Showing posts with label Gabrielle Giffords. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gabrielle Giffords. Show all posts
Friday, August 21, 2020
Tuesday, January 10, 2017
On This Date In ISBL History: Stop. Just Stop.
Friday, February 08, 2013
I Didn't Say It ....
David Lammy, UK Labour MP, speaking before the House of Commons debate before they voted to approve marriage equality:
"Let me speak frankly.
Separate but equal” is a fraud. Separate but equal” is the language that tried to push Rosa Parks to the back of the bus. Separate but equal” is the motif that determined that black and white could not possibly drink from the same water fountain, eat at the same table or use the same toilets. “Separate but equal” are the words that justified sending black children to different schools from their white peers – schools that would fail them and condemn them to a life of poverty.
It is an excerpt from the phrasebook of the segregationists and the racists. It is the same statement, the same ideas and the same delusion that we borrowed in this country to say that women could vote – but not until they were 30. It is the same naivety that gave made my dad a citizen in 1956 but refused to condemn the landlords that proclaimed “no blacks, no Irish, no dogs”. It entrenched who we were, who our friends could be and what our lives could become.
This was not “Separate but equal” but “Separate AND discriminated”,
“Separate AND oppressed”.
“Separate AND browbeaten”.
“Separate AND subjugated”.
Separate is NOT equal, so let us be rid of it.
Because as long as there is one rule for us and another for them, we allow the barriers to acceptance to stand unchallenged. As long as our statute books suggest that the love between two men or two women is unworthy of being recognised through marriage, we allow the rot of homophobia to fester."
Not much else to say when someone puts it so succinctly, concisely, and eloquently.
"Yes. My attitude is that
gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everybody
else does, in every institution and walk of life. The Scouts are a great
institution that are promoting young people and exposing them to opportunities
and leadership that will serve people for the rest of their lives. And I think
nobody should be barred from that."
Plain and simple: Yes.
Michael Musto, on former NYC mayor Ed Koch, who died last
week:
"It's a shame the ex-NYC mayor never came out. It's tragic
that he hid behind excuses like the fact that he was old and wasn't sexual at
all anymore. Old people are still sexual--and if you're gay, you're still
gay--and besides, he could have commented on his past. But Ed was so paranoid
on the subject that when I interviewed him in the '90s, he propped up a tape
recorder to tape me as I recorded him. It was a creepy double game
of 'gotcha!' that led nowhere (though he was otherwise gruffly charming) ....
The world is now an emptier place, but so is the celebrity closet."
Just another example of the closeted life some folks lead,
and how, no matter how successful, how important, they still carry a sense of
shame about being gay.
Gabby Giffords, at the Senate
Judiciary Committee's hearing on gun violence:
"Thank you for inviting me here today. This is an important conversation for our children, for our communities, for Democrats and Republicans. Speaking is difficult, but I need to say something important. Violence is a big problem. Too many children are dying. Too many children. We must do something. It will be hard, but the time is now. You must act. Be bold, be courageous. Americans are counting on you. Thank you."
"Thank you for inviting me here today. This is an important conversation for our children, for our communities, for Democrats and Republicans. Speaking is difficult, but I need to say something important. Violence is a big problem. Too many children are dying. Too many children. We must do something. It will be hard, but the time is now. You must act. Be bold, be courageous. Americans are counting on you. Thank you."
Out of the mouths of victims
of gun violence ....
Hopefully we can fix this
thing.
Chris Culliver, San Francisco
49er cornerback, on having gay players in the NFL:
"I don't do the gay guys man. I don't do that. No, we don't got no gay people on the team, they gotta get up out of here if they do....Can't be with that sweet stuff. Nah…can't be…in the locker room man. Nah."
"I don't do the gay guys man. I don't do that. No, we don't got no gay people on the team, they gotta get up out of here if they do....Can't be with that sweet stuff. Nah…can't be…in the locker room man. Nah."
Sounds to me like he obsesses
a little too much about gay guys in the locker-room, but let me break it down
for him like this:
He seems to think that a
young gay kid will learn to play football, and become so good at it that he
gets chosen to play for a good college. And then, at that college, where he
excels in football, he is seen by NFL scouts and then picked to be part of a professional
football team. And gay guys go through all of that so they can be in the locker-room
with naked athletes?
Howsabout just joining a gym?
Seems simpler.
Chris Culliver, apologizing, sort of:
"The derogatory comments I made yesterday were a
reflection of thoughts in my head, but they are not how I feel. It has taken me
seeing them in print to realize that they are hurtful and ugly. Those
discriminating feelings are truly not in my heart. Further, I apologize to
those who I have hurt and offended, and I pledge to learn and grow from this
experience."
Um, the thoughts in your head? They aren't how you feel?
So, it was a voice in your head that made you stupid?
Hopefully, one day, you'll be able to separate the intelligent thoughts in your
head from the asinine thoughts in your head.
Brendon Ayanbadejo, Baltimore
Raven, on Culliver's anti-gay remarks:
"You know, I think that in San Francisco, and being from the Bay Area myself, that's something that we really try to preach--love and acceptance of everybody. And so I couldn't really even say anything negative to the young man. It's just one of those things where you have to live and you have to learn. And I said earlier on--in the words of Martin Luther King, you can't fight hate with hate. You have to fight hate with love. We've all made our mistakes, we've all been there and done certain things, and we've hurt people regardless if we meant to do it or not. But more than anything it's an opportunity to have a learning experience….I've preached since day one to my teammates that there's certain words you can't say. And when they're around me they know -- if B.A.'s around, you can't say 'gay' in a derogatory manner, you can't say the three-letter 'f' word. And I tell them, I go, you can't say those things. And if people hear you say those things, regardless if you mean them or not, they're going to fry you. And if it's in a public arena your whole reputation's going to be roasted for it. So we've kind of seen it happen this time. So we just have to all learn from what happened, from this mistake. He apologized and hopefully he'll learn. And he's in the Bay Area, and it's really important there, it's pertinent there. So I think he's going to learn and he's going to grow to be a better person for it."
"You know, I think that in San Francisco, and being from the Bay Area myself, that's something that we really try to preach--love and acceptance of everybody. And so I couldn't really even say anything negative to the young man. It's just one of those things where you have to live and you have to learn. And I said earlier on--in the words of Martin Luther King, you can't fight hate with hate. You have to fight hate with love. We've all made our mistakes, we've all been there and done certain things, and we've hurt people regardless if we meant to do it or not. But more than anything it's an opportunity to have a learning experience….I've preached since day one to my teammates that there's certain words you can't say. And when they're around me they know -- if B.A.'s around, you can't say 'gay' in a derogatory manner, you can't say the three-letter 'f' word. And I tell them, I go, you can't say those things. And if people hear you say those things, regardless if you mean them or not, they're going to fry you. And if it's in a public arena your whole reputation's going to be roasted for it. So we've kind of seen it happen this time. So we just have to all learn from what happened, from this mistake. He apologized and hopefully he'll learn. And he's in the Bay Area, and it's really important there, it's pertinent there. So I think he's going to learn and he's going to grow to be a better person for it."
Maybe he needs a good long
sit down with Brendon.
Couldn't hurt.
Terrell Suggs, Baltimore
Ravens outside linebacker, on the idea of a gay teammate:
“On this team, with so many different personalities, we just accept people for who they are and we don’t really care too much about a player’s sexuality. To each their own. You know who you are, and we accept you for it.”
“On this team, with so many different personalities, we just accept people for who they are and we don’t really care too much about a player’s sexuality. To each their own. You know who you are, and we accept you for it.”
As it should be.
Beyoncé, on LipsyncGate:
"I am a perfectionist. I did not have time to rehearse with the orchestra for a live television show and a very very important emotional show for me one of my proudest moments. I did not feel comfortable taking a risk. It was about the president and the inauguration and I wanted to make him and our country proud so I decided to sing along with my prerecorded track. I'm very proud of my performance."
"I am a perfectionist. I did not have time to rehearse with the orchestra for a live television show and a very very important emotional show for me one of my proudest moments. I did not feel comfortable taking a risk. It was about the president and the inauguration and I wanted to make him and our country proud so I decided to sing along with my prerecorded track. I'm very proud of my performance."
She's a perfectionist who doesn't have time to rehearse? It
was a very important and emotional performance but she didn’t have time to
rehearse?
It was about the president but all she talks about is what
the moment meant to her.
Be proud, Beyoncé. Kelly's proud, too, and she sang
live.
Bill Donohoe, Catholic wingnut, on the story of the ‘gay’
dog in Tennessee:
"This week in Tennessee a dog was rescued from being
euthanized (one news outlet said he was being spared 'the Gas Chamber') because
the condition driving the dog’s death was his alleged homosexuality (the owner
was ticked when he saw his Fido hunch another male dog). For reasons that
appear entirely reasonable, the gal who rescued the dog named him Elton. The
place where Elton was dropped encourages dog adoption, but it also promotes dog
euthanasia. Not, however, in Elton’s case: the shelter has no stomach for
putting dogs down on the basis of sexual orientation. It must be said, though,
that the shelter is not exactly inclusive in its policies. To wit: Had poor
Elton not been identified as a homosexual, his heterosexuality would not have
been enough to save his hide. The moral of the story is: Being gay is not only
a bonus for humans these days, it is a definite plus for dogs as well. As for
straights, the lonely and the disabled, that’s another story altogether."
Someone needs a nap if he thinks the dog was saved because
he was gay.
The dog was saved because there was no legitimate reason to
put him down.
Iain Dale, British columnist,
on the marriage equality battle, and hypocrisy of the naysayers, in Great Britain:
"I’ve
been looking at the Coalition for Equal Marriage’s website, and their list of
MPs who intend to vote against allowing gay people to marry on Tuesday. I note
with interest the names of several MPs who most people in the Westminster
Village know to be closet case gays. And I note also the names of two
supposedly straight MPs who I know to be conducting gay affairs at the moment.
I don’t believe in ‘outing’ anyone, but because of the rank hypocrisy there
will be others who will take a different view. How is it possible to be married
yourself, and yet at the same time vote to deny that privilege to someone whose
pants you have just pulled down?"
Ouch.
If
I were one of those closeted MPs, I might watch my step in the next few weeks
or I might find myself on the front page of a London tabloid with my hand in
some cookie's jar.
Rick Santorum, on plans this
week by the Boy Scouts to drop its ban on The Gays:
"Scouting prepares boys
and teenagers to be virtuous men in a world that desperately needs men who are
brave enough to stand up for those principles, to live by the moral code of the
Scout Oath and Law and hold themselves to that standard – whether at the
schoolyard or in the boardroom. Scouting may not survive this transformation of
American society, but for the sake of the average boy in America, I hope the
board of the Scouts doesn’t have its fingerprints on the murder weapon."
Virtuous men cannot be gay, I
guess, in Frothy's world.
Good thing even his own party
finds him unworthy of recognition so he resorts to conservative blogs to Froth
up his bigotry.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Random Musings
So, there was this man who called 911 to say that he was
stuck in a pair of handcuffs and needed help before it, um, became a ‘medical
emergency.’
If I had a nickel for every time I …. But I digress.
It turns out, however that the man was Father Tom Donovan, the pastor of St. Aloysius church in
Springfield, Illinois.
“I’m going to need help
getting out before this becomes a medical emergency,” Father Donovan told a
dispatcher who asked, “You’re stuck in a pair of handcuffs?”
“(I was) playing with them
and I need help getting out.”
It’s not clear exactly how he ended up in
handcuffs or why he feared a medical emergency but his voice appeared muffled
on the recording and sources say when police arrived to remove the cuffs, they
found the good Father with some sort of gag in his mouth.
Now, I thought that may have
been gossip Overkill until I listened to the recording.
You be the judge. [Sidenote: Bishop
Thomas Paprocki granted Father Donovan’s request after his 911 escapade.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
It Shouldn't Matter, But It Does
Okay, this is hard for me, because i so seldom do it. But, yeah, here goes.
I was wr.....
I was wro.....
I was wron......
I.Was.Wrong.
Whoosh. That was hard. But, as usual, there's more. See, I was annoyed by some of the blogs in the 'hood that were complaining about the fact that news organizations weren't mentioning that Daniel Hernandez is gay.
Who, you say, if you've been living under a rock?
Hernandez is Gabrielle Giffords's assistant. He's the one who went to her side, applied pressure to her wound, and kept her calm amidst all that madness. Daniel Hernandez very well may have saved her life. And he's gay.
And some bloggers were pissed that his orientation wasn't being mentioned as though it played some role in what he did. And I was pissed because his orientation shouldn't matter. He saved her life because he's a compassionate human being; he aided her because he was trained as a Certified Nurse's Assistant, and knew what to do. He didn't step up because he was gay, but because he was human, and that's how we all should act, gay or straight.
But, and here's where I was wr.....not right.
Mary Elizabeth Williams, writing on Salon.com., "[Reporting that Hernandez is gay and Latino] matters because guys like Arizona Sen. John McCain, who described the repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell' as 'a very sad day,' still think that orientation has an effect on whether or not a person can ably serve in the military. It matters because the notion that two people of the same-sex can love each other and build a life together is still considered in many parts of the country, including Arizona, a threat to what is laughably referred to a "traditional marriage" — as if heterosexuals have really mopped up the floor with this whole commitment thing."
See, I didn't look at it that way because sometimes I want to look at the world through my fabulous rose colored glasses where sexual orientation doesn't matter. it doesn't make you better or worse than anyone else, it just makes you more like everyone else.
And we should all, gay and straight, strive to be more like Daniel Hernandez.
Read Mary William's article HERE.
I was wr.....
I was wro.....
I was wron......
I.Was.Wrong.
Whoosh. That was hard. But, as usual, there's more. See, I was annoyed by some of the blogs in the 'hood that were complaining about the fact that news organizations weren't mentioning that Daniel Hernandez is gay.
Who, you say, if you've been living under a rock?
Hernandez is Gabrielle Giffords's assistant. He's the one who went to her side, applied pressure to her wound, and kept her calm amidst all that madness. Daniel Hernandez very well may have saved her life. And he's gay.
And some bloggers were pissed that his orientation wasn't being mentioned as though it played some role in what he did. And I was pissed because his orientation shouldn't matter. He saved her life because he's a compassionate human being; he aided her because he was trained as a Certified Nurse's Assistant, and knew what to do. He didn't step up because he was gay, but because he was human, and that's how we all should act, gay or straight.
But, and here's where I was wr.....not right.
Mary Elizabeth Williams, writing on Salon.com., "[Reporting that Hernandez is gay and Latino] matters because guys like Arizona Sen. John McCain, who described the repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell' as 'a very sad day,' still think that orientation has an effect on whether or not a person can ably serve in the military. It matters because the notion that two people of the same-sex can love each other and build a life together is still considered in many parts of the country, including Arizona, a threat to what is laughably referred to a "traditional marriage" — as if heterosexuals have really mopped up the floor with this whole commitment thing."
See, I didn't look at it that way because sometimes I want to look at the world through my fabulous rose colored glasses where sexual orientation doesn't matter. it doesn't make you better or worse than anyone else, it just makes you more like everyone else.
And we should all, gay and straight, strive to be more like Daniel Hernandez.
Read Mary William's article HERE.
Labels:
Arizona,
Daniel Hernandez,
Democrat,
Gabrielle Giffords,
Gay,
Hero,
LGBTQ+
Monday, January 10, 2011
Stop. Just Stop.
The shooting has been everywhere; it's all over my TV, all over the web, on every front page and everybody's mind. I try to wrap my head around the idea that someone can shoot someone in the head at point blank range, for any reason, least of all different political views, or simple dislike. I try to wrap my mind around the thought that someone can simply open fire and shoot at anyone and everyone in sight.
And I wonder, how many fingers pulled that trigger that sent a bullet through Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ head, that discharged bullets that killed US District Judge John Roll, Gabe Zimmerman, Gifford’s director of community outreach; Dorwin Stoddard, a pastor at Mountain Ave. Church of Christ; Christina Greene, a student at Mesa Verde Elementary; Dorthy Murray and Phyllis Scheck.
I know there was one gunman, and maybe an accomplice, who will achieve no sense of notoriety by having their names or photographs mentions or shown in this space, ever, but there are more to blame. More people around this country who have been spouting hate, and promoting violence as a means to get their viewpoint heard.
Teabaggers who've said that any means necessary should be used to take back the country. Take it back from whom? People with a different idea? Why is there this need for using such hate-speech against a rival political group? Why is violence the answer they seem to promote so often? I am not a fan of Teabaggers, or of most Republicans or most conservatives, or most religious wingnuts, but I would never suggest violence, never suggest death be the answer to my problem with other people.
And, while we hold the Tea Party even partially responsible, let's also lay some blame squarely at the feet of Sarah Palin. I don't use her name here often, as I refer to call her the Mama Grizzly Bore, but today, her name must be used, because she has blood on her hands.
When you use words and phrases like putting someone in your 'crosshairs' exactly what do you think that means? Crosshairs. Guns. Violence. When you ask that your followers reload, instead of retreat, what are you telling them? Take up arms. Shoot. Take up arms, and take the lives of people with whom you disagree, even if one of them is a nine-year-old girl, and others are grandmothers.
This has to stop. We cannot become a nation where violence is the means to sway the vote, and gain momentum for our cause. This has to stop. It's time for people like the Tea Party, and their minions, and Sarah Palin, and her minions, to accept responsibility for their words.
Words have power; words create violence; words incite. Whether the words are aimed at the LGBT community, or a Muslim community center, a liberal, or a conservative, the words must stop inciting violence.
Different is good. Differing opinions are good because they create dialogue. But putting someone in your crosshairs, and threatening to reload, sends the message that violence is the answer.
It isn't. And it's up to us, all of us, liberal and conservative, Democrat, Republican, Independent, whatever political affiliation, religious affiliation, non-religious affiliation, gender, ethnicity, orientation, color, age, education, socio-economic standing, to stop this speech.
Stop it.
Or start getting more body bags.
And I wonder, how many fingers pulled that trigger that sent a bullet through Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ head, that discharged bullets that killed US District Judge John Roll, Gabe Zimmerman, Gifford’s director of community outreach; Dorwin Stoddard, a pastor at Mountain Ave. Church of Christ; Christina Greene, a student at Mesa Verde Elementary; Dorthy Murray and Phyllis Scheck.
I know there was one gunman, and maybe an accomplice, who will achieve no sense of notoriety by having their names or photographs mentions or shown in this space, ever, but there are more to blame. More people around this country who have been spouting hate, and promoting violence as a means to get their viewpoint heard.
Teabaggers who've said that any means necessary should be used to take back the country. Take it back from whom? People with a different idea? Why is there this need for using such hate-speech against a rival political group? Why is violence the answer they seem to promote so often? I am not a fan of Teabaggers, or of most Republicans or most conservatives, or most religious wingnuts, but I would never suggest violence, never suggest death be the answer to my problem with other people.
And, while we hold the Tea Party even partially responsible, let's also lay some blame squarely at the feet of Sarah Palin. I don't use her name here often, as I refer to call her the Mama Grizzly Bore, but today, her name must be used, because she has blood on her hands.
When you use words and phrases like putting someone in your 'crosshairs' exactly what do you think that means? Crosshairs. Guns. Violence. When you ask that your followers reload, instead of retreat, what are you telling them? Take up arms. Shoot. Take up arms, and take the lives of people with whom you disagree, even if one of them is a nine-year-old girl, and others are grandmothers.
This has to stop. We cannot become a nation where violence is the means to sway the vote, and gain momentum for our cause. This has to stop. It's time for people like the Tea Party, and their minions, and Sarah Palin, and her minions, to accept responsibility for their words.
Words have power; words create violence; words incite. Whether the words are aimed at the LGBT community, or a Muslim community center, a liberal, or a conservative, the words must stop inciting violence.
Different is good. Differing opinions are good because they create dialogue. But putting someone in your crosshairs, and threatening to reload, sends the message that violence is the answer.
It isn't. And it's up to us, all of us, liberal and conservative, Democrat, Republican, Independent, whatever political affiliation, religious affiliation, non-religious affiliation, gender, ethnicity, orientation, color, age, education, socio-economic standing, to stop this speech.
Stop it.
Or start getting more body bags.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)