Showing posts with label Big Business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Business. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Big Pro-LGBT Business
Out there in Washington, where marriage equality inches closer to reality, a letter, signed by Microsoft, Vulcan, NIKE, RealNetworks, Group Health Cooperative, and Concur was sent to legislative leaders stating their support for marriage equality.
Now, they have:
You can't.
Thanks for the support, Microsoft, Vulcan, NIKE, RealNetworks, Group Health Cooperative, and Concur.
source
"We write you today to show the support of our respective companies for SB 6239 and HB 2516 recognizing marriage equality for same-sex couples."It was back in 2005 that Microsoft started a bit of a kerfuffle in Washington when the company stated that it was "neutral" on LGBT-rights legislation. After much criticism, though, Microsoft changed its position and endorsed LGBT-rights bills, including domestic partnerships for same-sex couples. But it was only a week or so ago that Microsoft said it was reviewing the marriage equality bill and had not yet decided to take a position.
Now, they have:
"Microsoft is joining other Northwest employers Concur, Group Health Cooperative, Nike, RealNetworks and Vulcan Inc. in support of Washington State legislation recognizing marriage equality for same-sex couples. This position builds on our history of supporting corporate and public policies that promote inclusion and equality.Microsoft's greatest asset is a talented workforce as diverse as our customers. As other states recognize marriage equality, Washington's employers are at a disadvantage if we cannot offer a similar, equitable and inclusive environment to our talented employees, our top recruits and their families. This legislation would put Washington employers on equal footing with employers in the six other states that already recognize the committed relationships of same-sex couples. Passing the bill would be good for our business and for the state's economy."How can you, as a business, expect o move ahead, expect to be able to hire the best employees, expect to at the forefront of business, when you denigrate one group by, either denying them rights, or staying neutral?
You can't.
Thanks for the support, Microsoft, Vulcan, NIKE, RealNetworks, Group Health Cooperative, and Concur.
source
Thursday, December 01, 2011
Hey Chick-fil-A? Eat This!
Bo Muller-Moore runs a business out of his home, built around the words "eat more kale", which he calls an expression of the benefits of local agriculture. He even silkscreens his slogan on T-shirts and sweatshirts.
Eat more kale.
Nothing wrong there, right?
Not so, says Chick-fil-A, which holds the trademark to the phrase "eat mor chikin." And, in a letter sent to Muller-Moore, a lawyer for Chick-fil-A said his use of the words 'eat more kale' "is likely to cause confusion of the public and dilutes the distinctiveness of Chick-fil-A's intellectual property and diminishes its value."
Dilute the distinctiveness of a multi-million dollar, rabidly homophobic, by the way, company?
Chick-fil-A has a long history of guarding--or being total bitches--its trademark, and the letter listed 30 examples of attempts by others to co-opt the use of the "eat more" phrase that were withdrawn after Chick-fil-A protested. The letter ordered Muller-Moore to stop using the phrase and turn over his website, eatmorekale.com, to Chick-fil-A.
WTF!
Bo Muller-Moore isn't playing: "Our plan is to not back down. This feels like David versus Goliath. I know what it's like to protect what's yours in business." Muller-Moore has enlisted the help of Montpelier lawyer Daniel Richardson and the intellectual property clinic at the University of New Hampshire School of Law's Intellectual Property and Transaction Clinic to fight the Big Chicken.
Daniel Richardson says: "Bo's is a very different statement. It's more of a philosophical statement about local agriculture and community-supported farmers markets. At the end of the day, I don't think anyone will step forward and say they bought an 'eat more kale' shirt thinking it was a Chick-fil-A product."
Chick-fil-A spokesman Don Perry said the company does not comment on pending legal matters.
Foot stomp, neck-snap.
Vermont Law School professor Oliver Goodenough, who specializes in intellectual and property law, said the kale versus "chikin" fight reminded him of a case two years ago, when a Morrisville microbrewer that makes a beer called "Vermonster" ran afoul of the Monster energy drink company. That case was settled when the makers of Vermonster agreed never to go into the energy drink business. He added that there was little likelihood consumers would confuse kale with chicken.
Ya think.
This is just a case of the 1%--and a rabidly homophobic 1%--stepping on the 99% and I, for one, will EAT MORE KALE. And i'll stop in at eatmorekale.com to buy a shirt, sign his petition fighting the Big Chicken, and say Hi to Bo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)