), after having made THE PASSION OF JOAN OF ARC (1928), one of the most critically acclaimed films of the silent era, thought he would capitalize on the commercially burgeoning genre of supernatural films (they weren't popularly known as "horror" films quite yet). He decided on using Irish writer, J. Sheridan LeFanu's 1871 book of weird tales, "In A Glass Darkly" for his inspiration. He co-wrote the script with fellow Dane, Christen Jul, and the resulting work bore little resemblance to the book he derived his idea from. Instead, except for a few references (like "Carmilla", the vampire is a woman, albeit an ancient hag), the story seems wholly original.

Completed in 1931, the film's distributor, UFA, perhaps unwisely decided to hold back on its premiere thinking it would be overshadowed by the soon-to-be released DRACULA from Universal. Whether not appearing before it would have had any more significant influence on the history of the vampire film is difficult to assess. In any event, when VAMPYR premiered in Germany, it was largely panned by audiences. Unusual film cuts, tracking camera shots and the general ambiguity of many scenes and images left viewers scratching their heads. The same happened on its premiere in France.

Nevertheless, like many other films from the era, it has become more welcoming by film critics and historians. VAMPYR (aka, THE STRANGE ADVENTURE OF ALLAN/DAVID GRAY) is a singular movie; odd, and in many ways, inexplicable, it is visually captivating despite its ambiguities and its overall effect is heavily dreamlike and atmospheric.

Following are articles and photos from the film.

Original poster concept art.

French film poster.


Rare German lobby cards.


The demise of the vampire's accomplice.

Allan Gray sees his own corpse in a dream sequence,

Article from CLOSEUP, March 1931.





Article from SIGHT AND SOUND, October 1965.





Monday, November 14, 2022

CRONENBERG SHRINKS SOME HEADS


Canadian director David Cronenberg is the Godfather of Body Horror and he's got the films to prove it. From SHIVERS (1975) to remake of THE FLY (1986), Cronenberg has horrified and nauseated audiences with his special brand of visceral horror.

Sometimes, though, he varies from the genre and makes other films. In this article from the March, 2012 issue of SIGHT AND SOUND, Cronenberg is interviewed regarding his previous year's film, A DANGEROUS METHOD, about the relationship between Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung and one of the first female psychoanalysts. Included is an article on his film, VIDEODROME (1983).





Saturday, April 23, 2022

THE OTHER NOSFERATU, TOO


This insightful article by Beverly Walker from the Autumn, 1978 issue of the UK film magazine, SIGHT AND SOUND, offers a behind-the-scenes look at the making of Werner Herzog's NOSFERATU THE VAMPYRE, the remake of F.W. Murnau's 1922 silent film, NOSFERATU. The author plays a role in the movie, and as a result has some interesting things to say about this remarkable film.





Monday, March 28, 2022

FOLK HORROR REVIVAL


You know from past posts here that I am a vocal proponent for folk horror films. The sub-genre is elusive and insinuates itself in many ways into the context of many movies.

This article explains the phenomenon and how it recently re-emerged in popularity.

A scene from the film, Midsommar.

We Are Going Through a Folk Horror Renaissance
It’s like cottagecore, but with murder. 
October 29, 2021 | nofilmschool.com

There is a chill in the air as you spot animal skulls hanging in the trees and the sound of many quiet voices calling for you in the still woods. The night is falling, and whoever is watching you doesn’t want you to leave. This impending threat is quite normal in one of the most chilling subgenres of horror out there: folk horror.

Folk horror is a subgenre that achieved a spot in the general public in 2010 after the BBC Four documentary, A History of Horror, used the term to describe a series of nihilistic British genre films focused on the occult, paganism, and ritualistic sacrifice in a rural landscape. Since the term’s debut, the subgenre has expanded to include a multitude of offerings from suffocating silence to samurai ghosts. 

In recent years, the folk horror genre seems to be going through a renaissance with slow-burner hits like Midsommar. Let’s see how folk horror came to be, and how it has found a revival in modern-day cinema. 

What is folk horror? 
While most of the horror genre focuses on the horrors of people, folk horror finds its roots in the land. It is difficult to convey the form that specifically makes a folk horror film, but the emphasis on the evil that has seeped into the soil, the terror of the unkempt woods and forgotten lanes, the ghosts that haunt stones and patches of dark waters are key factors in the subgenre. 

Folk horror takes the romantic notion of the natural world as a restorative, tranquil paradise and releases the dark potential of the landscape. The woods are hostile, with the earth filled with bones of the past. The seclusion becomes maddening as the mind is filled with local legends, myths, and old-world beliefs. Viewers have conditioned themselves to not judge those who are different from our modern lifestyle and put down their guard to welcome the beauty of nature, but once that guard is down, the dark underlayer releases its violence. 

The unholy trinity of folk horror
As Adam Scovell states in his article for BFI, there is a trilogy of British films made with various ideas of the counter-culture era fueled by the flower-powered highs of the 60s and the dying optimism in the mid-70s. 

The first of the trilogy, and possibly the most nihilistic of the three, is Micheal Reeves’s Witchfinder General. The film is a disturbing tale that follows a Puritan Witchfinder General, Matthew Hopkins, as he is empowered to travel the countryside to collect a fee for each witch he extracts a confession from during the English Civil War. The film shows a sadistic and cynical view of Puritanical efforts to purify the earth by dismembering those who are deemed wicked. 

The second film is Piers Haggard’s The Blood on Satan’s Claws, followed by the more optimistic of the three, Robin Hardy’s The Wicker Man.

These unholy three defined the subgenre by emphasizing the natural landscape which isolates its communities and those within those communities. They also focused on the skewed moral and theological system that causes violence, human sacrifice, torture, and even demonic and supernatural summoning. By unearthing the darker side of cult-like communities and the occult, these three films would set the groundwork for what elements made up the folk horror genre. 

The revival of the genre
There has been a recent boom in the folk horror genre. This recent wave of folk horror is largely due to people’s longing for a way to escape technology and the pressures and emptiness of everyday life. The feeling was more present than ever during the COVID-19 pandemic which left people searching for a way of escapism through the cottage-core aesthetic. 

The subgenre is fixated on history and tradition, and placing purpose on a communities’ or individual's actions can bring a sense of comfort to the viewers. The viewer begins searching for familiarity in their own daily lives once they realize that they could never survive in the situations characters find themselves in in folk horror films. 

It is also our fascination with the occult or cult-like communities that draw us into these bizarre worlds. We find ourselves deeply invested in stories of terror as the characters try to find a sense of happiness in pastoral life. 

Modern-day folk horror still focuses on the darkness of the land, isolation, and the creatures that lurk in the forest, but these films also try to create empathy toward those who are suffering and find comfort in their found community.

Some of the defining movies in the revival of the subgenre include Ari Aster’s Midsommar, Robert Eggers’ The Witch and The Lighthouse, Lamb, It Comes At Night, The Wailing, and Kill List. The bizarre surrealism and otherworldliness of the films keep us just at the edge of fully understanding how the world of the film functions, requiring the watcher to fully immerse themselves into the film for the entirety of its run time. 

Many of these films are inspired by folklore, myths, and customs that directly contrast our digital world. The modern-day folk horror films heavily focus on the distant relationship humans have with nature and the greed that consumes us when we do interact with the land. Some people may be looking at the land as a thesis statement to help them graduate or provide a new life or job that rewards them for taking care of the land. How the humans in the story interact with the land will ultimately lead to their deaths or rebirths.

Sure, some of these modern-day folk horror films are not necessarily terrifying, but they break down the audience's expectations to tell a much larger story that relies heavily on the relationship between humans and nature.  

With production companies like A24 dominating the folk horror landscape, there is good reason to believe that folk horror is going through a revival. More and more people find themselves connected to the characters in folk horror. It encourages audiences to not isolate themselves in the woods or on an island away from society. Sometimes, isolation can be nice, but allowing that dread to consume you is a whole other monster. 

Folk horror will continue to flourish, as it is one of those subgenres that allow filmmakers with any budget to create beautifully terrifying projects that feed off of a very prevalent escapist fantasy. All you need is a camera, a character, any isolated location, and a menacing presence that allows the main character to achieve their emotional arc. Combine all those elements, and you'll have a pretty darn good folk horror film in your hands.

* * *
Honestly, I had to look up the term, "cottagecore", and here's what I found: "Cottagecore, also known as farmcore and countrycore, is inspired by a romanticized interpretation of western agricultural life. It is centered on ideas of simple living and harmony with nature".

The release of the 2015 film, THE VVITCH was Robert Eggers' directorial debut and it was critically acclaimed. This review is from the April, 2016 issue of SIGHT AND SOUND.



Saturday, August 21, 2021

THE LEGEND OF THE VIDEO NASTIES


The 1980's were a great time for watching horror films on video. Many of the classics were finding their way on tape, as well tons of B-movies, including those that became known as "video nasties". This phenomenon originated in the UK, but also found its way to the States. A total of 72 of these videos were "banned" in Britain and subject to confiscation. The reason? Well, violence and gore, of course! Many of these films poured on the blood and guts by the bucketful, and the more grislier the movie it seemed, the more rentals it got. Even Siskel and Ebert got in on the action with their take on the craze (see below).

The fake documentary, FACES OF DEATH (1978) was probably the most notorious with CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST (1980) not far behind. The website, IMDB has a list of the 72 movies, along with capsule summaries and whether the film was prosecuted for obscenity or not.

The following article is from the UK's June, 2021 SIGHT AND SOUND magazine and chronicles the legend of the video nasty.