Showing posts with label Civil Union. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil Union. Show all posts

Thursday, October 22, 2020

Bobservations

First story: as we inch toward Halloween I would like to share the three scariest words in my life; it’s Carlos saying:

“I … was … thinking … ”

Shivers.

Second story: because we are such true romantics, we decided that the 20th anniversary gift is garden equipment, so we bought a new lawn mower.

Who said romance is dead? Not me!

If you were looking for a good reason to vote, Tuxedo says you should think of it like this:

I am dying over here because my favorite serial killer is coming back to TV.

Showtime has announced that Dexter will be back next year, with star Michael C. Hall, for 10 new episodes.

I’m here for the Bay Harbor Butcher again.

Merriam-Webster dictionary has changed “sexual preference” to be an “offensive” term  after SCOTUS nominee Amy Coney Barrett used the term—twice—and didn’t acknowledge it, or faux-pologize, until Senator Mazie Hirono took her to task for it; the dictionary says:

“The term preference as used to refer to sexual orientation is widely considered offensive in its implied suggestion that a person can choose who they are sexually or romantically attracted to.”

Merriam-Webster confirmed the change was made because of Barrett’s homophobia.

It’s not just ReTHUGlicans who are despicable, sometime Democrats are just as asshatted.

Last week Georgia state Representative Vernon Jones, a conservative MAGAt-loving, _____-supporting Democrat, crowdsurfed over a packed, mostly maskless crowd at ______’s superspreader rally in Macon.

Again, I don’t wish the virus on anyone, but if Jones were to come down with COVID-19 I might not really care.

From the Stupid File comes ______, who warned a crowd at a Corona-palooza rally in Nevada that Joe Biden would “listen to the scientists” if elected.

Oh no! Not science! ______ then added:

“If I listened totally to the scientists, we would right now have a country that would be in a massive depression.”

I guess millions and millions out of work doesn’t matter as long as the markets go up.

Cast a goddamned vote!!

More stupid? CNN analyst and New Yorker contributor Jeffrey Toobin was caught masturbating on a Zoom “election simulation” in front of prominent journalists and producers.

Seriously? A grown-ass man in the middle of a zoom call, takes a break and decides to whip out his dick for a few strokes, without turning off the camera?

The New Yorker has suspended Toobin, and he has taken a leave from CNN.

Moving on to The Liar File … a few weeks ago ______ said he would spend up to $100 million of his own money on his reelection bid. Cut to October and ______ has contributed about $8,000.

Maybe he doesn’t really want it this time … or he’s broke … so let’s give him his wish.

Cast a goddamned vote!

Last week SCOTUS declared that Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that are received up to three days after the election must be counted,  and this week a U.S. federal appeals court left in place North Carolina’s plan for counting absentee ballots that arrive after Election Day.

A smackdown for _____,  but a win for democracy and free and fair elections.

Despite a federal judge's order that the US reunite families separated at the border under _____’s "no tolerance" immigration policy, the parents of 545 children still can't be found.

Thanks America; you’re complicit in stealing children from their parents. How proud we must be.

This week Pope Francis called for the passage of civil union laws for same-sex couples.

Look at that! The Pope and, by extension, the Catholic Church, have finally arrived … in 2000. How long before they join the rest of us in 2020?

After all this rubbish, I need a beefy hunk to cleanse my palate … so here’s Tom Berklund, an out Broadway actor, singer, dancer, and, as you can see, a very hot man.


He sings, he dances, he poses in his underwear … 


Okay   

Monday, April 01, 2019

More Religious Hypocrisy From The Catholics

Lynn Starkey has been a guidance counselor at Roncalli High School, a Catholic high school in Indianapolis, with over 39 years of experience. But she’s out of a job because, you guess it, gay and in a civil union with a woman!

The school and the city’s Archdiocese will not be renewing her contract for the 2019-2020 school year because, they say, Starkey breached her employment agreement by falling in love with a woman and having a civil union ceremony … four years ago. In addition to her 39 years of service, Lynn Starkey was recognized as Teacher of the Year in 2009 while still a lesbian.

Lynn Starkey filed a discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in November 2018, claiming she was discriminated against based on her sexual orientation.

Huh.

In addition, another guidance counselor at Roncalli, Shelly Fitzgerald, who had worked at the school for fifteen years was placed on leave last month when it was learned that she, too, had married a woman.

Starkey’s attorney, Kathleen DeLaney:
“There are more than 60 schools in the Archdiocese of Indianapolis and thousands of employees. Shelly Fitzgerald and Lynn Starkey are the only ones we know of who have been asked, ‘Are you violating church teachings?’”
And if that’s true, if the Archdiocese hasn’t questioned every employee, then they have singled out both Lynn Starkey and Shelly Fitzgerald because they are gay, and doesn’t that sound like plain and simple discrimination?

But, again, it’s the Catholic Church which would rather remove a valued employee … two valuable employees … because of their sexual orientation, but also turn a blind eye to priests raping children.

Gay people, they fire; pedophiles, they protect.

How Christlike.

Friday, July 10, 2015

Today In Stoopid: Colorado Ballot Measure Wants To Make Same-Sex Marriages Into Civil Unions

Out in Colorado this week, in light of that Supreme Court ruling on marriage equality, a new ballot initiative has been proposed that would redefine same-sex marriages in the state as civil unions; in addition, a second initiative would allow wedding-related businesses to discriminate against same-sex couples.

Colorado wants to ignore the Supreme Court and redefine marriage, though they fought the efforts to redefine it for the past several years; but I guess if you redefine it to discriminate against The Gays then that’s okay?

Or not. But, keeping marriage equality out of the state might be difficult, at best.

Dave Montez, the executive director of One Colorado, an LGBT advocacy group:
"This initiative is an unnecessary attempt to radically redefine all marriages in Colorado in order to undermine the Supreme Court's recent decision. Even before last week's Supreme Court decision, the 37 states that already had marriage equality had proven that when loving, committed, gay couples share in the freedom to marry, families are helped and no one is hurt. The freedom to marry is a precious, fundamental right that belongs to all."
I’m’a make this queer for Colorado: you cannot change marriages to civil unions for The Gays just because your knickers are twisted. It won’t work, because you cannot retroactively change the marriages that have already occurred to a different status, and so then to deny marriage now — even under the guise of a new name — goes against the rules of Equal Protection that the Supremes used to make marriage equality the law of the land.

Seriously, Colorado. Build a bridge and get over it. Gay folks are getting married and no one is getting hurt by it.

Monday, October 13, 2014

Wedding Week Repost: Equal Rights Aren't Special Rights

This first appeared on ISBL back in December 2008, and it reinfoirced the belief I had then, and the belief I have now, especially given that I am getting married this week, that, while some folks were all gung ho for Civil Unions, they were "less than."


Equal Rights Aren't Special Rights


This is a good day for gay marriage. Another step in the right direction, toward equality. 

After allowing civil unions, the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission has come out with a report that says Civil Unions don't work, that the only fair, equitable solution, is for New Jersey to join Massachusetts and Connecticut, in allowing gay men and women the right to marry. 

Marry. Say it with me. Marry! 

Because, as they say, it is still 'separate but equal,' this civil union business. It creates problems for gay couples, and gay couples with children regarding medical care and so on. 

A few years back, when we were still living in Miami, Carlos had appendicitis, and we had to rush him to the Mount Sinai on Miami Beach for surgery. Of course, he's in absolute pain and we have to admit him and fill out paper work and all that rot, but I found something interesting. 

They were asking him who to notify, in case of emergency. He pointed to me; the nurse asked if I was his brother, or another family member. I thought I knew where this was going and I tried to jump in before Carlos answered, but I was too late. 

He's my significant other, Carlos said. 

The nurse gave us a look, stared at the computer screen for a moment, and then smiled. I get to use the new form, she said. We have a category now for same-sex couples, to put down the contact person as a significant other, or spouse or partner. She told us they hadn't been able to do so in years past and it created difficulty for gay couples. 

Now, I could make decisions for Carlos if necessary. I could stay in the room with Carlos while he was hospitalized. i was allowed to wait in the Family Waiting Room when he had surgery and the doctor came out after the procedure to tell me Carlos was fine. 

I would have hated to be at Mount Sinai in 'years past' and been denied visitation because I wasn't family, been denied information because I wasn't family, denied being treated equally because I wasn't family. 

Of course, now we're in South Carolina and I don't know if that same generosity of spirit, that understanding of what makes a family, what makes a couple, exists here. But New Jersey is showing us that it can, and it should. 

I don't want to be treated differently than anyone else, I want to be treated the same. 

Monday, April 15, 2013

If Roger Gorley Was Legally Married To Allen Mansell I Wouldn't Be Posting This

This is one of those he said/he said, she said/he said, he said/they said, they said/they said stories, so, well, now I’ll have my say. But, I’ll start at the beginning, with a little background, before the story actually gets started.


Allen Mansell suffers from severe depression and, twice monthly, undergoes electro-shock treatment [ECT] at Research Medical Center in Kansas City because his medications no longer allow him to function normally. His partner, Roger Gorley—the couple had a civil union ceremony five years ago and have given each other power of attorney, especially in medical instances—says Allen specifically excluded his biological family from having any say over his medical decisions because they have not been understanding of the impact of his depression, and are not supportive of his relationship with Roger.

One day last week, Roger’s daughter, Amanda Brown, was taking care of Allen while her father was at work. They had gone out to run some errands, and when they returned home they found Allen’s brother Lee and sister Pat were waiting at the door with paramedics and police.

Allen was said to have appeared sluggish, so police determined that he was a “danger to himself” and decided to take him to the hospital against his will. But they didn’t take him to St. Luke’s Hospital in Lee’s Summit, the local hospital where his regular doctors are, and instead took him to the Research Medical Center in Kansas City, which he only goes to for his ECT. 

Amanda tried explaining  Allen's medical needs and procedures, but no one was listening, so she she called her father, Roger, and urged him to get to St. Luke’s immediately, and when he arrived, Lee was also there. Lee stated that he would not allow Roger to make any medical decisions for Allen and that he would do so instead. Naturally this infuriated Roger, who reportedly shouted, “No you won’t! This is my husband.  I know what he wants and needs. You are never around.  You need to leave.”

A shouting match ensued between the two men in a case of what Carlos calls ¿Quién es más macho? A nurse entered the room and told Roger Gorley he would have to leave because of his agitated state, and when he explained that he would be staying with his husband, she reportedly replied, “I know who you two are. You need to leave.”

The nurse refused to acknowledge their legal relationship—and remember, this is the hospital where Roger takes Allen twice a month and they are very well known—she called the police to forcibly remove Roger Gorley from the room.

Allen Mansell, in and out of consciousness, reportedly objected to Gorley’s removal, saying, “I want him here.”

When officers from the Kansas City PD arrived on scene, they ordered Roger to leave, and when he did not comply, they considered this a refusal to cooperate and began to forcibly remove him. One officer began hitting him on his wrists when he wouldn't let go of the gurney. Roger Gorley was wrestled to the ground, his glasses knocked from his face, and his hearing aids out of his ears. One officer held a knee to his back and he was handcuffed.

This part, however gruesome and grotesque, is unsubstantiated, except by Amanda Brown: police assumed because Roger is gay that he must have HIV, and since the struggle had drawn blood, one officer was so disturbed that he insisted on using gloves to handle Roger and refused to even take back his handcuffs.

It took three hours to process Roger at the station and bail him out of jail. According to Amanda’s account, he was also issued a restraining order prohibiting him from stepping foot on the hospital grounds to see his husband.

Long after the scuffle with police, and Roger was taken away, the hospital finally asked Lee to leave as well, at Allen’s request.

Roger Gorley, for his part, says the dispute started after Allen's brother Lee called 911 without letting him know in the first place:
"Haul your husband into a hospital without even talking to me about it -- that's like overwriting us as a couple of who we. That would be like me going over to his house and taking his wife and hauling her off to the hospital without talking to him."—Roger Gorley
He also said the nurse refused to confirm that the couple shared power of attorney and made medical decision for each other. he said she wouldn't even take the time to look up the information.

Allen’s brother Lee, for his part, acknowledged that there was a two-sided, heated, exchange in the room that day, because a “nurse had come in the first time and said 'you two need to leave the room,' so we kind of quieted down for a minute. Roger wanted me to leave the room, and I told him 'well, no, you need to leave the room' and the nurses came in the second time and said 'you both need to leave the room.'"

And yet the nurse only called security to have Roger Gorley removed, and it was hospital security who called Kansas City police officers.  It appears that Amanda brown was confused, and that it was hospital security that wrestled her father to the ground because Cpt. Steve Young, a spokesperson for the Kansas City PD, said when officers on the scene Roger was already in handcuffs and bleeding.

Now, we have a family dispute, we have hospital staff involved and the security team on-site as well as local police. Seems like the perfect time for the feds to get involved; and for good reason.

Since 2010, President Barack Obama has ordered hospitals that receive Medicare or Medicaid funding to allow visitation rights for gay and lesbian partners, so after Gorley's removal and arrest, federal officials "are working to gather the facts and determine what steps to take in a speedy manner."

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS], which enforces federal regulations, is looking into the matter. CMS spokesman Brian Cook said, "CMS is aware of this specific issue and we are working to gather the facts and determine what steps to take in a speedy manner …. All Americans are guaranteed the right to receive hospital visitors that they designate, and there are specific protections in our rules for same-sex couples across the country. We take alleged violations of federal rules around hospital visitation very seriously."

Those protections for same-sex couples are really quite simple; CMS regulations say:
"When a patient who is not incapacitated, has designated, either orally to hospital staff or in writing, another individual to be his/her representative, the hospital must involve the designated representative in the development and implementation of the patient's plan of care."
And yet the hospital threw that person out of the room against the wishes of the patient. And some, most notably Amanda Brown, are saying it's because Roger and Allen are a gay couple.But the hospital, Research Medical Center, is insisting that it does not discriminate based on sexual orientation and released this statement:
“We believe involving the family is an important part of the patient care process. And, the patient`s needs are always our first priority. When anyone becomes disruptive to providing the necessary patient care, we involve our security team to help calm the situation and to protect our patients and staff. If the situation continues to escalate, we have no choice but to request police assistance.”
When the story went viral last Thursday, Research Medical Center’s Denise Charpentier, VP of Marketing and Public Relations said:
“Research Medical Center was one of the first hospitals in Kansas City to offer domestic partner benefits, which have been in place since 2005, and we have had a policy specifically acknowledging domestic partners’ visitation rights in place for years …. This was an issue of disruptive and belligerent behavior by the visitor that affected patient care.  The hospital’s response followed the same policies that would apply to any individual engaged in this behavior in a patient care setting and was not in any way related to the patient’s or the visitor’s sexual orientation or marital status. This visitor created a barrier for us to care for the patient. Attempts were made to deescalate the situation. Unfortunately, we had no choice but to involve security and the Kansas City MO Police Department.”
This still doesn’t explain why Roger Gorley, and Allen’s brother, Lee, weren’t both removed from the room, if they were both being disruptive. In fact, Rob Dyer of HCA seems to suggest Roger was specifically targeted:
“When the nurse went in to ask them to please quiet down and please stop this and they continued, and every time they stepped out it would get escalated, so she stepped back in and asked them to remove themselves for the sake of the patient at the moment …. He [Gorley] and the patient’s brother were fighting in the patient’s room very loudly, very crassly, inappropriate language.”
Dyer contends that the accusations made by both roger Gorley and his daughter Amanda, that the hospital treated Gorley differently because he is gay are particularly upsetting given the hospital’s record: “We were one of the first to have same sex benefits in the market. We were one of the first to acknowledge same sex partnerships.”

That’s all well and good, and I commend them on that particular action, but that policy does not make it impossible for a nurse, or a hospital security person, to treat Roger Gorley the way they did, simply because of his sexual orientation.

And then, because the story won't die, the hospital released yet another statement which seems to contradict their first account. Rob Dyer claims Gorley was asked to leave because he wouldn’t quiet down, and yet they also claim he was asked to leave because he was asked to show his medical power of attorney for Allen and couldn’t provide it.

So, which is it? Was Roger Gorley being disruptive and belligerent, but Lee wasn’t? Or, was Roger Gorley not carrying, on his person, the proper legal documents he needs to be in the room with his partner since the United States treats same-sex couples as less than?

But, and here’s the rub, Roger didn’t need to provide any proof of his medical power of attorney, or anything else for that matter, if, as his daughter claims, Allen Mansell said, during the altercation, “I want him here.”

Under federal regulations, that's all that's needed, and the argument ends; Roger stays. But, if Amanda is wrong and Allen never said ‘I want him here’ then what happens? Well, federal regulations also states that the partner, Roger, in this case, can simply say “I’m in charge,” and that’s enough unless  someone else asserts that they too are in charge of the patient.

Now, maybe that’s what happened, and maybe Lee tried to assert that he was in charge, but then the hospital throws yet another version of events out there. According to the police report, the hospital told police officers the reason they ejected Roger was because the hospital “did not want to have any visitors to Allen’s room.” There was no mention at all of disruptions or fighting or anything. They simply didn’t want Allen to have visitors.

And yet that completely contradicts Dyer’s claim that Roger was ejected, not because they wanted no visitors, but rather because of the fight.  And, if they didn’t want anyone in the room, then it wouldn’t have mattered if Roger had had a medical power of attorney, so why did they ask for it?  And if they wanted no visitors in the room, then why does daughter Amanda say that they were all permitted to stay in the room—even Lee—after the police took Roger away? 

Here's what i do know: Roger Gorley and Allen Mansell are a couple united under a civil union. They have both filed the necessary paperwork to be granted power of attorney over one another, and the power to make medical decisions for one another. Maybe Roger did get mad that Lee called 911, but he had that right. And maybe he got mad that Lee wanted him out of the room, and he had that right.

But what I find tragic about this whole story--and there are so many sides we may never know what actually happened--is that this whole situation could have been avoided with just two words:

"I do."


Thursday, April 11, 2013

Random Musings

It's keeping on ... four more democrats have come out for equality!

#51: Bill Nelson, Democratic Senator from Florida:
"If we are endowed by our Creator with rights, then why shouldn't those be attainable by Gays and Lesbians? Simply put, if The Lord made homosexuals as well as heterosexuals, why should I discriminate against their civil marriage? I shouldn't, and I won't."
#52: Heidi Heitkamp, Democratic Senator from North Dakota:
"I have concluded the federal government should no longer discriminate against people who want to make lifelong, loving commitments to each other or interfere in personal, private, and intimate relationships. I view the ability of anyone to marry as a logical extension of this belief. The makeup of families is changing, but the importance of family is enduring."
#53: Joe Donnelly, Democratic Senator from Indiana:
"I oppose amending either Indiana’s or our nation’s constitution to enshrine in those documents an ‘us’ and a ‘them,’ instead of a ‘we.’ With the recent Supreme Court arguments and accompanying public discussion of same-sex marriage, I have been thinking about my past positions and votes. In doing so, I have concluded that the right thing to do is to support marriage equality for all."
#54: Tim Johnson, Democratic Senator from South Dakota:
"After lengthy consideration, my views have evolved sufficiently to support marriage equality legislation. This position doesn't require any religious denomination to alter any of its tenets; it simply forbids government from discrimination regarding who can marry whom."
That leaves Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana as the only Democrats not endorsing marriage equality. Manchin reaffirmed his opposition last week and Landrieu says she supports same-sex marriage but won’t endorse it because her constituents do not.
Around here folks don't call it Walmart, they call it The Walmart. However, I call it The Place To Avoid At All Costs Because They Treat Their Employees Like Crap And Everything They Sell Is Made In China. It's long-winded, yes, but you get the idea. 

But that picture is a funny reason I don't shop at that place. Someone bought loads of those shirts to sell and not one person in the corporation thought it might be slightly off? Proves that no gays work at The Walmart.


h/t to BosGuy for the photo.
Look! Here's a Democrat whose against marriage equality; what a rare and stupid breed.
Arkansas Senator Mark Pryor:
“I am opposed to gay marriage ... I also discussed whether gay couples should receive benefits if they work for the federal government. On the benefits issue, I said to ‘put me down in the undecided category.’  By that I meant that, depending on what the U.S. Supreme Court decides, I will evaluate whether federal benefits should be available to gay couples. Of course, I will consider the impact any extension of benefits would have on the federal budget.”
Ass.Hat.
Then we have Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, who thinks Civil Unions are the answer:
"I’ll say this, I do believe this could be solved greatly by a civil-union law that would give gay people the same rights as married people. I think we can solve this problem without undermining the very basis of marital law in our country."
But then you have a very clear case of Separate But Equal; all the same rights, but let’s call it something different. No.
After tiny Bisbee City in Arizona approved Civil unions for same-sex couples, it looks like a larger Arizona city might follow suit.

The Tempe City Council will be getting legal advice on civil unions. Councilman Kolby Granville requested the executive-session discussion and plans to ask for council action on civil unions in coming weeks. Granville says it’s an issue of civil rights and that civil unions would be the next best thing to same-sex marriage. Well, it's the less than next best thing.

In the case of Bisbee City, though, Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne will be taking the case to court to block Bisbee’s new ordinance because he said the town council acted outside its legal authority because state laws control things such as community property.
The Oklahoma House approved, by a vote of 84-0, a resolution reaffirming marriage as between one man and one woman, and also reaffirming Oklahoma’s support of DOMA, which prohibits recognition of same-sex marriages.

Not such big news considering that it’s Oklahoma, but what was surprising was that all 29 House Democrats, including House Democratic Leader Scott Inman and openly gay Congressman Kay Floyd, walked out of the chamber in protest instead of voting.

The resolution doesn't carry the weight of law, and is just intended as a message to the Supreme Court, which recently heard arguments in cases concerning same-sex marriage. It now heads to the state Senate.

Here’s a message from me Oklahoma Republicans: Bugger off.
So, Margaret Thatcher died this week and there was praise for her, and there was also rejoicing in her passing; Thatcher was nothing, if not divisive. But, on a funny note, when the story broke of her death on Twitter folks began Tweeting and Hash-tagging about it like this:
#nowthatchersdead
I see it. But, without the use of spacing--which cannot be used in a proper hashtag, y'all--and without the use of any capital letters, many people read the hashtag like this:
#now that chers dead
And Twitter went cray-cray.
Silly Tweeters, if Cher had actually did, and you know she never will, Twitter would have literally exploded.
On the marriage front: interior designer Nate Berkus and former Rachel Zoe assistant Jeremiah Brent are engaged. They have been dating about 9 months and Berkus proposed atop Machu Picchu in Peru.

Also getting married are musician, songwriter and record producer Linda Perry and actress and The Talk host, Sara Gilbert, who told of the engagement on TV this week:
"We go to a park, we have food and we're eating it, it's really sweet and there's this guy sitting playing guitar, like a street musician ... He starts playing this song that we love. I'm like, 'Oh, that's so weird, this is so magical and amazing.' ... Suddenly the people picnicking next to us pull out string instruments from under the blanket and walk over and they start playing 'Love Song'."
Perry then popped the question, spelled out on five different t-shirts, before pulling out an engagement ring.

Congratulations to both couples, and let’s hope this starts a trend of congratulating same-sex couples all across the country.
I recently found out that, when commenting on other blogs that have the captcha, that I don’t need to put in the numbers—which are sometimes impossible to read—but I can get by with just typing the letters. Am I the first to find this out, or the last?
This just in: Uruguay gave final approval to marriage equality when its House voted 71-21 to pass the bill. President José Mujica says he intends to sign it.

Uruguay now joins The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland, Argentina, and Denmark as the 12th nation to offer its citizens nationwide marriage equality.

Brazil, Mexico, and the U.S. offer it in parts of the country. Funny, how all these other countries can so easily adopt and adapt to marriage equality across their entire land, yet here in the ‘progressive’ US we stutter and stammer along.
Ah, the GOP, in the weeks and months after losing the White House again began spewing nonsense about rebranding the party, becoming more inclusive.

Yeah, not so much. See, this weekend the Republican National Committee will be meeting to discuss their goals and aspirations for the future, and one of those discussions is to vote that marriage always and ever be a One Man and One Woman deal.

Rebranding themselves as the same old losers. Not so smart.
When Turtle, er, Mitch McConnell learned that actress Ashley Judd might run against him for his seat in Congress, he got his big boy pants all in a twist and vowed to spend every dime he had to defeat her. But, since he is Turtle, er, Mitchy, he decided to play as unfair as possible.

Some secret recordings of meetings between McConnell and his strategists reveal that they had planned—and I say planned because Ashley Judd recently announced that she would not run for office—to destroy Ashley Judd by playing her up as mentally ill.

Nice. Don’t run on the issues, Mitchy, run on rumor. But, now that the tapes have been released and people are all up in arms about McConnell’s underhanded ways, is he trying to back-pedal and apologize?

Of course not, Mitchy is complaining that he’s the victim because he was recorded being a dick and no one told him.

That’s because Ya ‘are a dick, Mitch. Ya ’are a dick.
The Montana House is moving forward with a measure to repeal an obsolete state law that criminalizes gay sex, despite a committee's decision to table it.

Openly gay Congressman Bryce Bennett [that's him up there] made the motion to take Senate Bill 107 out of the House Judiciary Committee and place it on the agenda for a House vote. Bennett says the law emphasizes inequality and pointed to the 1997 Montana Supreme Court case that ruled the language criminalizing gay sex was unconstitutional.

"Under this law, I am considered a felon," Bennett said. "I am not your equal."

Yeah, in Montana being gay and having consensual sex makes you a criminal. And, in the eyes of the Fear-Baiting GOP, legalizing gay sex would lead to societal degradation and gay sex being taught in schools' sex education classes; like this: Insert Tab A into Slot B. Or something. Grow up.


UPDATE: the vote is in, and gay sex is no longer a crime in Montana! The vote was 64-36, with 25 Republicans crossing the aisle to vote with all 39 Democrats!
UPDATE: Ben Carson is out. No, not the closet, silly, though that wouldn’t be a surprise given how virulently homophobic he is. No, Dr. Ben has stepped down as this year's Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine commencement speaker because he didn’t want to “distract from the celebratory nature of the day."

Funny how he voluntarily withdraws and makes it look like his decision when many at the school students and staff, wanted him uninvited long ago.

Take a seat Dr. Ben you’re no longer needed.
I am loving Nashville because I loves me some Connie Britton and I loves me some hot men singing to me. Chris Carmack--wearing a lot of tight t-shirts--and hot Latino Jay Hernandez just joined the show, and look good with Sam Palladio and Charles Esten.
TWEET OF THE WEEK: